Software · head to head
Surpac vs Imago

Surpac
Software
Geology and mine planning software for all mining methods
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Surpac 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published; Imago now a Seequent product rather than an independent one, so it sits inside that ecosystem and its own domain no longer resolves
- They diverge on capability: Surpac covers Block modeling, Imago covers Drill hole management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Surpac and Imago actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Surpac
- Block modeling
- Mine design
- Resource estimation
- Workflow automation
- MineSched
- PCBC
- Whittle
- GEMS
Only in Imago
- Drill hole management
- Sample tracking
- Data validation
- Reporting tools
- Leapfrog
- Vulcan
- Excel
- GIS systems
Both cover
- Geological database
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Surpac
- Geological modelingnot Imago
- Mine planningnot Imago
- Resource estimationnot Imago
- Grade controlnot Imago
- Production trackingnot Imago
Imago
- Digitising and managing drill core photographynot Surpac
- Linking core imagery to geological logging datanot Surpac
- Streaming high-resolution core imagery into Leapfrog modelsnot Surpac
- Sharing geoscientific imagery across a distributed exploration teamnot Surpac
- Capturing core images in the field with the mobile appnot Surpac
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Surpac
- 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
Imago
- Now a Seequent product rather than an independent one, so it sits inside that ecosystem and its own domain no longer resolves
- Capturing images at quality expects the Capture X software driving a camera rig, so it is not purely a software purchase
Pricing, plan by plan
Surpac
On request- Surpac Core$6000/year
- 3D visualization
- Geological database
- Surface modeling
- Surpac Advanced$12000/year
- Block modeling
- Resource estimation
- Mine design
- Surpac Complete$20000/year
- All modules
- Underground planning
- Scheduling integration
Imago
On request- Imago Professional$6500/year
- Database management
- Drill hole tracking
- Sample management
Which should you pick?
Choose Imago if
- You need drill hole management.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want sample tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Surpac or Imago better?
- Neither clearly leads. Surpac starts at On request and Imago at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Surpac or Imago?
- Surpac starts at On request and Imago at On request.
- Does Surpac or Imago run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Surpac best used for?
- Surpac is most often used for geological modeling, mine planning, resource estimation, grade control. Of those, geological modeling and mine planning are not what Imago is typically brought in for.
- What can Surpac do that Imago cannot?
- Surpac covers Block modeling, Mine design, Resource estimation, Workflow automation. Imago covers Drill hole management, Sample tracking, Data validation, Reporting tools. Both handle Geological database, Windows support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Surpac vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Surpac vs Leapfrog Geo
- Surpac vs Deswik Suite
- Surpac vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Surpac vs Datamine
- Surpac vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Surpac vs Micromine
- Surpac vs Datamine Studio RM
- Surpac vs Maptek I-Site
- Surpac vs Minemax
- Surpac vs Promine
- Surpac vs Trimble Mining
- Surpac vs Vulcan
- Surpac vs 3DEC
- Surpac vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Surpac vs Carlson Mining
- Surpac vs Cority EHS
- Surpac vs Enablon EHS
- Imago vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Imago vs Leapfrog Geo
- Imago vs Deswik Suite
- Imago vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Imago vs Datamine
- Imago vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Imago vs Micromine
- Imago vs Datamine Studio RM
- Imago vs Maptek I-Site
- Imago vs Minemax
- Imago vs Promine
- Imago vs Trimble Mining
- Imago vs Vulcan
- Imago vs 3DEC
- Imago vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Imago vs Carlson Mining
- Imago vs Cority EHS
- Imago vs Enablon EHS

