Business Intelligence · head to head
Pigment vs Rill Data

Pigment
Business Intelligence
Enterprise business planning platform for finance, sales and workforce modelling
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Rill Data
Business Intelligence
Local-first BI on DuckDB and ClickHouse with dashboards defined as code
- From
- $20/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Pigment no pricing is published and the structure has three moving parts, platform fee, use-case fees and tiered seats, so two companies of the same size can pay very different amounts and neither can benchmark the other.; Rill Data the seat price of 20 dollars is misleading as a budget figure: Rill’s own calculator puts a small two-seat project at around 256 dollars a month, with compute making up the great majority.
- They diverge on capability: Pigment covers Dimensional modelling, Rill Data covers Local development.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Pigment and Rill Data actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Business Intelligence).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Pigment
- Dimensional modelling
- Scenario planning
- Data connectors
- Application blocks
- Reporting and boards
- Access control
- Audit trail
- AI assistance
Only in Rill Data
- Local development
- Dashboards as code
- Embedded DuckDB
- Bring your own database
- Alerts and scheduled reports
- Embedded analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Pigment
- A finance team retiring a fragile Excel consolidation that no one can audit and only one person can runnot Rill Data
- Sales operations modelling quota, territory and headcount capacity against a revenue plan in the same system finance usesnot Rill Data
- A company that needs monthly re-forecasting fast enough to run scenarios live in the leadership meetingnot Rill Data
- Replacing an ageing Anaplan estate where the model has become unmaintainable and per-workspace costs have crept upnot Rill Data
Rill Data
- An analytics team that wants dashboard changes to go through code review rather than being edited in a web UInot Pigment
- Interactive exploration of event-scale data where a warehouse round trip per filter click is too slownot Pigment
- Embedding fast slice-and-dice dashboards into a product where the underlying store is already ClickHouse or Druidnot Pigment
- A data engineer prototyping a metrics layer locally on a laptop before committing to any cloud spendnot Pigment
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Pigment
- No pricing is published and the structure has three moving parts, platform fee, use-case fees and tiered seats, so two companies of the same size can pay very different amounts and neither can benchmark the other.
- Cost scales with planning processes rather than with company size, so a successful first deployment creates internal demand that directly increases the bill at renewal.
- It requires a modelling owner. Without a person who understands dimensional design, teams rebuild spreadsheet patterns in Pigment and inherit all the maintenance problems they were trying to escape.
- Implementation is partner-led and measured in months, so the payback horizon is long compared with lighter FP&A tools that a controller can configure alone.
- The connector library covers major systems well but the long tail is thinner than the incumbents, and industry-specific source systems often need a warehouse or a file drop in between.
Rill Data
- The seat price of 20 dollars is misleading as a budget figure: Rill’s own calculator puts a small two-seat project at around 256 dollars a month, with compute making up the great majority.
- Dashboards are defined in YAML and SQL, so business users cannot create or change one without a developer and a Git workflow, which stalls self-service adoption.
- It is built for the explore-a-metric pattern and does not produce pixel-perfect financial or operational reports, so most organisations still need a second reporting tool.
- AI tokens and API calls are quota-limited per seat, with API overage at a cent per call, so programmatic consumers can create an unbudgeted line item.
- As a smaller vendor competing against Looker, Tableau and Power BI, the ecosystem of consultants, templates and trained analysts is thin, which raises the cost of hiring for it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Pigment
On request- Pigment platform$undefined/year
- Platform fee plus per use-case fees
- Licences tiered as editor, contributor and explorer
- No free tier and no self-service signup
Rill Data
$20/month- Starter$20/month
- Per seat, up to twenty seats
- Three projects
- Compute at 0.15 USD per compute unit hour
- Growth$30/month
- Per seat, up to one hundred seats
- Ten projects
- Compute at 0.20 USD per compute unit hour
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Annual platform licence with negotiated capacity
- Unlimited seats and projects
- Dedicated infrastructure
Which should you pick?
Choose Rill Data if
- You need local development.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want dashboards as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Pigment or Rill Data better?
- Neither clearly leads. Pigment starts at On request and Rill Data at $20/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Pigment or Rill Data?
- Pigment starts at On request and Rill Data at $20/month.
- Does Pigment or Rill Data run on more platforms?
- Pigment runs on Web. Rill Data runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- What is Pigment best used for?
- Pigment is most often used for a finance team retiring a fragile excel consolidation that no one can audit and only one person can run, sales operations modelling quota, territory and headcount capacity against a revenue plan in the same system finance uses, a company that needs monthly re-forecasting fast enough to run scenarios live in the leadership meeting, replacing an ageing anaplan estate where the model has become unmaintainable and per-workspace costs have crept up. Of those, a finance team retiring a fragile excel consolidation that no one can audit and only one person can run and sales operations modelling quota, territory and headcount capacity against a revenue plan in the same system finance uses are not what Rill Data is typically brought in for.
- What can Pigment do that Rill Data cannot?
- Pigment covers Dimensional modelling, Scenario planning, Data connectors, Application blocks. Rill Data covers Local development, Dashboards as code, Embedded DuckDB, Bring your own database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Pigment: Does Pigment publish prices?
No. Expect a quote combining a platform fee, fees per planning use case, and seat licences split into editor, contributor and explorer tiers.
Rill Data: Is Rill open source?
The Rill developer binary is open source and free to run locally; Rill Cloud is the paid product.
Pigment: Is Pigment an alternative to Anaplan?
It is positioned directly against Anaplan and much of its customer base is migrating from it, mainly citing modelling readability and recalculation speed.
Rill Data: How much does it actually cost?
Seats start at 20 USD per month, but hosted compute at 0.15 USD per compute unit hour typically dominates the bill. Bringing your own database removes the usage fee.
Pigment: Can we use it without consultants?
In practice most deployments use Pigment or a partner for the initial build. Ongoing model changes can be handled in-house once someone owns the modelling discipline.
Rill Data: Can business users build dashboards?
Not directly. Dashboards are YAML and SQL under version control.
Pigment: Where is data hosted?
Pigment is a European vendor with regional hosting options, which is often the deciding factor for EU buyers with data residency requirements.
Rill Data: Which databases can back a deployed project?
DuckDB, ClickHouse, Druid, Pinot, Snowflake and others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Pigment vs Jedox
- Pigment vs Board International
- Pigment vs Anaplan
- Pigment vs Cube
- Pigment vs Hebbia
- Pigment vs Zenlytic
- Pigment vs Amazon QuickSight
- Pigment vs ThoughtSpot
- Pigment vs Google Data Studio
- Pigment vs Periscope Data
- Pigment vs Cyfe
- Pigment vs DashThis
- Pigment vs Snowplow
- Pigment vs Stripe Dashboard
- Pigment vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Pigment vs Yellowfin
- Pigment vs Zebra BI
- Pigment vs Lightdash
- Pigment vs Hex
- Pigment vs Grow
- Pigment vs Klipfolio
- Pigment vs Deepnote
- Pigment vs Luzmo
- Pigment vs Reportz
- Pigment vs Evidence
- Pigment vs Fabi
- Pigment vs NetBase Quid
- Pigment vs Phocas
- Pigment vs Preset
- Pigment vs ProfitWell
- Pigment vs Quantum Metric
- Rill Data vs Jedox
- Rill Data vs Board International
- Rill Data vs Anaplan
- Rill Data vs Cube
- Rill Data vs Hebbia
- Rill Data vs Zenlytic
- Rill Data vs Amazon QuickSight
- Rill Data vs ThoughtSpot
- Rill Data vs Google Data Studio
- Rill Data vs Periscope Data
- Rill Data vs Cyfe
- Rill Data vs DashThis
- Rill Data vs Snowplow
- Rill Data vs Stripe Dashboard
- Rill Data vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Rill Data vs Yellowfin
- Rill Data vs Zebra BI
- Rill Data vs Lightdash
- Rill Data vs Hex
- Rill Data vs Grow
- Rill Data vs Klipfolio
- Rill Data vs Deepnote
- Rill Data vs Luzmo
- Rill Data vs Reportz
- Rill Data vs Evidence
- Rill Data vs Fabi
- Rill Data vs NetBase Quid
- Rill Data vs Phocas
- Rill Data vs Preset
- Rill Data vs ProfitWell
- Rill Data vs Quantum Metric
