Software · head to head
PLAXIS vs Surpac

PLAXIS
Software
Finite element software for geotechnical analysis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Surpac
Software
Geology and mine planning software for all mining methods
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PLAXIS bentley states the cost of PLAXIS 2D, 2D Advanced, 2D Ultimate and the 2D WorkSuite varies per region, and publishes no rate on the product page; Surpac 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
- They diverge on capability: PLAXIS covers 2D & 3D finite element analysis, Surpac covers Geological database.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PLAXIS and Surpac actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PLAXIS
- 2D & 3D finite element analysis
- Advanced soil modeling
- Slope stability assessment
- Excavation design
- Support design
- AutoCAD
- GeoStudio
- ArcGIS
Only in Surpac
- Geological database
- Block modeling
- Mine design
- Resource estimation
- Workflow automation
- MineSched
- PCBC
- Whittle
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PLAXIS
- Finite element analysis of soil and rock deformation and stabilitynot Surpac
- Designing excavations, tunnels, embankments and foundationsnot Surpac
- Modelling groundwater flow, consolidation and seismic response in geotechnical worksnot Surpac
Surpac
- Geological modelingnot PLAXIS
- Mine planningnot PLAXIS
- Resource estimationnot PLAXIS
- Grade controlnot PLAXIS
- Production trackingnot PLAXIS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PLAXIS
- Bentley states the cost of PLAXIS 2D, 2D Advanced, 2D Ultimate and the 2D WorkSuite varies per region, and publishes no rate on the product page
- Consolidation, creep, groundwater flow and heat flow require the Advanced edition rather than the base PLAXIS 2D
- Dynamic, vibration and transient analysis require the Ultimate edition
- A perpetual licence only carries support and licence exchange rights while a paid annual SELECT subscription is maintained
- The Virtuoso subscription route is a 12 month lease, not an ongoing entitlement
Surpac
- 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
Pricing, plan by plan
PLAXIS
On request- PLAXIS 2D$16000/year
- 2D finite element analysis
- Slope stability
- Mine design
- PLAXIS 3D$28000/year
- 3D finite element analysis
- Complex geometry modeling
- Advanced soil modeling
Surpac
On request- Surpac Core$6000/year
- 3D visualization
- Geological database
- Surface modeling
- Surpac Advanced$12000/year
- Block modeling
- Resource estimation
- Mine design
- Surpac Complete$20000/year
- All modules
- Underground planning
- Scheduling integration
Which should you pick?
Choose PLAXIS if
- You need 2d & 3d finite element analysis.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want advanced soil modeling.
Choose Surpac if
- You need geological database.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want block modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is PLAXIS or Surpac better?
- Neither clearly leads. PLAXIS starts at On request and Surpac at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PLAXIS or Surpac?
- PLAXIS starts at On request and Surpac at On request.
- Does PLAXIS or Surpac run on more platforms?
- PLAXIS runs on Windows, Linux. Surpac runs on Windows.
- What is PLAXIS best used for?
- PLAXIS is most often used for finite element analysis of soil and rock deformation and stability, designing excavations, tunnels, embankments and foundations, modelling groundwater flow, consolidation and seismic response in geotechnical works. Of those, finite element analysis of soil and rock deformation and stability and designing excavations, tunnels, embankments and foundations are not what Surpac is typically brought in for.
- What can PLAXIS do that Surpac cannot?
- PLAXIS covers 2D & 3D finite element analysis, Advanced soil modeling, Slope stability assessment, Excavation design. Surpac covers Geological database, Block modeling, Mine design, Resource estimation. Both handle Windows support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- PLAXIS vs Caterpillar MineStar
- PLAXIS vs Leapfrog Geo
- PLAXIS vs Deswik Suite
- PLAXIS vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- PLAXIS vs Datamine
- PLAXIS vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- PLAXIS vs Micromine
- PLAXIS vs Datamine Studio RM
- PLAXIS vs Maptek I-Site
- PLAXIS vs Minemax
- PLAXIS vs Promine
- PLAXIS vs Trimble Mining
- PLAXIS vs Vulcan
- PLAXIS vs 3DEC
- PLAXIS vs acQuire GIM Suite
- PLAXIS vs Carlson Mining
- PLAXIS vs Cority EHS
- PLAXIS vs Enablon EHS
- Surpac vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Surpac vs Leapfrog Geo
- Surpac vs Deswik Suite
- Surpac vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Surpac vs Datamine
- Surpac vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Surpac vs Micromine
- Surpac vs Datamine Studio RM
- Surpac vs Maptek I-Site
- Surpac vs Minemax
- Surpac vs Promine
- Surpac vs Trimble Mining
- Surpac vs Vulcan
- Surpac vs 3DEC
- Surpac vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Surpac vs Carlson Mining
- Surpac vs Cority EHS
- Surpac vs Enablon EHS
