Cybersecurity · head to head
Sardine vs Yoti

Sardine
Cybersecurity
Device intelligence and behaviour biometrics for fraud and compliance
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Yoti
Cybersecurity
Reusable digital identity, facial age estimation and identity verification
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Sardine signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.; Yoti age estimation returns a probabilistic range rather than a verified date of birth, so it only works with a safety buffer above the legal threshold and cannot prove an exact age.
- They diverge on capability: Sardine covers Device intelligence, Yoti covers Facial age estimation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sardine and Yoti actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sardine
- Device intelligence
- Behaviour biometrics
- Scam detection
- Onboarding risk scoring
- AML transaction monitoring
- Dispute and chargeback handling
- Rules editor
Only in Yoti
- Facial age estimation
- Reusable digital ID
- Identity verification
- UK right to work and rent
- Digital ID for retail
- Selective disclosure
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sardine
- A neobank losing money to authorised push payment scams where the customer genuinely approved the transfernot Yoti
- A crypto exchange trying to detect accounts being operated by remote access rather than by their ownernot Yoti
- A fintech seeing synthetic identity signups that pass document verification but share device characteristicsnot Yoti
- A lender wanting first party fraud signals at application time that a credit bureau file does not containnot Yoti
Yoti
- A social platform meeting UK Online Safety Act age assurance duties without collecting identity documents from teenagersnot Sardine
- A supermarket removing staff interventions at self-checkout for age-restricted purchasesnot Sardine
- A UK employer running digital right-to-work checks under the certified trust framework rather than inspecting passportsnot Sardine
- A gambling operator needing an age gate with high completion rates before the account funding stepnot Sardine
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sardine
- Signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.
- Behavioural and device telemetry collection needs a documented lawful basis under GDPR, and EU privacy reviews frequently delay rollouts that were scoped as engineering work.
- Pricing is per session or per active user, so a consumer product with many low value sessions pays in proportion to traffic rather than to fraud exposure.
- As a younger private company it lacks the enforcement-tested audit history that a bank examiner expects, which makes it a harder sell inside a regulated bank than inside a fintech.
- It is strongest on session-time signals and weaker as a system of record for long horizon AML typologies, so larger institutions end up running it alongside a traditional monitoring platform rather than instead of one.
Yoti
- Age estimation returns a probabilistic range rather than a verified date of birth, so it only works with a safety buffer above the legal threshold and cannot prove an exact age.
- Estimation accuracy varies by demographic and reported error margins widen at the age bands that matter most for eighteen-year thresholds, which pushes borderline users into a document fallback you still have to pay for.
- Pricing is not published, so buyers cannot compare the cost of an estimation check against a document check without going through sales.
- Regulatory acceptance of facial estimation differs by jurisdiction, so a method that satisfies Ofcom may not satisfy a regulator elsewhere and multi-market platforms need more than one approach.
- The reusable digital identity app depends on consumer adoption, which is meaningful in the UK and thin elsewhere, limiting the reusability benefit outside its home market.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sardine
On request- Sardine$undefined/year
- Priced per user session or per monthly active user
- Annual contract with volume commitment
- SDK for web, iOS and Android
Yoti
On request- Yoti Age and Identity Services$undefined/year
- Per-check pricing quoted by volume and method
- Age estimation, document verification and digital ID priced differently
- Right to work and right to rent checks quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Sardine if
- You need device intelligence.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want behaviour biometrics.
Choose Yoti if
- You need facial age estimation.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want reusable digital id.
Questions people ask
- Is Sardine or Yoti better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sardine starts at On request and Yoti at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sardine or Yoti?
- Sardine starts at On request and Yoti at On request.
- Does Sardine or Yoti run on more platforms?
- Sardine runs on Web, iOS, Android. Yoti runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Sardine best used for?
- Sardine is most often used for a neobank losing money to authorised push payment scams where the customer genuinely approved the transfer, a crypto exchange trying to detect accounts being operated by remote access rather than by their owner, a fintech seeing synthetic identity signups that pass document verification but share device characteristics, a lender wanting first party fraud signals at application time that a credit bureau file does not contain. Of those, a neobank losing money to authorised push payment scams where the customer genuinely approved the transfer and a crypto exchange trying to detect accounts being operated by remote access rather than by their owner are not what Yoti is typically brought in for.
- What can Sardine do that Yoti cannot?
- Sardine covers Device intelligence, Behaviour biometrics, Scam detection, Onboarding risk scoring. Yoti covers Facial age estimation, Reusable digital ID, Identity verification, UK right to work and rent.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sardine: Does Sardine do document verification?
It focuses on device, behavioural and transaction signals, and integrates identity verification providers rather than being one. Treat it as complementary to a KYC vendor.
Yoti: Does age estimation store my face?
The image is used to produce an estimate and then deleted rather than retained, which is the specific property that makes it usable for age assurance on minors.
Sardine: What does it need from us to work?
An SDK in your web and mobile applications plus transaction feeds. Without the client side collector you lose the signals that differentiate it.
Yoti: Is it accepted for UK Online Safety Act compliance?
Facial age estimation is one of the methods regulators have accepted as highly effective age assurance. Confirm the current position with your own counsel for your content category.
Sardine: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted, typically per session or per monthly active user with an annual volume commitment.
Yoti: Can it prove someone is exactly 21?
No. It gives a range. If you need a precise age you need a document or database check, which Yoti also sells.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Sardine vs Unit21
- Sardine vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sardine vs Feedzai
- Sardine vs NICE Actimize
- Sardine vs Socure
- Sardine vs ThetaRay
- Sardine vs Transmit Security
- Sardine vs Jumio
- Sardine vs iDenfy
- Sardine vs Silent Eight
- Sardine vs Sumsub
- Sardine vs Quantexa
- Sardine vs TunnelBear
- Sardine vs Vanta
- Sardine vs Acunetix
- Sardine vs Aikido
- Sardine vs Arnica
- Sardine vs Authelia
- Sardine vs Veriff
- Sardine vs IDnow
- Sardine vs Shufti Pro
- Sardine vs Trulioo
- Sardine vs Signicat
- Sardine vs LogicManager
- Sardine vs Delinea
- Sardine vs Syft
- Sardine vs Very Good Security
- Sardine vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Sardine vs Windscribe
- Sardine vs authentik
- Sardine vs Avast One
- Sardine vs Chainguard
- Yoti vs Unit21
- Yoti vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Yoti vs Feedzai
- Yoti vs NICE Actimize
- Yoti vs Socure
- Yoti vs ThetaRay
- Yoti vs Transmit Security
- Yoti vs Jumio
- Yoti vs iDenfy
- Yoti vs Silent Eight
- Yoti vs Sumsub
- Yoti vs Quantexa
- Yoti vs TunnelBear
- Yoti vs Vanta
- Yoti vs Acunetix
- Yoti vs Aikido
- Yoti vs Arnica
- Yoti vs Authelia
- Yoti vs Veriff
- Yoti vs IDnow
- Yoti vs Shufti Pro
- Yoti vs Trulioo
- Yoti vs Signicat
- Yoti vs LogicManager
- Yoti vs Delinea
- Yoti vs Syft
- Yoti vs Very Good Security
- Yoti vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Yoti vs Windscribe
- Yoti vs authentik
- Yoti vs Avast One
- Yoti vs Chainguard
