Databases · head to head
RavenDB vs RisingWave

RisingWave
Databases
Streaming database that maintains incremental materialised views in SQL instead of Flink jobs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: RavenDB the free Developer licence bars commercial use and expires every 6 months, requiring renewal; RisingWave anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one.
- They diverge on capability: RavenDB covers ACID Transactions, RisingWave covers SQL materialised views.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which RavenDB and RisingWave actually diverge.
| Attribute | RavenDB | RisingWave |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Per RisingWave Unit hour |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in RavenDB
- ACID Transactions
- Auto-indexing
- Full-text Search
- Graph Queries
- Distributed Counters
- Time Series
- Document Compression
- .NET
Only in RisingWave
- SQL materialised views
- Postgres wire compatibility
- Object storage state
- Source connectors
- Sink connectors
- Iceberg tables
- Watermarks and windowing
- User defined functions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
RavenDB
- Running a distributed document database with ACID transactionsnot RisingWave
- Self hosting a multi node database cluster on your own hardwarenot RisingWave
- Replicating operational data out to analytics systems through ETLnot RisingWave
RisingWave
- A team with Kafka topics that needs continuously fresh aggregates for a dashboard without standing up a Flink clusternot RavenDB
- A fraud or risk team maintaining rolling counters and joins across event streams expressed as SQL viewsnot RavenDB
- A company doing Postgres CDC into a real-time denormalised view for search or servingnot RavenDB
- An analytics group that wants streaming results landed directly into Apache Iceberg without a separate writer jobnot RavenDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
RavenDB
- The free Developer licence bars commercial use and expires every 6 months, requiring renewal
- The free Community licence caps a customer at 60 cores and forces you to stay on the latest major version
- The Professional licence is limited to a single database, a 5 node cluster, 40 cores and 240 GB RAM
- Sharding across nodes, ETL to OLAP, Elasticsearch and Kafka, and data archival are Enterprise only
- Enterprise and AI licence pricing is contact us only with no published rate
RisingWave
- Anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one.
- The Apache 2.0 community edition excludes premium features behind a licence key, and which capabilities sit on which side of that line moves between releases, so a self-hosted plan can be invalidated by an upgrade.
- Long-running materialised views accumulate state in object storage, and cost and recovery time grow with retention in ways that are hard to forecast before you are in production.
- The Postgres compatibility is protocol level; it is not a transactional Postgres and using it as a general purpose database, with point updates or high write concurrency, goes badly.
- It is a comparatively young venture-funded project competing with Flink, Materialize and warehouse-native streaming, and the ecosystem of connectors, operators and third-party expertise is much thinner.
Pricing, plan by plan
RavenDB
Free- CommunityFree
- 3 cores
- 6GB RAM
- Community support
- Professional$499/year
- Production use
- Professional support
- Advanced features
RisingWave
Free- Community EditionFree
- Apache 2.0 licence, self-hosted
- Core streaming engine and connectors
- Premium features excluded and require a licence key
- Cloud Basic$0.227/hour
- Billed per RisingWave Unit hour
- Hosted on AWS, GCP or Azure
- Capped at 64 cores
- Cloud Pro$undefined/year
- No core limit
- Bring your own cloud option
- Premium features included
- Self-managed Enterprise$undefined/year
- On premises or Kubernetes
- Premium features unlocked by licence
- Annual contract with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose RavenDB if
- You need acid transactions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want auto-indexing.
Choose RisingWave if
- You need sql materialised views.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want postgres wire compatibility.
Questions people ask
- Is RavenDB or RisingWave better?
- Neither clearly leads. RavenDB starts at Free and RisingWave at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, RavenDB or RisingWave?
- RavenDB starts at Free and RisingWave at Free.
- Does RavenDB or RisingWave run on more platforms?
- RavenDB runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. RisingWave runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- Can I use RavenDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is RavenDB best used for?
- RavenDB is most often used for running a distributed document database with acid transactions, self hosting a multi node database cluster on your own hardware, replicating operational data out to analytics systems through etl. Of those, running a distributed document database with acid transactions and self hosting a multi node database cluster on your own hardware are not what RisingWave is typically brought in for.
- What can RavenDB do that RisingWave cannot?
- RavenDB covers ACID Transactions, Auto-indexing, Full-text Search, Graph Queries. RisingWave covers SQL materialised views, Postgres wire compatibility, Object storage state, Source connectors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
RavenDB: Is RavenDB free or open source?
RavenDB is open source under the AGPLv3 license and available on GitHub. It also offers a free developer license with enterprise-level features limited to 9 cores, 36GB max RAM, 3 nodes, and non-commercial use.
SourceRisingWave: Is RisingWave open source?
The community edition is Apache 2.0 and self-hostable, but a set of premium features requires a paid licence key.
RavenDB: Can I use RavenDB commercially for free?
RavenDB offers a free Community License that permits commercial deployment with unlimited databases and sizes, subject to a 60-core maximum per customer and requirement to run the latest major version.
SourceRisingWave: What does the cloud cost?
It starts at 0.227 US dollars per RisingWave Unit hour on the Basic tier, which is capped at 64 cores.
RavenDB: What commercial licensing options does RavenDB offer?
RavenDB offers Professional, Enterprise, and AI tiers for commercial use. Pricing for these tiers requires contacting their sales team at [email protected].
SourceRisingWave: Does it replace Flink?
For SQL-expressible transformations, often yes. For custom stateful processing and complex event handling, no.
RavenDB: Does RavenDB offer a cloud hosting option?
RavenDB Cloud provides a fully managed cloud database with maintenance, failover, and backups included. Pricing is available at cloud.ravendb.net/pricing.
SourceRisingWave: Can I query it like Postgres?
Yes over the Postgres wire protocol, but it is an analytical streaming engine, not a transactional database.
RavenDB: Is there a refund window if I purchase RavenDB?
RavenDB offers a 30-day refund window for purchased licenses.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- RavenDB vs Airtable
- RavenDB vs Cockroach Labs
- RavenDB vs PostgreSQL
- RavenDB vs Amazon Aurora
- RavenDB vs CouchDB
- RavenDB vs ArangoDB
- RavenDB vs Couchbase
- RavenDB vs DataGrip
- RavenDB vs Firestore
- RavenDB vs ScyllaDB
- RavenDB vs Dragonfly
- RavenDB vs Dremio
- RavenDB vs Fivetran HVR
- RavenDB vs Grist
- RavenDB vs IBM Db2
- RavenDB vs Instaclustr
- RavenDB vs DynamoDB
- RavenDB vs Cassandra
- RavenDB vs Apache Flink
- RavenDB vs Materialize
- RavenDB vs Tinybird
- RavenDB vs Redpanda
- RavenDB vs Timeplus
- RavenDB vs Estuary
- RavenDB vs TiDB
- RavenDB vs Xata
- RavenDB vs SQLite
- RavenDB vs StarRocks
- RavenDB vs SurrealDB
- RavenDB vs Teradata
- RavenDB vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- RavenDB vs Apache Kafka
- RisingWave vs Airtable
- RisingWave vs Cockroach Labs
- RisingWave vs PostgreSQL
- RisingWave vs Amazon Aurora
- RisingWave vs CouchDB
- RisingWave vs ArangoDB
- RisingWave vs Couchbase
- RisingWave vs DataGrip
- RisingWave vs Firestore
- RisingWave vs ScyllaDB
- RisingWave vs Dragonfly
- RisingWave vs Dremio
- RisingWave vs Fivetran HVR
- RisingWave vs Grist
- RisingWave vs IBM Db2
- RisingWave vs Instaclustr
- RisingWave vs DynamoDB
- RisingWave vs Cassandra
- RisingWave vs Apache Flink
- RisingWave vs Materialize
- RisingWave vs Tinybird
- RisingWave vs Redpanda
- RisingWave vs Timeplus
- RisingWave vs Estuary
- RisingWave vs TiDB
- RisingWave vs Xata
- RisingWave vs SQLite
- RisingWave vs StarRocks
- RisingWave vs SurrealDB
- RisingWave vs Teradata
- RisingWave vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- RisingWave vs Apache Kafka

