Cybersecurity · head to head
Google Authenticator vs Resolver

Google Authenticator
Cybersecurity
Free TOTP two-factor authentication app that gained optional cloud sync in 2023
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Google Authenticator has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Google Authenticator enabling cloud sync moves the security boundary for your 2FA codes to your Google account, so a compromised Google account can expose the same codes syncing was meant to protect.; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: Google Authenticator covers TOTP code generation, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Google Authenticator and Resolver actually diverge.
| Attribute | Google Authenticator | Resolver |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Free, no in-app purchases | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Google Authenticator
- TOTP code generation
- QR code setup
- Optional Google account sync
- Offline generation
- Manual entry
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Google Authenticator
- Someone setting up two-factor authentication on a website that asks for a TOTP appnot Resolver
- A user who wants codes to survive a lost or replaced phone via account syncnot Resolver
- Someone who prefers a simple, free, single-purpose authenticator over a password manager's built-in onenot Resolver
- A person migrating between phones who wants existing 2FA codes to transfer automaticallynot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Google Authenticator
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Google Authenticator
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Google Authenticator
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Google Authenticator
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Google Authenticator
- Enabling cloud sync moves the security boundary for your 2FA codes to your Google account, so a compromised Google account can expose the same codes syncing was meant to protect.
- It has no built-in backup export in a portable format, so moving away from Google Authenticator to another app usually means resetting 2FA on every individual service.
- It lacks organisational features such as folders, search or notes that some competing authenticator apps offer for people managing many accounts.
- There is no desktop app, so codes must be read off a phone screen when logging in from a computer.
- If sync is off and the phone is lost without a separate backup, all codes are unrecoverable and every linked account needs its 2FA reset through account recovery.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Google Authenticator
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited accounts and codes
- Optional Google account cloud sync
- No ads
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Google Authenticator if
- You need totp code generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android.
- You also want qr code setup.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Google Authenticator or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Google Authenticator starts at Free and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Google Authenticator or Resolver?
- Google Authenticator has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Google Authenticator and On request for Resolver.
- Does Google Authenticator or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Google Authenticator runs on iOS, Android. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Google Authenticator for free?
- Yes. Google Authenticator has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is Google Authenticator best used for?
- Google Authenticator is most often used for someone setting up two-factor authentication on a website that asks for a totp app, a user who wants codes to survive a lost or replaced phone via account sync, someone who prefers a simple, free, single-purpose authenticator over a password manager's built-in one, a person migrating between phones who wants existing 2fa codes to transfer automatically. Of those, someone setting up two-factor authentication on a website that asks for a totp app and a user who wants codes to survive a lost or replaced phone via account sync are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Google Authenticator do that Resolver cannot?
- Google Authenticator covers TOTP code generation, QR code setup, Optional Google account sync, Offline generation. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Google Authenticator: Does Google Authenticator cost anything?
No, it is free with no subscription or in-app purchases.
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Google Authenticator: Is cloud sync safe?
Google documents it as protected by your Google account security. Whether that is an acceptable trade-off versus device-only storage is debated; you can turn sync off if you prefer local-only codes.
Resolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Google Authenticator: Can I export my codes to another app?
There is no official bulk export; moving to a different authenticator typically requires re-adding each account from its setup page.
Resolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
More on Google Authenticator
Other head to heads
- Google Authenticator vs Authelia
- Google Authenticator vs Semgrep
- Google Authenticator vs Arnica
- Google Authenticator vs Endor Labs
- Google Authenticator vs Sticky Password
- Google Authenticator vs 1Password
- Google Authenticator vs LastPass
- Google Authenticator vs HashiCorp Vault
- Google Authenticator vs Bitwarden
- Google Authenticator vs Akeyless
- Google Authenticator vs Doppler
- Google Authenticator vs Frontegg
- Google Authenticator vs Recorded Future
- Google Authenticator vs RoboForm
- Google Authenticator vs Sardine
- Google Authenticator vs Semperis
- Google Authenticator vs SentinelOne
- Google Authenticator vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Google Authenticator vs LogicManager
- Google Authenticator vs Diligent
- Google Authenticator vs MetricStream
- Google Authenticator vs NICE Actimize
- Google Authenticator vs Omada Identity
- Google Authenticator vs Silent Eight
- Google Authenticator vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Google Authenticator vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Google Authenticator vs OneTrust
- Google Authenticator vs Rhombus Systems
- Google Authenticator vs Trulioo
- Google Authenticator vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Google Authenticator vs ExpressVPN
- Google Authenticator vs Falco
- Google Authenticator vs Fenergo
- Google Authenticator vs Grype
- Resolver vs Authelia
- Resolver vs Semgrep
- Resolver vs Arnica
- Resolver vs Endor Labs
- Resolver vs Sticky Password
- Resolver vs 1Password
- Resolver vs LastPass
- Resolver vs HashiCorp Vault
- Resolver vs Bitwarden
- Resolver vs Akeyless
- Resolver vs Doppler
- Resolver vs Frontegg
- Resolver vs Recorded Future
- Resolver vs RoboForm
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Semperis
- Resolver vs SentinelOne
- Resolver vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Grype
