Cybersecurity · head to head
One Identity vs Veracode

One Identity
Cybersecurity
Quest-owned identity governance, PAM and Active Directory management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Veracode
Cybersecurity
Application risk management platform for finding and fixing software vulnerabilities.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: One Identity the portfolio is assembled from separate acquisitions, so components are separately licensed, separately administered and do not present one console, which raises operational cost.; Veracode no public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- They diverge on capability: One Identity covers Identity Manager, Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST).
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which One Identity and Veracode actually diverge.
| Attribute | One Identity | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Windows, Linux | web, api |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in One Identity
- Identity Manager
- Safeguard
- Active Roles
- OneLogin
- Password Manager
- syslog-ng
- Starling connectors
Only in Veracode
- Static analysis (SAST)
- Dynamic analysis (DAST)
- Software composition analysis
- AI-driven code remediation
- Container security
- Risk Manager (ASPM)
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
One Identity
- An organisation whose authoritative directory will remain on premises Active Directory and needs delegated administration with attribute-level controlnot Veracode
- A government or defence environment requiring privileged session management on a hardened physical appliance rather than a cloud servicenot Veracode
- A manufacturer with SAP and Active Directory needing provisioning governed under one certification processnot Veracode
- An enterprise consolidating Active Directory after an acquisition and needing automated account lifecycle across both forestsnot Veracode
Veracode
- Scanning applications for vulnerabilities across the SDLCnot One Identity
- Automating remediation of flagged security flaws with AInot One Identity
- Securing containerized workloads before deploymentnot One Identity
- Running penetration tests as a managed servicenot One Identity
- Enforcing security policy governance across many applicationsnot One Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
One Identity
- The portfolio is assembled from separate acquisitions, so components are separately licensed, separately administered and do not present one console, which raises operational cost.
- Identity Manager implementations are customisation-heavy and commonly run over a year, with the services spend exceeding the licence cost in the first year.
- Quest has changed private equity ownership more than once since the Dell separation, and buyers should ask directly about product investment commitments before signing a multi-year deal.
- Product documentation and support sit behind a customer portal, which makes independent evaluation before purchase harder than with vendors that publish openly.
- The cloud-native and developer experience trails the pure-play identity vendors, so organisations moving decisively to SaaS applications find the on premises heritage becomes a constraint rather than an asset.
Veracode
- No public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- Full platform capability spans many modules, which can require significant onboarding.
- Package Firewall and PTaaS are separate add-ons rather than included by default.
- Primarily built for enterprise scale, less suited to small individual projects.
Pricing, plan by plan
One Identity
On request- Identity Manager$undefined/year
- Priced per managed identity
- On premises or hosted
- Access certification and provisioning
- Safeguard$undefined/year
- Priced per privileged user or per appliance
- Hardened appliance option for session management
- Licensed separately from Identity Manager
- Active Roles$undefined/year
- Priced per managed Active Directory account
- Delegated administration and automated provisioning
- Licensed separately
Veracode
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Veracode review.
Which should you pick?
Choose One Identity if
- You need identity manager.
- You work on Web, Windows, Linux.
- You also want safeguard.
Choose Veracode if
- You need static analysis (sast).
- You work on web, api.
- You also want dynamic analysis (dast).
Questions people ask
- Is One Identity or Veracode better?
- Neither clearly leads. One Identity starts at On request and Veracode at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, One Identity or Veracode?
- One Identity starts at On request and Veracode at On request.
- Does One Identity or Veracode run on more platforms?
- One Identity runs on Web, Windows, Linux. Veracode runs on web, api.
- What is One Identity best used for?
- One Identity is most often used for an organisation whose authoritative directory will remain on premises active directory and needs delegated administration with attribute-level control, a government or defence environment requiring privileged session management on a hardened physical appliance rather than a cloud service, a manufacturer with sap and active directory needing provisioning governed under one certification process, an enterprise consolidating active directory after an acquisition and needing automated account lifecycle across both forests. Of those, an organisation whose authoritative directory will remain on premises active directory and needs delegated administration with attribute-level control and a government or defence environment requiring privileged session management on a hardened physical appliance rather than a cloud service are not what Veracode is typically brought in for.
- What can One Identity do that Veracode cannot?
- One Identity covers Identity Manager, Safeguard, Active Roles, OneLogin. Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST), Dynamic analysis (DAST), Software composition analysis, AI-driven code remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
One Identity: Is One Identity the same company as Quest?
Yes. One Identity is Quest Software's identity and access management business unit, not a separate vendor.
Veracode: How does Veracode pricing work?
Veracode does not publish pricing on their website. Organizations must request a personalized demo or contact sales to receive quotes tailored to their specific needs and usage volume.
SourceOne Identity: Does it include privileged access?
Safeguard provides it, but it is licensed separately from Identity Manager. Neither includes the other.
Veracode: Does Veracode offer a free trial or free version?
No information about free trials or free versions is provided on Veracode's public website. Organizations must contact sales to discuss trial options.
SourceOne Identity: Why choose this over SailPoint or Saviynt?
Almost always because of Active Directory depth via Active Roles or an appliance requirement for privileged sessions. For cloud-first estates the specialists are the stronger choice.
Related pages
More on One Identity
Other head to heads
- One Identity vs Saviynt
- One Identity vs Delinea
- One Identity vs Omada Identity
- One Identity vs BeyondTrust
- One Identity vs Netwrix
- One Identity vs Infisical
- One Identity vs HashiCorp Boundary
- One Identity vs Teleport
- One Identity vs JumpCloud
- One Identity vs Idira
- One Identity vs March Networks
- One Identity vs Akeyless
- One Identity vs LogicManager
- One Identity vs Mullvad VPN
- One Identity vs Private Internet Access
- One Identity vs Quantexa
- One Identity vs Termly
- One Identity vs Transcend
- One Identity vs Semgrep
- One Identity vs Legit Security
- One Identity vs Aikido
- One Identity vs Snyk
- One Identity vs Endor Labs
- One Identity vs Tenable
- One Identity vs Acunetix
- One Identity vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- One Identity vs Recorded Future
- One Identity vs Tanium
- One Identity vs Trivy
- One Identity vs Grype
- One Identity vs WireGuard
- One Identity vs DataGrail
- Veracode vs Saviynt
- Veracode vs Delinea
- Veracode vs Omada Identity
- Veracode vs BeyondTrust
- Veracode vs Netwrix
- Veracode vs Infisical
- Veracode vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Veracode vs Teleport
- Veracode vs JumpCloud
- Veracode vs Idira
- Veracode vs March Networks
- Veracode vs Akeyless
- Veracode vs LogicManager
- Veracode vs Mullvad VPN
- Veracode vs Private Internet Access
- Veracode vs Quantexa
- Veracode vs Termly
- Veracode vs Transcend
- Veracode vs Semgrep
- Veracode vs Legit Security
- Veracode vs Aikido
- Veracode vs Snyk
- Veracode vs Endor Labs
- Veracode vs Tenable
- Veracode vs Acunetix
- Veracode vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Veracode vs Recorded Future
- Veracode vs Tanium
- Veracode vs Trivy
- Veracode vs Grype
- Veracode vs WireGuard
- Veracode vs DataGrail
