Cybersecurity · head to head
Saviynt vs Shufti Pro

Saviynt
Cybersecurity
Cloud identity governance with privileged access in the same platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Shufti Pro
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening at the low cost end of the market
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Saviynt implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.; Shufti Pro rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- They diverge on capability: Saviynt covers Identity governance, Shufti Pro covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Saviynt and Shufti Pro actually diverge.
| Attribute | Saviynt | Shufti Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Saviynt
- Identity governance
- Access certification
- Segregation of duties
- Privileged access
- Cloud entitlements
- Third party access
- Access request
Only in Shufti Pro
- Document verification
- Facial biometrics
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- Address verification
- Age verification
- Pay as you go option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Saviynt
- An enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviewsnot Shufti Pro
- A healthcare system governing clinician access to Epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaignnot Shufti Pro
- A company that has to prove segregation of duties in SAP to an external auditor every yearnot Shufti Pro
- A federal contractor needing an identity governance service with FedRAMP authorisationnot Shufti Pro
Shufti Pro
- A crypto exchange onboarding users in markets where premium vendors have poor document coveragenot Saviynt
- A gambling operator needing age assurance at high volume where per-check cost dominates the unit economicsnot Saviynt
- A gig economy platform verifying couriers whose documents are photographed on low end phonesnot Saviynt
- A startup that needs verification without signing an annual volume commitment before it knows its volumenot Saviynt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Saviynt
- Implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.
- Governance quality is limited by HR and application data quality, so organisations with inconsistent joiner records spend the early phases correcting source data rather than certifying access.
- Pricing is per governed identity, so counting contractors, service accounts and non-employee identities materially changes the bill and the definition is worth negotiating explicitly.
- The privileged access module is younger than the governance core and is not a full substitute for a dedicated PAM product in estates with heavy session recording or credential rotation requirements.
- Connectors to less common applications require custom development, and each one adds a maintenance burden that reappears every time the target application changes its API.
Shufti Pro
- Rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- Accuracy on difficult document types trails the premium vendors, and the saving per check is often consumed by the manual review headcount handling the additional referrals.
- The enterprise assurance profile is thinner than that of larger competitors, so regulated bank procurement teams frequently rule it out at the vendor risk stage rather than on capability.
- Support responsiveness scales with contract size, and pay as you go customers have limited recourse when a document type suddenly starts failing in one market.
- Country coverage is broad but uneven in depth, meaning the same product can perform very differently across two markets you are launching in simultaneously.
Pricing, plan by plan
Saviynt
On request- Saviynt Identity Cloud$undefined/year
- Priced per governed identity per year
- Modules for governance, privileged access and cloud entitlements
- SaaS delivery with FedRAMP authorised offering available
Shufti Pro
On request- Pay as you go$undefined/month
- Consumption billing with no annual commitment
- Rate quoted by sales, not published
- Resubmission sessions stated as not billable
- Monthly commitment$undefined/month
- Lower per-verification rate against a volume commitment
- AML screening and KYB priced as add-ons
- Free trial available before contracting
Which should you pick?
Choose Shufti Pro if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want facial biometrics.
Questions people ask
- Is Saviynt or Shufti Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. Saviynt starts at On request and Shufti Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Saviynt or Shufti Pro?
- Saviynt starts at On request and Shufti Pro at On request.
- Does Saviynt or Shufti Pro run on more platforms?
- Saviynt runs on Web. Shufti Pro runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Saviynt best used for?
- Saviynt is most often used for an enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviews, a healthcare system governing clinician access to epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaign, a company that has to prove segregation of duties in sap to an external auditor every year, a federal contractor needing an identity governance service with fedramp authorisation. Of those, an enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviews and a healthcare system governing clinician access to epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaign are not what Shufti Pro is typically brought in for.
- What can Saviynt do that Shufti Pro cannot?
- Saviynt covers Identity governance, Access certification, Segregation of duties, Privileged access. Shufti Pro covers Document verification, Facial biometrics, AML screening, KYB verification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Saviynt: Does Saviynt replace a PAM vendor?
It can for time-bound privileged access, but organisations with heavy session recording, credential rotation or legacy server access requirements often keep a dedicated PAM product alongside it.
Shufti Pro: Are failed attempts charged?
Shufti states that resubmission sessions are not charged and that billing follows successful verification attempts. Get that written into the contract, because it materially changes total cost.
Saviynt: Is there a FedRAMP authorised version?
Yes, Saviynt offers a FedRAMP authorised government cloud offering, which matters where that is an eligibility requirement rather than a preference.
Shufti Pro: Is there a published price?
No. Plan structures are published but rates are quoted. Third party estimates put effective cost well below premium vendors.
Saviynt: How is it priced?
Per governed identity per year, quoted. Define carefully whether service accounts and contractors count toward the identity total.
Shufti Pro: Can we start without a commitment?
Yes. A pay as you go option exists, which is unusual in this category and useful for early stage volume.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Saviynt vs One Identity
- Saviynt vs Delinea
- Saviynt vs Omada Identity
- Saviynt vs Infisical
- Saviynt vs Netwrix
- Saviynt vs BeyondTrust
- Saviynt vs Doppler
- Saviynt vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Saviynt vs Speakeasy
- Saviynt vs Chainguard
- Saviynt vs Fenergo
- Saviynt vs Tenable
- Saviynt vs Hanwha Vision
- Saviynt vs Idira
- Saviynt vs IVPN
- Saviynt vs Logto
- Saviynt vs Malwarebytes
- Saviynt vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Saviynt vs Sumsub
- Saviynt vs Jumio
- Saviynt vs Veriff
- Saviynt vs iDenfy
- Saviynt vs Socure
- Saviynt vs IDnow
- Saviynt vs Trulioo
- Saviynt vs Yoti
- Saviynt vs Quantexa
- Saviynt vs NICE Actimize
- Saviynt vs Signicat
- Saviynt vs Keeper Password Manager
- Saviynt vs Keygen
- Saviynt vs KnowBe4
- Saviynt vs Legit Security
- Saviynt vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Saviynt vs Metasploit
- Shufti Pro vs One Identity
- Shufti Pro vs Delinea
- Shufti Pro vs Omada Identity
- Shufti Pro vs Infisical
- Shufti Pro vs Netwrix
- Shufti Pro vs BeyondTrust
- Shufti Pro vs Doppler
- Shufti Pro vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Shufti Pro vs Speakeasy
- Shufti Pro vs Chainguard
- Shufti Pro vs Fenergo
- Shufti Pro vs Tenable
- Shufti Pro vs Hanwha Vision
- Shufti Pro vs Idira
- Shufti Pro vs IVPN
- Shufti Pro vs Logto
- Shufti Pro vs Malwarebytes
- Shufti Pro vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Shufti Pro vs Sumsub
- Shufti Pro vs Jumio
- Shufti Pro vs Veriff
- Shufti Pro vs iDenfy
- Shufti Pro vs Socure
- Shufti Pro vs IDnow
- Shufti Pro vs Trulioo
- Shufti Pro vs Yoti
- Shufti Pro vs Quantexa
- Shufti Pro vs NICE Actimize
- Shufti Pro vs Signicat
- Shufti Pro vs Keeper Password Manager
- Shufti Pro vs Keygen
- Shufti Pro vs KnowBe4
- Shufti Pro vs Legit Security
- Shufti Pro vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Shufti Pro vs Metasploit
