Cybersecurity · head to head
Transmit Security vs Yoti

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Yoti
Cybersecurity
Reusable digital identity, facial age estimation and identity verification
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.; Yoti age estimation returns a probabilistic range rather than a verified date of birth, so it only works with a safety buffer above the legal threshold and cannot prove an exact age.
- They diverge on capability: Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Yoti covers Facial age estimation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Transmit Security and Yoti actually diverge.
| Attribute | Transmit Security | Yoti |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
Only in Yoti
- Facial age estimation
- Reusable digital ID
- UK right to work and rent
- Digital ID for retail
- Selective disclosure
Both cover
- Identity verification
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot Yoti
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot Yoti
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot Yoti
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot Yoti
Yoti
- A social platform meeting UK Online Safety Act age assurance duties without collecting identity documents from teenagersnot Transmit Security
- A supermarket removing staff interventions at self-checkout for age-restricted purchasesnot Transmit Security
- A UK employer running digital right-to-work checks under the certified trust framework rather than inspecting passportsnot Transmit Security
- A gambling operator needing an age gate with high completion rates before the account funding stepnot Transmit Security
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Yoti
- Age estimation returns a probabilistic range rather than a verified date of birth, so it only works with a safety buffer above the legal threshold and cannot prove an exact age.
- Estimation accuracy varies by demographic and reported error margins widen at the age bands that matter most for eighteen-year thresholds, which pushes borderline users into a document fallback you still have to pay for.
- Pricing is not published, so buyers cannot compare the cost of an estimation check against a document check without going through sales.
- Regulatory acceptance of facial estimation differs by jurisdiction, so a method that satisfies Ofcom may not satisfy a regulator elsewhere and multi-market platforms need more than one approach.
- The reusable digital identity app depends on consumer adoption, which is meaningful in the UK and thin elsewhere, limiting the reusability benefit outside its home market.
Pricing, plan by plan
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Yoti
On request- Yoti Age and Identity Services$undefined/year
- Per-check pricing quoted by volume and method
- Age estimation, document verification and digital ID priced differently
- Right to work and right to rent checks quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Choose Yoti if
- You need facial age estimation.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want reusable digital id.
Questions people ask
- Is Transmit Security or Yoti better?
- Neither clearly leads. Transmit Security starts at On request and Yoti at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Transmit Security or Yoti?
- Transmit Security starts at On request and Yoti at On request.
- Does Transmit Security or Yoti run on more platforms?
- Transmit Security runs on Web, iOS, Android. Yoti runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Transmit Security best used for?
- Transmit Security is most often used for a bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration step, an insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside it, a retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkout, an organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liability. Of those, a bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration step and an insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside it are not what Yoti is typically brought in for.
- What can Transmit Security do that Yoti cannot?
- Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Orchestration, Account recovery. Yoti covers Facial age estimation, Reusable digital ID, UK right to work and rent, Digital ID for retail. Both handle Identity verification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Transmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
Yoti: Does age estimation store my face?
The image is used to produce an estimate and then deleted rather than retained, which is the specific property that makes it usable for age assurance on minors.
Transmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
Yoti: Is it accepted for UK Online Safety Act compliance?
Facial age estimation is one of the methods regulators have accepted as highly effective age assurance. Confirm the current position with your own counsel for your content category.
Transmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
Yoti: Can it prove someone is exactly 21?
No. It gives a range. If you need a precise age you need a document or database check, which Yoti also sells.
Related pages
More on Transmit Security
Other head to heads
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs Veriff
- Transmit Security vs iDenfy
- Transmit Security vs IDnow
- Transmit Security vs Shufti Pro
- Transmit Security vs Sumsub
- Transmit Security vs Jumio
- Transmit Security vs Signicat
- Transmit Security vs LogicManager
- Transmit Security vs Delinea
- Transmit Security vs Very Good Security
- Transmit Security vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Transmit Security vs Windscribe
- Transmit Security vs authentik
- Transmit Security vs Avast One
- Transmit Security vs Chainguard
- Yoti vs Descope
- Yoti vs NICE Actimize
- Yoti vs Beyond Identity
- Yoti vs Sardine
- Yoti vs Feedzai
- Yoti vs Socure
- Yoti vs Unit21
- Yoti vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Yoti vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Yoti vs Ping Identity
- Yoti vs Stytch
- Yoti vs Rhombus Systems
- Yoti vs Semgrep
- Yoti vs Spot AI
- Yoti vs Syft
- Yoti vs ThetaRay
- Yoti vs Trivy
- Yoti vs Trulioo
- Yoti vs Veriff
- Yoti vs iDenfy
- Yoti vs IDnow
- Yoti vs Shufti Pro
- Yoti vs Sumsub
- Yoti vs Jumio
- Yoti vs Signicat
- Yoti vs LogicManager
- Yoti vs Delinea
- Yoti vs Very Good Security
- Yoti vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Yoti vs Windscribe
- Yoti vs authentik
- Yoti vs Avast One
- Yoti vs Chainguard
