Software · head to head
Imago vs MineRP
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Imago now a Seequent product rather than an independent one, so it sits inside that ecosystem and its own domain no longer resolves; MineRP minerp.com 301 redirects to epiroc.com's mine planning product line, confirming MineRP was absorbed into Epiroc; the product is no longer sold as an independently branded platform and buyers must now evaluate it inside Epiroc's mining portfolio.
- They diverge on capability: Imago covers Geological database, MineRP covers Resource planning.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Imago and MineRP actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Imago
- Geological database
- Drill hole management
- Sample tracking
- Data validation
- Reporting tools
- Leapfrog
- GIS systems
Only in MineRP
- Resource planning
- Production scheduling
- Equipment management
- Constraint optimization
- Performance tracking
- Surpac
- ERP systems
- Web support
Both cover
- Vulcan
- Excel
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Imago
- Digitising and managing drill core photographynot MineRP
- Linking core imagery to geological logging datanot MineRP
- Streaming high-resolution core imagery into Leapfrog modelsnot MineRP
- Sharing geoscientific imagery across a distributed exploration teamnot MineRP
- Capturing core images in the field with the mobile appnot MineRP
MineRP
- Resource planningnot Imago
- Production schedulingnot Imago
- Equipment optimizationnot Imago
- Capacity planningnot Imago
- Operations managementnot Imago
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Imago
- Now a Seequent product rather than an independent one, so it sits inside that ecosystem and its own domain no longer resolves
- Capturing images at quality expects the Capture X software driving a camera rig, so it is not purely a software purchase
MineRP
- minerp.com 301 redirects to epiroc.com's mine planning product line, confirming MineRP was absorbed into Epiroc; the product is no longer sold as an independently branded platform and buyers must now evaluate it inside Epiroc's mining portfolio.
Pricing, plan by plan
Imago
On request- Imago Professional$6500/year
- Database management
- Drill hole tracking
- Sample management
MineRP
On request- MineRP Professional$19000/year
- Resource planning
- Production scheduling
- Constraint management
Which should you pick?
Choose Imago if
- You need geological database.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want drill hole management.
Choose MineRP if
- You need resource planning.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want production scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Imago or MineRP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Imago starts at On request and MineRP at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Imago or MineRP?
- Imago starts at On request and MineRP at On request.
- Does Imago or MineRP run on more platforms?
- Imago runs on Windows. MineRP runs on Windows, Web.
- What is Imago best used for?
- Imago is most often used for digitising and managing drill core photography, linking core imagery to geological logging data, streaming high-resolution core imagery into leapfrog models, sharing geoscientific imagery across a distributed exploration team. Of those, digitising and managing drill core photography and linking core imagery to geological logging data are not what MineRP is typically brought in for.
- What can Imago do that MineRP cannot?
- Imago covers Geological database, Drill hole management, Sample tracking, Data validation. MineRP covers Resource planning, Production scheduling, Equipment management, Constraint optimization. Both handle Vulcan, Excel, Windows support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Imago vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Imago vs Leapfrog Geo
- Imago vs Deswik Suite
- Imago vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Imago vs Datamine
- Imago vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Imago vs Micromine
- Imago vs Datamine Studio RM
- Imago vs Maptek I-Site
- Imago vs Minemax
- Imago vs Promine
- Imago vs Surpac
- Imago vs Trimble Mining
- Imago vs Vulcan
- Imago vs 3DEC
- Imago vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Imago vs Carlson Mining
- Imago vs Cority EHS
- MineRP vs Caterpillar MineStar
- MineRP vs Leapfrog Geo
- MineRP vs Deswik Suite
- MineRP vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- MineRP vs Datamine
- MineRP vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- MineRP vs Micromine
- MineRP vs Datamine Studio RM
- MineRP vs Maptek I-Site
- MineRP vs Minemax
- MineRP vs Promine
- MineRP vs Surpac
- MineRP vs Trimble Mining
- MineRP vs Vulcan
- MineRP vs 3DEC
- MineRP vs acQuire GIM Suite
- MineRP vs Carlson Mining
- MineRP vs Cority EHS


