Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Yoti

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Yoti
Cybersecurity
Reusable digital identity, facial age estimation and identity verification
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Chainguard has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Yoti age estimation returns a probabilistic range rather than a verified date of birth, so it only works with a safety buffer above the legal threshold and cannot prove an exact age.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Yoti covers Facial age estimation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Yoti actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Yoti |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Web, iOS, Android, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Yoti
- Facial age estimation
- Reusable digital ID
- Identity verification
- UK right to work and rent
- Digital ID for retail
- Selective disclosure
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Yoti
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Yoti
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Yoti
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Yoti
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Yoti
Yoti
- A social platform meeting UK Online Safety Act age assurance duties without collecting identity documents from teenagersnot Chainguard
- A supermarket removing staff interventions at self-checkout for age-restricted purchasesnot Chainguard
- A UK employer running digital right-to-work checks under the certified trust framework rather than inspecting passportsnot Chainguard
- A gambling operator needing an age gate with high completion rates before the account funding stepnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Yoti
- Age estimation returns a probabilistic range rather than a verified date of birth, so it only works with a safety buffer above the legal threshold and cannot prove an exact age.
- Estimation accuracy varies by demographic and reported error margins widen at the age bands that matter most for eighteen-year thresholds, which pushes borderline users into a document fallback you still have to pay for.
- Pricing is not published, so buyers cannot compare the cost of an estimation check against a document check without going through sales.
- Regulatory acceptance of facial estimation differs by jurisdiction, so a method that satisfies Ofcom may not satisfy a regulator elsewhere and multi-market platforms need more than one approach.
- The reusable digital identity app depends on consumer adoption, which is meaningful in the UK and thin elsewhere, limiting the reusability benefit outside its home market.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Yoti
On request- Yoti Age and Identity Services$undefined/year
- Per-check pricing quoted by volume and method
- Age estimation, document verification and digital ID priced differently
- Right to work and right to rent checks quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Yoti if
- You need facial age estimation.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want reusable digital id.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Yoti better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Yoti at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Yoti?
- Chainguard has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Chainguard and On request for Yoti.
- Does Chainguard or Yoti run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Yoti runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Yes. Chainguard has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Yoti starts at On request.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Yoti is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Yoti cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Yoti covers Facial age estimation, Reusable digital ID, Identity verification, UK right to work and rent.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceYoti: Does age estimation store my face?
The image is used to produce an estimate and then deleted rather than retained, which is the specific property that makes it usable for age assurance on minors.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceYoti: Is it accepted for UK Online Safety Act compliance?
Facial age estimation is one of the methods regulators have accepted as highly effective age assurance. Confirm the current position with your own counsel for your content category.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceYoti: Can it prove someone is exactly 21?
No. It gives a range. If you need a precise age you need a document or database check, which Yoti also sells.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Veriff
- Chainguard vs iDenfy
- Chainguard vs IDnow
- Chainguard vs Shufti Pro
- Chainguard vs Trulioo
- Chainguard vs Sumsub
- Chainguard vs Jumio
- Chainguard vs Signicat
- Chainguard vs Socure
- Chainguard vs LogicManager
- Chainguard vs Delinea
- Chainguard vs Syft
- Chainguard vs Very Good Security
- Chainguard vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Chainguard vs Windscribe
- Chainguard vs authentik
- Chainguard vs Avast One
- Yoti vs Snyk
- Yoti vs Trivy
- Yoti vs Doppler
- Yoti vs Infisical
- Yoti vs Grype
- Yoti vs Arnica
- Yoti vs HashiCorp Vault
- Yoti vs Bitwarden
- Yoti vs Semgrep
- Yoti vs Authelia
- Yoti vs Endor Labs
- Yoti vs Tenable
- Yoti vs Hanwha Vision
- Yoti vs Idira
- Yoti vs IVPN
- Yoti vs Logto
- Yoti vs Malwarebytes
- Yoti vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Yoti vs Veriff
- Yoti vs iDenfy
- Yoti vs IDnow
- Yoti vs Shufti Pro
- Yoti vs Trulioo
- Yoti vs Sumsub
- Yoti vs Jumio
- Yoti vs Signicat
- Yoti vs Socure
- Yoti vs LogicManager
- Yoti vs Delinea
- Yoti vs Syft
- Yoti vs Very Good Security
- Yoti vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Yoti vs Windscribe
- Yoti vs authentik
- Yoti vs Avast One
