Business Intelligence · head to head
Pigment vs Zebra BI

Pigment
Business Intelligence
Enterprise business planning platform for finance, sales and workforce modelling
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Zebra BI
Business Intelligence
IBCS-based charting add-ins that replace native visuals in Power BI, Excel and PowerPoint
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Zebra BI has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Pigment no pricing is published and the structure has three moving parts, platform fee, use-case fees and tiered seats, so two companies of the same size can pay very different amounts and neither can benchmark the other.; Zebra BI every viewer needs a licence, not only report authors, so distributing a report to fifty managers means buying the fifty-user bracket regardless of how few people build reports.
- They diverge on capability: Pigment covers Dimensional modelling, Zebra BI covers IBCS-compliant visuals.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Pigment and Zebra BI actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Business Intelligence).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Pigment
- Dimensional modelling
- Scenario planning
- Data connectors
- Application blocks
- Reporting and boards
- Access control
- Audit trail
- AI assistance
Only in Zebra BI
- IBCS-compliant visuals
- Variance analysis
- Small multiples
- Integrated commentary
- Excel and PowerPoint add-in
- Free personal edition
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Pigment
- A finance team retiring a fragile Excel consolidation that no one can audit and only one person can runnot Zebra BI
- Sales operations modelling quota, territory and headcount capacity against a revenue plan in the same system finance usesnot Zebra BI
- A company that needs monthly re-forecasting fast enough to run scenarios live in the leadership meetingnot Zebra BI
- Replacing an ageing Anaplan estate where the model has become unmaintainable and per-workspace costs have crept upnot Zebra BI
Zebra BI
- A controlling function standardising every management report on IBCS notation so variance is read the same way across divisionsnot Pigment
- Monthly board packs where actual against budget against forecast must appear in one chart without three separate visualsnot Pigment
- An Excel-first finance team that wants IBCS charts without migrating to Power BInot Pigment
- A PowerPoint deck that needs charts to refresh from the underlying model rather than being pasted imagesnot Pigment
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Pigment
- No pricing is published and the structure has three moving parts, platform fee, use-case fees and tiered seats, so two companies of the same size can pay very different amounts and neither can benchmark the other.
- Cost scales with planning processes rather than with company size, so a successful first deployment creates internal demand that directly increases the bill at renewal.
- It requires a modelling owner. Without a person who understands dimensional design, teams rebuild spreadsheet patterns in Pigment and inherit all the maintenance problems they were trying to escape.
- Implementation is partner-led and measured in months, so the payback horizon is long compared with lighter FP&A tools that a controller can configure alone.
- The connector library covers major systems well but the long tail is thinner than the incumbents, and industry-specific source systems often need a warehouse or a file drop in between.
Zebra BI
- Every viewer needs a licence, not only report authors, so distributing a report to fifty managers means buying the fifty-user bracket regardless of how few people build reports.
- Power BI and Office are licensed separately, so a finance team using both Excel and Power BI pays two subscriptions for the same chart grammar.
- The visuals deliberately restrict chart types to enforce IBCS, which makes Zebra BI unsuitable for exploratory analysis or any team that wants unconventional visualisations.
- List prices rise after the first year on the discounted tiers, so the second-year renewal is materially higher than the figure that got the purchase approved.
- As a third-party custom visual it depends on Microsoft not changing the Power BI visuals API, and organisations with locked-down tenants often need IT approval before a custom visual can be used at all.
Pricing, plan by plan
Pigment
On request- Pigment platform$undefined/year
- Platform fee plus per use-case fees
- Licences tiered as editor, contributor and explorer
- No free tier and no self-service signup
Zebra BI
Free- PersonalFree
- Single user
- Zebra BI branding on visuals
- Limited sharing and collaboration
- Power BI Starter$50/month
- Ten users
- No watermark
- Standard support
- Power BI Business$316/month
- Fifty users
- Business feature set
- Priority support
- Office Starter$68/month
- Ten users
- Excel and PowerPoint add-ins
- Billed annually
Which should you pick?
Choose Zebra BI if
- You need ibcs-compliant visuals.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS.
- You also want variance analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is Pigment or Zebra BI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Pigment starts at On request and Zebra BI at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Pigment or Zebra BI?
- Zebra BI has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Pigment and Free for Zebra BI.
- Does Pigment or Zebra BI run on more platforms?
- Pigment runs on Web. Zebra BI runs on Web, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use Zebra BI for free?
- Yes. Zebra BI has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Pigment starts at On request.
- What is Pigment best used for?
- Pigment is most often used for a finance team retiring a fragile excel consolidation that no one can audit and only one person can run, sales operations modelling quota, territory and headcount capacity against a revenue plan in the same system finance uses, a company that needs monthly re-forecasting fast enough to run scenarios live in the leadership meeting, replacing an ageing anaplan estate where the model has become unmaintainable and per-workspace costs have crept up. Of those, a finance team retiring a fragile excel consolidation that no one can audit and only one person can run and sales operations modelling quota, territory and headcount capacity against a revenue plan in the same system finance uses are not what Zebra BI is typically brought in for.
- What can Pigment do that Zebra BI cannot?
- Pigment covers Dimensional modelling, Scenario planning, Data connectors, Application blocks. Zebra BI covers IBCS-compliant visuals, Variance analysis, Small multiples, Integrated commentary.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Pigment: Does Pigment publish prices?
No. Expect a quote combining a platform fee, fees per planning use case, and seat licences split into editor, contributor and explorer tiers.
Zebra BI: Do report viewers need a licence?
Yes. All users, designers and viewers, need one. Only anonymous viewers of publicly published reports are exempt.
Pigment: Is Pigment an alternative to Anaplan?
It is positioned directly against Anaplan and much of its customer base is migrating from it, mainly citing modelling readability and recalculation speed.
Zebra BI: Is there a free version?
Yes, a single-user personal edition with Zebra BI branding and limited sharing.
Pigment: Can we use it without consultants?
In practice most deployments use Pigment or a partner for the initial build. Ongoing model changes can be handled in-house once someone owns the modelling discipline.
Zebra BI: Are Excel and Power BI covered by one licence?
No. The Office add-in and the Power BI visuals are separate subscriptions.
Pigment: Where is data hosted?
Pigment is a European vendor with regional hosting options, which is often the deciding factor for EU buyers with data residency requirements.
Zebra BI: What is IBCS?
International Business Communication Standards, a notation standard for business charts that Zebra BI implements by default.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Pigment vs Jedox
- Pigment vs Board International
- Pigment vs Anaplan
- Pigment vs Cube
- Pigment vs Hebbia
- Pigment vs Zenlytic
- Pigment vs Amazon QuickSight
- Pigment vs ThoughtSpot
- Pigment vs Google Data Studio
- Pigment vs Periscope Data
- Pigment vs Cyfe
- Pigment vs DashThis
- Pigment vs Snowplow
- Pigment vs Stripe Dashboard
- Pigment vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Pigment vs Yellowfin
- Pigment vs Power BI
- Pigment vs Qlik Sense
- Pigment vs Fabi
- Pigment vs MicroStrategy
- Pigment vs Domo
- Pigment vs Deepnote
- Pigment vs Mode
- Pigment vs Zoho Analytics
- Pigment vs Geckoboard
- Pigment vs Glassbox
- Pigment vs Glean
- Pigment vs Grow
- Zebra BI vs Jedox
- Zebra BI vs Board International
- Zebra BI vs Anaplan
- Zebra BI vs Cube
- Zebra BI vs Hebbia
- Zebra BI vs Zenlytic
- Zebra BI vs Amazon QuickSight
- Zebra BI vs ThoughtSpot
- Zebra BI vs Google Data Studio
- Zebra BI vs Periscope Data
- Zebra BI vs Cyfe
- Zebra BI vs DashThis
- Zebra BI vs Snowplow
- Zebra BI vs Stripe Dashboard
- Zebra BI vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Zebra BI vs Yellowfin
- Zebra BI vs Power BI
- Zebra BI vs Qlik Sense
- Zebra BI vs Fabi
- Zebra BI vs MicroStrategy
- Zebra BI vs Domo
- Zebra BI vs Deepnote
- Zebra BI vs Mode
- Zebra BI vs Zoho Analytics
- Zebra BI vs Geckoboard
- Zebra BI vs Glassbox
- Zebra BI vs Glean
- Zebra BI vs Grow
