Cybersecurity · head to head
Feedzai vs Shufti Pro

Feedzai
Cybersecurity
Real-time transaction fraud and financial crime detection for banks and payment processors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Shufti Pro
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening at the low cost end of the market
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Feedzai pricing is per transaction with an annual minimum, so a bank with seasonal or growing volume commits to a floor it may not use and pays overage above the band.; Shufti Pro rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- They diverge on capability: Feedzai covers Real-time scoring, Shufti Pro covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Feedzai and Shufti Pro actually diverge.
| Attribute | Feedzai | Shufti Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Feedzai
- Real-time scoring
- Rule and model hybrid
- Case manager
- Behavioural biometrics
- Model explainability
- Deployment options
Only in Shufti Pro
- Document verification
- Facial biometrics
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- Address verification
- Age verification
- Pay as you go option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Feedzai
- A bank joining an instant payments scheme where transfers are irrevocable and post-hoc recovery is impossiblenot Shufti Pro
- A card issuer whose existing rules engine cannot be changed without a release, so fraud waves run for daysnot Shufti Pro
- An acquirer needing per-merchant risk models rather than one portfolio-wide modelnot Shufti Pro
- A bank required by its regulator to explain automated declines to customers, which rules out opaque scoringnot Shufti Pro
Shufti Pro
- A crypto exchange onboarding users in markets where premium vendors have poor document coveragenot Feedzai
- A gambling operator needing age assurance at high volume where per-check cost dominates the unit economicsnot Feedzai
- A gig economy platform verifying couriers whose documents are photographed on low end phonesnot Feedzai
- A startup that needs verification without signing an annual volume commitment before it knows its volumenot Feedzai
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Feedzai
- Pricing is per transaction with an annual minimum, so a bank with seasonal or growing volume commits to a floor it may not use and pays overage above the band.
- It sits in the authorisation path, which makes every upgrade a change-controlled event with rollback plans, and the operational burden falls on the bank rather than the vendor.
- Out of the box models need months of the customer own labelled fraud history before they beat the rules they replace, so the value case starts late.
- AML and fraud are licensed as separate modules, so institutions expecting one platform fee find the transaction monitoring capability is a second line item.
- The buyer profile is large institutions, so smaller banks and fintechs face minimums that make per-transaction economics unattractive below significant scale.
Shufti Pro
- Rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- Accuracy on difficult document types trails the premium vendors, and the saving per check is often consumed by the manual review headcount handling the additional referrals.
- The enterprise assurance profile is thinner than that of larger competitors, so regulated bank procurement teams frequently rule it out at the vendor risk stage rather than on capability.
- Support responsiveness scales with contract size, and pay as you go customers have limited recourse when a document type suddenly starts failing in one market.
- Country coverage is broad but uneven in depth, meaning the same product can perform very differently across two markets you are launching in simultaneously.
Pricing, plan by plan
Feedzai
On request- Feedzai Financial Crime Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by transaction volume with annual minimum commitment
- Modules for fraud, AML and account opening licensed separately
- Cloud, private cloud and on-premises deployment
Shufti Pro
On request- Pay as you go$undefined/month
- Consumption billing with no annual commitment
- Rate quoted by sales, not published
- Resubmission sessions stated as not billable
- Monthly commitment$undefined/month
- Lower per-verification rate against a volume commitment
- AML screening and KYB priced as add-ons
- Free trial available before contracting
Which should you pick?
Choose Feedzai if
- You need real-time scoring.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want rule and model hybrid.
Choose Shufti Pro if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want facial biometrics.
Questions people ask
- Is Feedzai or Shufti Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. Feedzai starts at On request and Shufti Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Feedzai or Shufti Pro?
- Feedzai starts at On request and Shufti Pro at On request.
- Does Feedzai or Shufti Pro run on more platforms?
- Feedzai runs on Web, Linux. Shufti Pro runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Feedzai best used for?
- Feedzai is most often used for a bank joining an instant payments scheme where transfers are irrevocable and post-hoc recovery is impossible, a card issuer whose existing rules engine cannot be changed without a release, so fraud waves run for days, an acquirer needing per-merchant risk models rather than one portfolio-wide model, a bank required by its regulator to explain automated declines to customers, which rules out opaque scoring. Of those, a bank joining an instant payments scheme where transfers are irrevocable and post-hoc recovery is impossible and a card issuer whose existing rules engine cannot be changed without a release, so fraud waves run for days are not what Shufti Pro is typically brought in for.
- What can Feedzai do that Shufti Pro cannot?
- Feedzai covers Real-time scoring, Rule and model hybrid, Case manager, Behavioural biometrics. Shufti Pro covers Document verification, Facial biometrics, AML screening, KYB verification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Feedzai: Can Feedzai run on-premises?
Yes. On-premises and private cloud deployments are supported, which is why it appears in markets where transaction data cannot legally leave the country.
Shufti Pro: Are failed attempts charged?
Shufti states that resubmission sessions are not charged and that billing follows successful verification attempts. Get that written into the contract, because it materially changes total cost.
Feedzai: Does it cover AML as well as fraud?
It does, but transaction monitoring is a separately licensed module. Assume two line items if you want both.
Shufti Pro: Is there a published price?
No. Plan structures are published but rates are quoted. Third party estimates put effective cost well below premium vendors.
Feedzai: How fast are decisions?
Designed for the authorisation window, typically tens of milliseconds. This is the constraint that rules out batch scoring architectures.
Shufti Pro: Can we start without a commitment?
Yes. A pay as you go option exists, which is unusual in this category and useful for early stage volume.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Feedzai vs Unit21
- Feedzai vs ThetaRay
- Feedzai vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Feedzai vs NICE Actimize
- Feedzai vs Quantexa
- Feedzai vs Sardine
- Feedzai vs Silent Eight
- Feedzai vs Transmit Security
- Feedzai vs Fenergo
- Feedzai vs Socure
- Feedzai vs Sumsub
- Feedzai vs iDenfy
- Feedzai vs BeyondTrust
- Feedzai vs Bitdefender VPN
- Feedzai vs Burp Suite
- Feedzai vs Check Point Software
- Feedzai vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Feedzai vs Darktrace
- Feedzai vs Jumio
- Feedzai vs Veriff
- Feedzai vs IDnow
- Feedzai vs Trulioo
- Feedzai vs Yoti
- Feedzai vs Signicat
- Feedzai vs Keeper Password Manager
- Feedzai vs Keygen
- Feedzai vs KnowBe4
- Feedzai vs Legit Security
- Feedzai vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Feedzai vs Metasploit
- Shufti Pro vs Unit21
- Shufti Pro vs ThetaRay
- Shufti Pro vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Shufti Pro vs NICE Actimize
- Shufti Pro vs Quantexa
- Shufti Pro vs Sardine
- Shufti Pro vs Silent Eight
- Shufti Pro vs Transmit Security
- Shufti Pro vs Fenergo
- Shufti Pro vs Socure
- Shufti Pro vs Sumsub
- Shufti Pro vs iDenfy
- Shufti Pro vs BeyondTrust
- Shufti Pro vs Bitdefender VPN
- Shufti Pro vs Burp Suite
- Shufti Pro vs Check Point Software
- Shufti Pro vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Shufti Pro vs Darktrace
- Shufti Pro vs Jumio
- Shufti Pro vs Veriff
- Shufti Pro vs IDnow
- Shufti Pro vs Trulioo
- Shufti Pro vs Yoti
- Shufti Pro vs Signicat
- Shufti Pro vs Keeper Password Manager
- Shufti Pro vs Keygen
- Shufti Pro vs KnowBe4
- Shufti Pro vs Legit Security
- Shufti Pro vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Shufti Pro vs Metasploit
