Softwr

Marketing · head to head

Invoca vs Roxhill

Invoca logo

Invoca

Marketing

Call tracking and conversation analytics that ties inbound phone calls back to paid marketing spend

From
On request
Rated
-
Roxhill logo

Roxhill

Marketing

UK-focused journalist database and media monitoring, founder-owned and annual only

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Invoca entry pricing commonly starts around 1,500 US dollars a month before call minutes, plus a setup and training fee, which prices out agencies and small businesses that only need attribution for a few hundred calls.; Roxhill the database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
  • They diverge on capability: Invoca covers Dynamic number insertion, Roxhill covers Journalist database.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Invoca and Roxhill actually diverge.

Attributes where Invoca and Roxhill differ
AttributeInvocaRoxhill
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Invoca

  • Dynamic number insertion
  • Signal AI
  • Ad platform integration
  • Call transcription
  • PreSense
  • Call routing
  • Quality management
  • Compliance redaction

Only in Roxhill

  • Journalist database
  • Journalist profiles
  • Media lists and distribution
  • Media requests and alerts
  • Media monitoring
  • Bespoke newsletters
  • Historical search
  • Journalist Assistant

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Invoca

  • A multi-location healthcare group proving which paid search keywords produce booked appointments rather than just call volumenot Roxhill
  • An insurance carrier feeding qualified call outcomes back into Google Ads so bidding optimises on written policies instead of raw callsnot Roxhill
  • An automotive dealer group working out which regional campaigns generate service bookings versus tyre-kicker enquiriesnot Roxhill
  • A home services franchisor allocating budget across franchisees by attributing revenue-producing calls to the campaigns that caused themnot Roxhill

Roxhill

  • A UK in-house press office that needs journalist contacts with current pitching preferences rather than a scraped byline list.not Invoca
  • An agency tracking forward features across UK trade and consumer titles to place clients into planned coverage months ahead.not Invoca
  • A communications team monitoring named spokespeople and measuring their share of voice against competitors in UK media.not Invoca
  • A UK public sector body procuring through G-Cloud that needs EEA-hosted media monitoring with a published framework price band.not Invoca

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Invoca

  • Entry pricing commonly starts around 1,500 US dollars a month before call minutes, plus a setup and training fee, which prices out agencies and small businesses that only need attribution for a few hundred calls.
  • Telephony minutes and tracking numbers are metered separately from the platform fee, so a seasonal advertising spike produces an invoice nobody forecast.
  • Signal AI, PreSense and quality management are frequently sold as add-on modules rather than included, meaning the demo you were shown may cost noticeably more than the quote you were given.
  • Contracts are annual or multi-year with usage minimums and no month-to-month option, so a campaign strategy that shifts away from phone calls leaves you paying for capacity you no longer use.
  • The product is deep on inbound phone attribution and shallow elsewhere; if your buying journey also involves chat, forms and in-store visits, Invoca covers only one channel and you still need a separate attribution model for the rest.

Roxhill

  • The database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
  • Contact records go stale: reviewers report old email addresses and phone numbers, distribution bounces, and there is no self-serve verification step before you send.
  • At roughly 200,000 to 300,000 journalists it is far smaller than the million-plus figures Cision and Prowly claim, with repeated complaints about thin trade, academic and journal coverage.
  • Selling is annual only with no monthly plan and a trial functionally restricted to around two weeks, so you cannot genuinely pilot before a twelve-month commitment, which is a poor fit for project or retainer agency work.
  • Licence bands are 1, 3 and 5 seats, and extra logins, workspaces, smart folders, historical search, share of voice and the spokespeople platform are all chargeable add-ons, so a team of eight to fifteen pays well above any headline band.
  • Search behaviour is described as counter-intuitive and sometimes returns implausibly few results, which means a null result cannot be trusted and lists need manual cross-checking.
  • Monitoring accuracy takes time to settle after switching, so coverage is missed in the first weeks after a cutover, which is a real gap risk if you time the migration badly.

Pricing, plan by plan

Invoca

On request
  • Pro$undefined/year
    • Around 6,000 annual local or toll-free numbers
    • 5 custom Signals
    • Dynamic number insertion
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Around 12,000 annual numbers
    • 50 custom Signals
    • Advanced routing
  • Elite$undefined/year
    • Around 18,000 annual numbers
    • 100 custom Signals
    • Full analytics suite
  • Performance Professional$undefined/year
    • Pay-per-call network features
    • Publisher and affiliate call tracking
    • Payout management

Roxhill

On request
  • Core$undefined/year
    • 1 licence
    • Standard database access
    • Journalist Assistant
  • Boutique$undefined/year
    • 3 licences
    • Adds press release distribution
    • 3 workspaces, 6 smart folders, 10 spokespeople, 3 newsletters
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • 5 licences
    • 5 workspaces, 10 smart folders, 5 newsletters
    • Spokespeople platform
  • Premium$undefined/year
    • Everything in Enterprise
    • Insights analysis and bespoke reporting
    • Competitor share of voice

Which should you pick?

Choose Invoca if

  • You need dynamic number insertion.
  • You also want signal ai.

Choose Roxhill if

  • You need journalist database.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want journalist profiles.

Questions people ask

Is Invoca or Roxhill better?
Neither clearly leads. Invoca starts at On request and Roxhill at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Invoca or Roxhill?
Invoca starts at On request and Roxhill at On request.
Does Invoca or Roxhill run on more platforms?
Invoca runs on Web. Roxhill runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Invoca best used for?
Invoca is most often used for a multi-location healthcare group proving which paid search keywords produce booked appointments rather than just call volume, an insurance carrier feeding qualified call outcomes back into google ads so bidding optimises on written policies instead of raw calls, an automotive dealer group working out which regional campaigns generate service bookings versus tyre-kicker enquiries, a home services franchisor allocating budget across franchisees by attributing revenue-producing calls to the campaigns that caused them. Of those, a multi-location healthcare group proving which paid search keywords produce booked appointments rather than just call volume and an insurance carrier feeding qualified call outcomes back into google ads so bidding optimises on written policies instead of raw calls are not what Roxhill is typically brought in for.
What can Invoca do that Roxhill cannot?
Invoca covers Dynamic number insertion, Signal AI, Ad platform integration, Call transcription. Roxhill covers Journalist database, Journalist profiles, Media lists and distribution, Media requests and alerts.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Invoca: Does Invoca publish prices?

No. Every deal is quoted from call volume, number count and which modules you licence. Independent reports put the entry point near 1,500 US dollars a month plus minutes.

Roxhill: How much does Roxhill cost?

Not published on the vendor site, but the UK G-Cloud 14 listing discloses £6,450 to £25,000 per instance per year. Use that as your anchor.

Invoca: Is this different from CallRail?

Yes, in ambition and price. Invoca targets enterprise attribution with automated outcome classification fed back to ad bidding; lighter call tracking tools stop at source attribution.

Roxhill: Is Roxhill owned by Cision or Access Intelligence?

No. Companies House shows a single individual holding over 75% of shares and no corporate PSC. It is founder-controlled and unfunded. Note the founder previously sold Gorkana to Cision, so ask for a change-of-control clause.

Invoca: Is it HIPAA compatible?

Invoca sells heavily into healthcare and offers redaction and compliance controls for regulated recordings; confirm the specific terms in your contract.

Roxhill: Is it usable for US or APAC media relations?

Not well. Reviewers describe US, Australian and Asian coverage as materially weaker than UK. Budget for a second database.

Invoca: Do we need a contact centre platform as well?

Yes. Invoca tracks and analyses calls, it does not run your contact centre.

Roxhill: Can I buy monthly?

No. Contracts are annual, sales-gated, with a trial of around two weeks.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads