Cybersecurity · head to head
Saviynt vs Sumsub

Saviynt
Cybersecurity
Cloud identity governance with privileged access in the same platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sumsub
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
- From
- $1.35/verification
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Saviynt implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.; Sumsub the published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- They diverge on capability: Saviynt covers Identity governance, Sumsub covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Saviynt and Sumsub actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Saviynt
- Identity governance
- Access certification
- Segregation of duties
- Privileged access
- Cloud entitlements
- Third party access
- Access request
Only in Sumsub
- Document verification
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- No-code flow builder
- Transaction monitoring
- Travel Rule
- Fraud and duplicate detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Saviynt
- An enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviewsnot Sumsub
- A healthcare system governing clinician access to Epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaignnot Sumsub
- A company that has to prove segregation of duties in SAP to an external auditor every yearnot Sumsub
- A federal contractor needing an identity governance service with FedRAMP authorisationnot Sumsub
Sumsub
- A crypto exchange needing KYC plus Travel Rule handling under one contractnot Saviynt
- A gambling operator entering several European markets and needing document coverage without a separate vendor per countrynot Saviynt
- A fintech that wants a published price it can model in a business case before speaking to a salespersonnot Saviynt
- A marketplace verifying both individual sellers and the companies behind them without buying two productsnot Saviynt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Saviynt
- Implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.
- Governance quality is limited by HR and application data quality, so organisations with inconsistent joiner records spend the early phases correcting source data rather than certifying access.
- Pricing is per governed identity, so counting contractors, service accounts and non-employee identities materially changes the bill and the definition is worth negotiating explicitly.
- The privileged access module is younger than the governance core and is not a full substitute for a dedicated PAM product in estates with heavy session recording or credential rotation requirements.
- Connectors to less common applications require custom development, and each one adds a maintenance burden that reappears every time the target application changes its API.
Sumsub
- The published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- You are billed per verification attempt in most configurations, meaning applicant drop-off and resubmissions cost money without producing a customer.
- Pass rates and document support vary noticeably by country, and a market that works well in Europe can produce materially worse rejection rates in parts of Africa and South East Asia.
- The AML screening tier bundles list coverage that large institutions would normally buy separately and tune, giving less control over match thresholds than a dedicated screening vendor.
- The company originated in Russia before restructuring to a UK entity, and some financial institutions still raise that history in vendor risk review, which can slow or block procurement at conservative banks.
Pricing, plan by plan
Saviynt
On request- Saviynt Identity Cloud$undefined/year
- Priced per governed identity per year
- Modules for governance, privileged access and cloud entitlements
- SaaS delivery with FedRAMP authorised offering available
Sumsub
$1.35/verification- Basic$1.35/verification
- 149 USD minimum monthly spend
- Document verification and liveness
- No-code flow builder
- Compliance$1.85/verification
- 299 USD minimum monthly spend
- Everything in Basic
- AML sanctions and PEP screening
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume rate
- Custom jurisdictions and languages
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Sumsub if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aml screening.
Questions people ask
- Is Saviynt or Sumsub better?
- Neither clearly leads. Saviynt starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Saviynt or Sumsub?
- Saviynt starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification.
- Does Saviynt or Sumsub run on more platforms?
- Saviynt runs on Web. Sumsub runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Saviynt best used for?
- Saviynt is most often used for an enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviews, a healthcare system governing clinician access to epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaign, a company that has to prove segregation of duties in sap to an external auditor every year, a federal contractor needing an identity governance service with fedramp authorisation. Of those, an enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviews and a healthcare system governing clinician access to epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaign are not what Sumsub is typically brought in for.
- What can Saviynt do that Sumsub cannot?
- Saviynt covers Identity governance, Access certification, Segregation of duties, Privileged access. Sumsub covers Document verification, AML screening, KYB verification, No-code flow builder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Saviynt: Does Saviynt replace a PAM vendor?
It can for time-bound privileged access, but organisations with heavy session recording, credential rotation or legacy server access requirements often keep a dedicated PAM product alongside it.
Sumsub: What does a verification actually cost?
1.35 USD on Basic and 1.85 USD on Compliance, but with 149 and 299 USD monthly minimums respectively. Below roughly 110 or 160 checks a month you are paying the minimum, not the rate.
Saviynt: Is there a FedRAMP authorised version?
Yes, Saviynt offers a FedRAMP authorised government cloud offering, which matters where that is an eligibility requirement rather than a preference.
Sumsub: Do failed verifications get charged?
Attempts are generally billable, so a poor onboarding funnel raises your bill. Confirm the exact resubmission policy in your contract.
Saviynt: How is it priced?
Per governed identity per year, quoted. Define carefully whether service accounts and contractors count toward the identity total.
Sumsub: Does it cover business verification?
Yes, KYB with company registry lookups and beneficial owner resolution is part of the platform rather than a separate product.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Saviynt vs One Identity
- Saviynt vs Delinea
- Saviynt vs Omada Identity
- Saviynt vs Infisical
- Saviynt vs Netwrix
- Saviynt vs BeyondTrust
- Saviynt vs Doppler
- Saviynt vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Saviynt vs Speakeasy
- Saviynt vs Chainguard
- Saviynt vs Fenergo
- Saviynt vs Tenable
- Saviynt vs Hanwha Vision
- Saviynt vs Idira
- Saviynt vs IVPN
- Saviynt vs Logto
- Saviynt vs Malwarebytes
- Saviynt vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Saviynt vs Shufti Pro
- Saviynt vs Jumio
- Saviynt vs Socure
- Saviynt vs Signicat
- Saviynt vs iDenfy
- Saviynt vs Trulioo
- Saviynt vs Veriff
- Saviynt vs IDnow
- Saviynt vs Quantexa
- Saviynt vs NICE Actimize
- Saviynt vs Yoti
- Saviynt vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Saviynt vs Mimecast
- Saviynt vs Motorola Vigilant
- Saviynt vs Nessus
- Saviynt vs NordPass
- Sumsub vs One Identity
- Sumsub vs Delinea
- Sumsub vs Omada Identity
- Sumsub vs Infisical
- Sumsub vs Netwrix
- Sumsub vs BeyondTrust
- Sumsub vs Doppler
- Sumsub vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Sumsub vs Speakeasy
- Sumsub vs Chainguard
- Sumsub vs Fenergo
- Sumsub vs Tenable
- Sumsub vs Hanwha Vision
- Sumsub vs Idira
- Sumsub vs IVPN
- Sumsub vs Logto
- Sumsub vs Malwarebytes
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Sumsub vs Shufti Pro
- Sumsub vs Jumio
- Sumsub vs Socure
- Sumsub vs Signicat
- Sumsub vs iDenfy
- Sumsub vs Trulioo
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs IDnow
- Sumsub vs Quantexa
- Sumsub vs NICE Actimize
- Sumsub vs Yoti
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sumsub vs Mimecast
- Sumsub vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sumsub vs Nessus
- Sumsub vs NordPass
