Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Sardine

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sardine
Cybersecurity
Device intelligence and behaviour biometrics for fraud and compliance
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Sardine signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, Sardine covers Device intelligence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Sardine actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Sardine
- Device intelligence
- Behaviour biometrics
- Scam detection
- Onboarding risk scoring
- AML transaction monitoring
- Dispute and chargeback handling
- Rules editor
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Sardine
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Sardine
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Sardine
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Sardine
Sardine
- A neobank losing money to authorised push payment scams where the customer genuinely approved the transfernot Acunetix
- A crypto exchange trying to detect accounts being operated by remote access rather than by their ownernot Acunetix
- A fintech seeing synthetic identity signups that pass document verification but share device characteristicsnot Acunetix
- A lender wanting first party fraud signals at application time that a credit bureau file does not containnot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Sardine
- Signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.
- Behavioural and device telemetry collection needs a documented lawful basis under GDPR, and EU privacy reviews frequently delay rollouts that were scoped as engineering work.
- Pricing is per session or per active user, so a consumer product with many low value sessions pays in proportion to traffic rather than to fraud exposure.
- As a younger private company it lacks the enforcement-tested audit history that a bank examiner expects, which makes it a harder sell inside a regulated bank than inside a fintech.
- It is strongest on session-time signals and weaker as a system of record for long horizon AML typologies, so larger institutions end up running it alongside a traditional monitoring platform rather than instead of one.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Sardine
On request- Sardine$undefined/year
- Priced per user session or per monthly active user
- Annual contract with volume commitment
- SDK for web, iOS and Android
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose Sardine if
- You need device intelligence.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want behaviour biometrics.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Sardine better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Sardine at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Sardine?
- Acunetix starts at On request and Sardine at On request.
- Does Acunetix or Sardine run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Sardine runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Sardine is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Sardine cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. Sardine covers Device intelligence, Behaviour biometrics, Scam detection, Onboarding risk scoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceSardine: Does Sardine do document verification?
It focuses on device, behavioural and transaction signals, and integrates identity verification providers rather than being one. Treat it as complementary to a KYC vendor.
Sardine: What does it need from us to work?
An SDK in your web and mobile applications plus transaction feeds. Without the client side collector you lose the signals that differentiate it.
Sardine: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted, typically per session or per monthly active user with an annual volume commitment.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs Unit21
- Acunetix vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Acunetix vs Feedzai
- Acunetix vs NICE Actimize
- Acunetix vs Socure
- Acunetix vs ThetaRay
- Acunetix vs Transmit Security
- Acunetix vs Jumio
- Acunetix vs iDenfy
- Acunetix vs Silent Eight
- Acunetix vs Sumsub
- Acunetix vs Quantexa
- Acunetix vs TunnelBear
- Acunetix vs Vanta
- Acunetix vs Authelia
- Sardine vs Norton 360
- Sardine vs 1Password
- Sardine vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Sardine vs LastPass
- Sardine vs Burp Suite
- Sardine vs Veracode
- Sardine vs Nessus
- Sardine vs OWASP ZAP
- Sardine vs Arnica
- Sardine vs Doppler
- Sardine vs Aikido
- Sardine vs NordPass
- Sardine vs One Identity
- Sardine vs Ory Kratos
- Sardine vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Sardine vs Tenable Nessus
- Sardine vs Unit21
- Sardine vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sardine vs Feedzai
- Sardine vs NICE Actimize
- Sardine vs Socure
- Sardine vs ThetaRay
- Sardine vs Transmit Security
- Sardine vs Jumio
- Sardine vs iDenfy
- Sardine vs Silent Eight
- Sardine vs Sumsub
- Sardine vs Quantexa
- Sardine vs TunnelBear
- Sardine vs Vanta
- Sardine vs Authelia
