Business Intelligence · head to head
Phocas vs Snowplow
Phocas
Business Intelligence
Pre-built BI and FP&A for wholesale distributors and manufacturers running mid-market ERPs
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Snowplow
Business Intelligence
Behavioural data pipeline you run in your own cloud, relicensed away from Apache 2.0 in 2024
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Phocas the value is the pre-built vertical content, so a company outside distribution, manufacturing or retail pays premium prices for dashboards it must build itself anyway.; Snowplow the core pipeline was relicensed from Apache 2.0 on 8 January 2024 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement and a Confluent-derived community licence, so organisations that adopted it as permissively licensed software must now review their entitlement, buy a licence, or migrate.
- They diverge on capability: Phocas covers ERP connectors, Snowplow covers Own-cloud deployment.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Phocas and Snowplow actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Business Intelligence).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Phocas
- ERP connectors
- Pre-built distribution content
- Grid-first analysis
- Financial statements
- Budgets and forecasts
- Rebates module
- Alerts and subscriptions
- Mobile apps
Only in Snowplow
- Own-cloud deployment
- Schema enforcement
- Warehouse loading
- Enrichment
- Trackers
- Streaming output
- Data models
- Snowplow BDP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Phocas
- A wholesale distributor on Prophet 21 whose sales reps need per-customer margin and stock availability without waiting on a report writernot Snowplow
- A manufacturer that wants budgeting on the same data as its sales analysis rather than in a separate spreadsheetnot Snowplow
- A multi-branch retailer comparing branch and product performance daily without an internal BI teamnot Snowplow
- A private equity owner standardising reporting across several acquired distributors on different ERPsnot Snowplow
Snowplow
- A data team that needs full-fidelity event data in its own warehouse to build attribution or machine learning features rather than to populate dashboardsnot Phocas
- A regulated business that cannot send behavioural data to a third-party analytics vendor and must keep collection inside its own cloud accountnot Phocas
- A product organisation tired of silently malformed events, which wants a schema contract enforced at collection timenot Phocas
- A company modelling customer behaviour across web, mobile and server events that needs them in one consistent structurenot Phocas
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Phocas
- The value is the pre-built vertical content, so a company outside distribution, manufacturing or retail pays premium prices for dashboards it must build itself anyway.
- If your ERP is not on the maintained connector list you fall back to generic database extraction and lose the fast time to value that justifies the price.
- The visualisation library is thin next to Power BI or Tableau, and analysts who want fine control over chart design will find it constraining.
- Pricing is quoted per user and never published, and buyers routinely report large gaps between initial and renewal quotes with limited comparison leverage.
- Modules are licensed separately, so a customer who bought Analytics and later wants Financial Statements or Rebates faces a new negotiation rather than an upgrade.
Snowplow
- The core pipeline was relicensed from Apache 2.0 on 8 January 2024 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement and a Confluent-derived community licence, so organisations that adopted it as permissively licensed software must now review their entitlement, buy a licence, or migrate.
- You run the pipeline in your own cloud, which means the infrastructure bill, the on-call rota and the upgrade work are yours, and at high event volume that operational cost frequently exceeds what a hosted product would have charged.
- Schema enforcement is the main benefit and the main friction, because every new event requires a schema to be authored and versioned, and teams without discipline around that end up blocked on their own governance process.
- There is no analysis layer: Snowplow delivers data to your warehouse and nothing else, so you still need modelling, a BI tool and the people to run them before anyone sees a number.
- The licence change fractured the community, spawning an Apache 2.0 fork, which means community contributions and third-party tooling are now split across two codebases with uncertain long-term maintenance.
Pricing, plan by plan
Phocas
On request- Phocas$undefined/year
- Annual subscription quoted by user count and modules
- Analytics, Financial Statements, Budgets and Rebates licensed separately
- One-off implementation and ERP connector setup fee
Snowplow
On request- Snowplow BDP$undefined/year
- Commercial pricing quoted by event volume and deployment
- Core pipeline components under the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement, not Apache 2.0
- Trackers, analytics SDKs and Iglu SDKs remain Apache 2.0
Which should you pick?
Choose Phocas if
- You need erp connectors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want pre-built distribution content.
Choose Snowplow if
- You need own-cloud deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web, Docker.
- You also want schema enforcement.
Questions people ask
- Is Phocas or Snowplow better?
- Neither clearly leads. Phocas starts at On request and Snowplow at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Phocas or Snowplow?
- Phocas starts at On request and Snowplow at On request.
- Does Phocas or Snowplow run on more platforms?
- Phocas runs on Web, iOS, Android. Snowplow runs on Linux, Web, Docker.
- What is Phocas best used for?
- Phocas is most often used for a wholesale distributor on prophet 21 whose sales reps need per-customer margin and stock availability without waiting on a report writer, a manufacturer that wants budgeting on the same data as its sales analysis rather than in a separate spreadsheet, a multi-branch retailer comparing branch and product performance daily without an internal bi team, a private equity owner standardising reporting across several acquired distributors on different erps. Of those, a wholesale distributor on prophet 21 whose sales reps need per-customer margin and stock availability without waiting on a report writer and a manufacturer that wants budgeting on the same data as its sales analysis rather than in a separate spreadsheet are not what Snowplow is typically brought in for.
- What can Phocas do that Snowplow cannot?
- Phocas covers ERP connectors, Pre-built distribution content, Grid-first analysis, Financial statements. Snowplow covers Own-cloud deployment, Schema enforcement, Warehouse loading, Enrichment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Phocas: What does Phocas cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted annually by user count and module, with a separate implementation fee, and varies by region.
Snowplow: Is Snowplow still open source?
Not in the permissive sense. On 8 January 2024 the core pipeline moved from Apache 2.0 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement, with version 1.1 following in December 2024, alongside a community licence based on the Confluent Community Licence. Trackers and analytics SDKs remain Apache 2.0.
Phocas: Is it worth it over Power BI?
Only if you are in its target verticals on a supported ERP. Power BI is far cheaper per seat but you supply the data model.
Snowplow: Can we still run it for free in production?
Free use of the relicensed core components is materially constrained and commercial use generally requires an agreement. Read the current licence text against your intended use rather than relying on older documentation.
Phocas: Does it replace my ERP reporting?
It replaces day-to-day analysis and sales reporting. Transactional and statutory reporting stays in the ERP.
Snowplow: Is there an Apache 2.0 alternative?
Yes, a fork called OpenSnowcat was created in response to the relicensing and continues under Apache 2.0.
Phocas: Can it do budgeting?
Yes, through a separately licensed Financial Statements and Budgets module on the same warehouse.
Snowplow: What does Snowplow BDP cost?
Not published. It is quoted by event volume and deployment, and your own cloud infrastructure costs are separate and additional.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Phocas vs Power BI
- Phocas vs Domo
- Phocas vs Zoho Analytics
- Phocas vs Jedox
- Phocas vs Zenlytic
- Phocas vs Hex
- Phocas vs Evidence
- Phocas vs Cyfe
- Phocas vs DashThis
- Phocas vs Fabi
- Phocas vs Luzmo
- Phocas vs Quid
- Phocas vs Stripe Dashboard
- Phocas vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Phocas vs Yellowfin
- Phocas vs Zebra BI
- Phocas vs Anaplan
- Phocas vs Pigment
- Phocas vs Hebbia
- Phocas vs Logi Analytics
- Phocas vs Preset
- Phocas vs ProfitWell
- Phocas vs Sisense
- Phocas vs Amazon QuickSight
- Phocas vs MicroStrategy
- Phocas vs ThoughtSpot
- Phocas vs Cube
- Snowplow vs Power BI
- Snowplow vs Domo
- Snowplow vs Zoho Analytics
- Snowplow vs Jedox
- Snowplow vs Zenlytic
- Snowplow vs Hex
- Snowplow vs Evidence
- Snowplow vs Cyfe
- Snowplow vs DashThis
- Snowplow vs Fabi
- Snowplow vs Luzmo
- Snowplow vs Quid
- Snowplow vs Stripe Dashboard
- Snowplow vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Snowplow vs Yellowfin
- Snowplow vs Zebra BI
- Snowplow vs Anaplan
- Snowplow vs Pigment
- Snowplow vs Hebbia
- Snowplow vs Logi Analytics
- Snowplow vs Preset
- Snowplow vs ProfitWell
- Snowplow vs Sisense
- Snowplow vs Amazon QuickSight
- Snowplow vs MicroStrategy
- Snowplow vs ThoughtSpot
- Snowplow vs Cube