Cybersecurity · head to head
Metasploit vs TunnelBear

Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
TunnelBear
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN with a limited free tier and a bear-themed, beginner-friendly app
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only; TunnelBear free plan's data cap is small compared to competitors offering more generous free allowances.
- They diverge on capability: Metasploit covers Exploit database, TunnelBear covers Encrypted VPN tunnel.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Metasploit and TunnelBear actually diverge.
| Attribute | Metasploit | TunnelBear |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli | windows, mac, linux, ios, android |
| Founded | 2000 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
Only in TunnelBear
- Encrypted VPN tunnel
- Server location switching
- GhostBear obfuscation
- Browser extensions
- Teams account management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot TunnelBear
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot TunnelBear
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot TunnelBear
TunnelBear
- Casual browsing protection on public Wi-Finot Metasploit
- Occasional geo-unblocking with a light free allowancenot Metasploit
- Bypassing network-level VPN blocking via obfuscationnot Metasploit
- Managing VPN access for a small team with centralized billingnot Metasploit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
TunnelBear
- Free plan's data cap is small compared to competitors offering more generous free allowances.
- Lacks advanced features like dedicated IP addresses or split-tunneling controls found in some rival VPNs.
- Server network is smaller than large competitors like NordVPN or ExpressVPN.
- No standalone router-level app, limiting whole-network protection options.
Pricing, plan by plan
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
TunnelBear
Free- FreeFree
- 2GB of data per month
- Access to VPN servers
- Unlimited devices
- Unlimited$9.99/month
- Unlimited monthly data
- All server locations
- Cheaper on annual/3-year billing
- Teams$undefined/month
- Unlimited data
- 5 connected devices per user
- Dedicated account manager
Which should you pick?
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Choose TunnelBear if
- You need encrypted vpn tunnel.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- You also want server location switching.
Questions people ask
- Is Metasploit or TunnelBear better?
- Neither clearly leads. Metasploit starts at Free and TunnelBear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Metasploit or TunnelBear?
- Metasploit starts at Free and TunnelBear at Free.
- Does Metasploit or TunnelBear run on more platforms?
- Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli. TunnelBear runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- Can I use Metasploit for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Metasploit best used for?
- Metasploit is most often used for penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities, validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable, running phishing and credential attack simulations on the pro edition. Of those, penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities and validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable are not what TunnelBear is typically brought in for.
- What can Metasploit do that TunnelBear cannot?
- Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules. TunnelBear covers Encrypted VPN tunnel, Server location switching, GhostBear obfuscation, Browser extensions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Metasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourceMetasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourceMetasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs Windscribe
- Metasploit vs Mullvad VPN
- Metasploit vs Private Internet Access
- Metasploit vs IVPN
- Metasploit vs Enpass
- Metasploit vs CyberGhost VPN
- Metasploit vs NordVPN
- Metasploit vs Surfshark
- Metasploit vs Avast One
- Metasploit vs ProtonVPN
- Metasploit vs Jamf Pro
- Metasploit vs Keeper Password Manager
- Metasploit vs Keygen
- Metasploit vs KnowBe4
- Metasploit vs Legit Security
- Metasploit vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Metasploit vs ExpressVPN
- TunnelBear vs 1Password
- TunnelBear vs Bitdefender Total Security
- TunnelBear vs Norton 360
- TunnelBear vs LastPass
- TunnelBear vs Burp Suite
- TunnelBear vs OWASP ZAP
- TunnelBear vs Syft
- TunnelBear vs Wireshark
- TunnelBear vs HashiCorp Vault
- TunnelBear vs Bitwarden
- TunnelBear vs Semgrep
- TunnelBear vs Passbolt
- TunnelBear vs RoboForm
- TunnelBear vs Sardine
- TunnelBear vs Semperis
- TunnelBear vs SentinelOne
- TunnelBear vs Shufti Pro
- TunnelBear vs SentinelOne Singularity
- TunnelBear vs Windscribe
- TunnelBear vs Mullvad VPN
- TunnelBear vs Private Internet Access
- TunnelBear vs IVPN
- TunnelBear vs Enpass
- TunnelBear vs CyberGhost VPN
- TunnelBear vs NordVPN
- TunnelBear vs Surfshark
- TunnelBear vs Avast One
- TunnelBear vs ProtonVPN
- TunnelBear vs Jamf Pro
- TunnelBear vs Keeper Password Manager
- TunnelBear vs Keygen
- TunnelBear vs KnowBe4
- TunnelBear vs Legit Security
- TunnelBear vs LogRhythm SIEM
- TunnelBear vs ExpressVPN
