Manufacturing · head to head
GENESIS Version 11 vs Sensemore

GENESIS Version 11
Manufacturing
Iconics SCADA and visualisation under Mitsubishi Electric, now sold with unlimited tag licensing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sensemore
Manufacturing
Low-cost wireless vibration and temperature monitoring with cloud analytics from a Turkish sensor manufacturer
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GENESIS Version 11 the name has changed twice, from GENESIS64 to GENESIS Version 11 with an Iconics-to-Mitsubishi ownership shift, so documentation, forum answers and integrator experience are split across three product identities.; Sensemore the company is small and young, so the failure-mode library behind its models is built on a much narrower installed base than SKF or Augury can draw on, and diagnostic specificity reflects that.
- They diverge on capability: GENESIS Version 11 covers Unlimited tag licensing, Sensemore covers Wireless vibration sensors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GENESIS Version 11 and Sensemore actually diverge.
| Attribute | GENESIS Version 11 | Sensemore |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GENESIS Version 11
- Unlimited tag licensing
- GraphWorX
- Hyper Historian
- AnalytiX
- Web and mobile clients
- BACnet and building protocols
- Alarm and notification
- Energy AnalytiX
Only in Sensemore
- Wireless vibration sensors
- Handheld analyser
- Cloud platform
- Machine learning models
- Multi-sensor synchronisation
- Gateways
- Open API
- Alarm notifications
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GENESIS Version 11
- A university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansionnot Sensemore
- A data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3D floor model rather than a line diagramnot Sensemore
- A water utility wanting pump station status on a GIS map alongside historised flow and pressure datanot Sensemore
- A Mitsubishi Electric factory automation site wanting supervisory visualisation from the same vendor as the controllersnot Sensemore
Sensemore
- A cement plant that wants coverage across the whole motor fleet rather than only the critical shortlistnot GENESIS Version 11
- A mid-market manufacturer where the Western vendors quotes exceed the maintenance budget entirelynot GENESIS Version 11
- An integrator packaging condition monitoring into a broader plant automation projectnot GENESIS Version 11
- A water utility instrumenting remote pumping stations where sending a technician to take readings is the main costnot GENESIS Version 11
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GENESIS Version 11
- The name has changed twice, from GENESIS64 to GENESIS Version 11 with an Iconics-to-Mitsubishi ownership shift, so documentation, forum answers and integrator experience are split across three product identities.
- Unlimited licensing sets a high floor: a small site with a few hundred points pays for capacity it cannot use, and tag-priced competitors remain cheaper below a few thousand points.
- It is a Windows and Microsoft-stack product, depending on SQL Server and Windows services, so Linux-first or containerised deployment strategies do not apply to it.
- Mitsubishi Electric now owns it outright, and roadmap priorities follow that group’s factory automation strategy rather than the independent building-automation direction Iconics previously set.
- The 3D and GIS visualisation that distinguishes it takes real modelling effort to populate, and estates that skip that work end up with an expensive licence driving conventional 2D screens.
Sensemore
- The company is small and young, so the failure-mode library behind its models is built on a much narrower installed base than SKF or Augury can draw on, and diagnostic specificity reflects that.
- Support and spares are largely delivered through distributors, so response quality varies by country and buyers outside Turkey and the immediate region should verify local coverage before ordering.
- Pricing is not published and routes through integrators, which means the software cost is often bundled into a project price you cannot decompose.
- Long-term vendor viability is an open question for a venture-stage hardware company, and a sensor network is a ten-year commitment; an exit or wind-down would strand the installed hardware.
- Documentation and the analytics user interface are thinner than established competitors, so teams without vibration expertise get less guidance in interpreting what the platform flags.
Pricing, plan by plan
GENESIS Version 11
On request- GENESIS Version 11$undefined/year
- Unlimited tags, users and connected devices within a licence
- Licensed by product module rather than by point count
- Sold and configured through Mitsubishi Electric and Iconics system integrators
Sensemore
On request- Sensemore platform$undefined/year
- Hardware purchased per monitoring point
- Cloud platform subscription quoted by sensor count
- Sold largely through distributors and system integrators
Which should you pick?
Choose GENESIS Version 11 if
- You need unlimited tag licensing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want graphworx.
Choose Sensemore if
- You need wireless vibration sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want handheld analyser.
Questions people ask
- Is GENESIS Version 11 or Sensemore better?
- Neither clearly leads. GENESIS Version 11 starts at On request and Sensemore at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GENESIS Version 11 or Sensemore?
- GENESIS Version 11 starts at On request and Sensemore at On request.
- Does GENESIS Version 11 or Sensemore run on more platforms?
- GENESIS Version 11 runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Sensemore runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is GENESIS Version 11 best used for?
- GENESIS Version 11 is most often used for a university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansion, a data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3d floor model rather than a line diagram, a water utility wanting pump station status on a gis map alongside historised flow and pressure data, a mitsubishi electric factory automation site wanting supervisory visualisation from the same vendor as the controllers. Of those, a university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansion and a data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3d floor model rather than a line diagram are not what Sensemore is typically brought in for.
- What can GENESIS Version 11 do that Sensemore cannot?
- GENESIS Version 11 covers Unlimited tag licensing, GraphWorX, Hyper Historian, AnalytiX. Sensemore covers Wireless vibration sensors, Handheld analyser, Cloud platform, Machine learning models.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GENESIS Version 11: Is GENESIS64 discontinued?
It has been superseded. GENESIS Version 11 is the current release and the name GENESIS64 is retired.
Sensemore: Where is Sensemore based?
Istanbul, Turkey. It designs and manufactures its own sensing hardware.
GENESIS Version 11: Does version 11 really have no tag limits?
Yes, tag, user and device counting was removed in version 11. Licensing is by module instead.
Sensemore: Is pricing published?
No. Hardware and platform are quoted, usually through a distributor or system integrator.
GENESIS Version 11: Who owns Iconics now?
Mitsubishi Electric, which took full ownership. Iconics continues to operate under its own name from Massachusetts.
Sensemore: How does it compare on cost?
It is positioned below the established Western condition monitoring vendors, which is the reason most buyers evaluate it.
GENESIS Version 11: Can it act as a building management system on its own?
It is the supervisory and analytics layer. It reads BACnet and building controllers but does not replace field-level plant controllers.
Sensemore: Can I get the raw data out?
Yes, there is a REST API and MQTT support for pulling measurements into other systems.
Related pages
More on GENESIS Version 11
Other head to heads
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Ignition
- GENESIS Version 11 vs AVEVA System Platform
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- GENESIS Version 11 vs COPA-DATA zenon
- GENESIS Version 11 vs ABB 800xA
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- GENESIS Version 11 vs OpenBOM
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Kepware Server
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Markforged Eiger
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Oqton
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Petasense
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Simplify3D
- GENESIS Version 11 vs TrendMiner
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Xometry
- GENESIS Version 11 vs KCF Technologies
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Augury
- GENESIS Version 11 vs SKF Enlight Centre
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Erbessd Instruments
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- GENESIS Version 11 vs MOVUS
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Poseidon Systems
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Samotics
- GENESIS Version 11 vs PROGNOST Systems
- GENESIS Version 11 vs eMaint
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Prodsmart
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Propel
- GENESIS Version 11 vs ProShop ERP
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Protolabs
- Sensemore vs Ignition
- Sensemore vs AVEVA System Platform
- Sensemore vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Sensemore vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Sensemore vs ABB 800xA
- Sensemore vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Sensemore vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Sensemore vs OpenBOM
- Sensemore vs Kepware Server
- Sensemore vs Markforged Eiger
- Sensemore vs Oqton
- Sensemore vs Petasense
- Sensemore vs Simplify3D
- Sensemore vs TrendMiner
- Sensemore vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Sensemore vs Xometry
- Sensemore vs KCF Technologies
- Sensemore vs Augury
- Sensemore vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Sensemore vs Erbessd Instruments
- Sensemore vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Sensemore vs MOVUS
- Sensemore vs Poseidon Systems
- Sensemore vs Samotics
- Sensemore vs PROGNOST Systems
- Sensemore vs eMaint
- Sensemore vs Prodsmart
- Sensemore vs Propel
- Sensemore vs ProShop ERP
- Sensemore vs Protolabs
