Mining · head to head
Imago vs Seequent Central

Seequent Central
Mining
Collaborative platform for subsurface data management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Imago no pricing amounts published on vendor website; specific tier costs must be obtained by contacting sales; Seequent Central cloud hosted on Microsoft Azure and requires an internet connection, with no offline or self-hosted option
- They diverge on capability: Imago covers Geological database, Seequent Central covers Version control.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Imago and Seequent Central actually diverge.
| Attribute | Imago | Seequent Central |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Cloud, Windows |
| Founded | 1998 | 2004 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Imago
- Geological database
- Drill hole management
- Sample tracking
- Data validation
- Reporting tools
- Leapfrog
- Vulcan
- Excel
Only in Seequent Central
- Version control
- Model publishing
- Data management
- Audit trails
- Secure sharing
- Leapfrog Geo
- Leapfrog Works
- Oasis montaj
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Imago
- Digitising and managing drill core photographynot Seequent Central
- Linking core imagery to geological logging datanot Seequent Central
- Streaming high-resolution core imagery into Leapfrog modelsnot Seequent Central
- Sharing geoscientific imagery across a distributed exploration teamnot Seequent Central
- Capturing core images in the field with the mobile appnot Seequent Central
Seequent Central
- Centralised version control and audit trails for geological modelsnot Imago
- Shared 3D visualisation of Leapfrog and Oasis montaj models across distributed teamsnot Imago
- Project branching for scenario modellingnot Imago
- Mining exploration and geothermal project coordinationnot Imago
- Civil engineering and environmental projects needing a single model of recordnot Imago
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Imago
- No pricing amounts published on vendor website; specific tier costs must be obtained by contacting sales
- Tiers are designed for mining operations (each mine site requires separate subscription)
Seequent Central
- Cloud hosted on Microsoft Azure and requires an internet connection, with no offline or self-hosted option
- Hosting instances start at a minimum 500GB of storage, with more sold as an add-on
- Billing splits into three separate lines: cloud hosting per organisation, user subscriptions per person and Leapfrog Connector licences per modeller
- Publishing models from Leapfrog into Central requires a separate Leapfrog Connector licence
- Value depends on already owning other Seequent tools such as Leapfrog, GeoStudio, PLAXIS or Oasis montaj
Pricing, plan by plan
Imago
On request- Imago Professional$6500/year
- Database management
- Drill hole tracking
- Sample management
Seequent Central
On request- Central Team$5000/year
- Version control
- 5 users included
- 100GB storage
- Central Professional$12000/year
- All Team features
- 25 users included
- 500GB storage
- Central EnterpriseFree
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited storage
- SSO integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Imago if
- You need geological database.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want drill hole management.
Choose Seequent Central if
- You need version control.
- You work on Cloud, Windows.
- You also want model publishing.
Questions people ask
- Is Imago or Seequent Central better?
- Neither clearly leads. Imago starts at On request and Seequent Central at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Imago or Seequent Central?
- Imago starts at On request and Seequent Central at On request.
- Does Imago or Seequent Central run on more platforms?
- Imago runs on Windows. Seequent Central runs on Cloud, Windows.
- What is Imago best used for?
- Imago is most often used for digitising and managing drill core photography, linking core imagery to geological logging data, streaming high-resolution core imagery into leapfrog models, sharing geoscientific imagery across a distributed exploration team. Of those, digitising and managing drill core photography and linking core imagery to geological logging data are not what Seequent Central is typically brought in for.
- What can Imago do that Seequent Central cannot?
- Imago covers Geological database, Drill hole management, Sample tracking, Data validation. Seequent Central covers Version control, Model publishing, Data management, Audit trails. Both handle Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Imago: What are the Imago subscription tiers?
Imago offers three subscription tiers: Standard (single workspace, unlimited users, 3TB storage), Enterprise (multiple workspaces, unlimited users, 6TB shared storage, SSO and user group management), and Junior (single workspace, unlimited users, 500GB storage, for non-producing companies or academic licensing only). All tiers are contracted on 12-month agreements.
SourceSeequent Central: How much does Seequent Central cost?
Pricing is not published on the Seequent website. For information about Central pricing and purchase, customers must contact Seequent's sales team directly.
SourceImago: What add-on options are available for Imago?
Imago offers add-on subscriptions including Chip Shot (RC chip tray capture control), Mobile Capture X (smartphone field capture workflows), and Storage (additional capacity in 1TB increments). Each additional mine site requires a separate Imago subscription.
SourceSeequent Central: What is the subscription model for Seequent Central?
Seequent Central uses a tiered subscription approach requiring one cloud hosting instance per organization (minimum 500GB storage on Microsoft Azure), one user subscription per person accessing Central, and one Leapfrog Connector per user modeling in Leapfrog.
SourceSeequent Central: Are there add-on options for Seequent Central?
Yes, an Advanced Bundle add-on is available for active Central subscribers, which includes web portal, data collection, and data entry tools.
SourceRelated pages
More on Seequent Central
Other head to heads
- Imago vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Imago vs CorePlan
- Imago vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Imago vs Deswik Suite
- Imago vs Leapfrog Geo
- Imago vs Infomine Mining Intelligence
- Imago vs Maxwell Datacloud
- Imago vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Imago vs Cority EHS
- Imago vs MinePlan
- Imago vs Micromine
- Imago vs Enablon EHS
- Imago vs MineRP
- Imago vs MineSched
- Imago vs MineSight
- Imago vs Minviro
- Imago vs PCBC
- Imago vs Geoscience ANALYST
- Imago vs EQuIS Enterprise
- Imago vs IHS Markit Petra
- Imago vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- Imago vs Datamine
- Imago vs K-MINE
- Imago vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- Imago vs Minemax Planner
- Seequent Central vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Seequent Central vs CorePlan
- Seequent Central vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Seequent Central vs Deswik Suite
- Seequent Central vs Leapfrog Geo
- Seequent Central vs Infomine Mining Intelligence
- Seequent Central vs Maxwell Datacloud
- Seequent Central vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Seequent Central vs Cority EHS
- Seequent Central vs MinePlan
- Seequent Central vs Micromine
- Seequent Central vs Enablon EHS
- Seequent Central vs MineRP
- Seequent Central vs MineSched
- Seequent Central vs MineSight
- Seequent Central vs Minviro
- Seequent Central vs PCBC
- Seequent Central vs Geoscience ANALYST
- Seequent Central vs EQuIS Enterprise
- Seequent Central vs IHS Markit Petra
- Seequent Central vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- Seequent Central vs Datamine
- Seequent Central vs K-MINE
- Seequent Central vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- Seequent Central vs Minemax Planner

