Mining & Resources · head to head
MineSight vs Surpac

MineSight
Mining & Resources
Integrated mine design and planning software
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Surpac
Mining & Resources
Geology and mine planning software for all mining methods
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: MineSight mineSight (now part of Hexagon Mining) sells time-limited lease licenses rather than perpetual seats for exploration-stage users: License to Explore is scoped explicitly to "the life of a drilling campaign" and comes as two separate products, HxM Explorer and HxM Modeler, with additional functionality (UAV point-cloud surface meshing, a QAQC module) sold as further add-ons rather than included (archived press release, 6 March 2016); Surpac 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
- They diverge on capability: MineSight covers Geological modeling, Surpac covers Geological database.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MineSight and Surpac actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining & Resources), founded (1981).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MineSight
- Geological modeling
- 3D mine design
- Production scheduling
- Operations planning
- AutoCAD
- ArcGIS
- SAP
- Oracle
Only in Surpac
- Geological database
- Block modeling
- Mine design
- Workflow automation
- MineSched
- PCBC
- Whittle
- GEMS
Both cover
- Resource estimation
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MineSight
- Mine planning
- Resource schedulingnot Surpac
- Pit designnot Surpac
- Underground developmentnot Surpac
- Production optimizationnot Surpac
Surpac
- Geological modelingnot MineSight
- Mine planning
- Resource estimationnot MineSight
- Grade controlnot MineSight
- Production trackingnot MineSight
Both are used for mine planning, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MineSight
- MineSight (now part of Hexagon Mining) sells time-limited lease licenses rather than perpetual seats for exploration-stage users: License to Explore is scoped explicitly to "the life of a drilling campaign" and comes as two separate products, HxM Explorer and HxM Modeler, with additional functionality (UAV point-cloud surface meshing, a QAQC module) sold as further add-ons rather than included (archived press release, 6 March 2016)
Surpac
- 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
Pricing, plan by plan
MineSight
On request- MineSight Core$18000/year
- Geological modeling
- Mine design
- Block modeling
- MineSight Advanced$35000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource estimation
- Advanced optimization
Surpac
On request- Surpac Core$6000/year
- 3D visualization
- Geological database
- Surface modeling
- Surpac Advanced$12000/year
- Block modeling
- Resource estimation
- Mine design
- Surpac Complete$20000/year
- All modules
- Underground planning
- Scheduling integration
Which should you pick?
Choose MineSight if
- You need geological modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want 3d mine design.
Choose Surpac if
- You need geological database.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want block modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is MineSight or Surpac better?
- Neither clearly leads. MineSight starts at On request and Surpac at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MineSight or Surpac?
- MineSight starts at On request and Surpac at On request.
- Does MineSight or Surpac run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is MineSight best used for?
- MineSight is most often used for mine planning, resource scheduling, pit design, underground development. Of those, resource scheduling and pit design are not what Surpac is typically brought in for.
- What can MineSight do that Surpac cannot?
- MineSight covers Geological modeling, 3D mine design, Production scheduling, Operations planning. Surpac covers Geological database, Block modeling, Mine design, Workflow automation. Both handle Resource estimation, Windows support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- MineSight vs Caterpillar MineStar
- MineSight vs Leapfrog Geo
- MineSight vs Deswik Suite
- MineSight vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- MineSight vs Datamine
- MineSight vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- MineSight vs Micromine
- MineSight vs Datamine Studio RM
- MineSight vs Maptek I-Site
- MineSight vs Minemax
- MineSight vs Promine
- MineSight vs Trimble Mining
- MineSight vs Vulcan
- MineSight vs 3DEC
- MineSight vs acQuire GIM Suite
- MineSight vs Carlson Mining
- MineSight vs Cority EHS
- MineSight vs Enablon EHS
- Surpac vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Surpac vs Leapfrog Geo
- Surpac vs Deswik Suite
- Surpac vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Surpac vs Datamine
- Surpac vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Surpac vs Micromine
- Surpac vs Datamine Studio RM
- Surpac vs Maptek I-Site
- Surpac vs Minemax
- Surpac vs Promine
- Surpac vs Trimble Mining
- Surpac vs Vulcan
- Surpac vs 3DEC
- Surpac vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Surpac vs Carlson Mining
- Surpac vs Cority EHS
- Surpac vs Enablon EHS
