Databases · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs RisingWave

Amazon Aurora
Databases
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

RisingWave
Databases
Streaming database that maintains incremental materialised views in SQL instead of Flink jobs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; RisingWave anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one.
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, RisingWave covers SQL materialised views.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and RisingWave actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | RisingWave |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Per RisingWave Unit hour |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud |
| Founded | 2006 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in RisingWave
- SQL materialised views
- Postgres wire compatibility
- Object storage state
- Source connectors
- Sink connectors
- Iceberg tables
- Watermarks and windowing
- User defined functions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot RisingWave
- Data storagenot RisingWave
- Application backendnot RisingWave
- Reportingnot RisingWave
- Data analyticsnot RisingWave
RisingWave
- A team with Kafka topics that needs continuously fresh aggregates for a dashboard without standing up a Flink clusternot Amazon Aurora
- A fraud or risk team maintaining rolling counters and joins across event streams expressed as SQL viewsnot Amazon Aurora
- A company doing Postgres CDC into a real-time denormalised view for search or servingnot Amazon Aurora
- An analytics group that wants streaming results landed directly into Apache Iceberg without a separate writer jobnot Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
RisingWave
- Anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one.
- The Apache 2.0 community edition excludes premium features behind a licence key, and which capabilities sit on which side of that line moves between releases, so a self-hosted plan can be invalidated by an upgrade.
- Long-running materialised views accumulate state in object storage, and cost and recovery time grow with retention in ways that are hard to forecast before you are in production.
- The Postgres compatibility is protocol level; it is not a transactional Postgres and using it as a general purpose database, with point updates or high write concurrency, goes badly.
- It is a comparatively young venture-funded project competing with Flink, Materialize and warehouse-native streaming, and the ecosystem of connectors, operators and third-party expertise is much thinner.
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
RisingWave
Free- Community EditionFree
- Apache 2.0 licence, self-hosted
- Core streaming engine and connectors
- Premium features excluded and require a licence key
- Cloud Basic$0.227/hour
- Billed per RisingWave Unit hour
- Hosted on AWS, GCP or Azure
- Capped at 64 cores
- Cloud Pro$undefined/year
- No core limit
- Bring your own cloud option
- Premium features included
- Self-managed Enterprise$undefined/year
- On premises or Kubernetes
- Premium features unlocked by licence
- Annual contract with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose RisingWave if
- You need sql materialised views.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want postgres wire compatibility.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or RisingWave better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and RisingWave at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or RisingWave?
- Amazon Aurora starts at Free and RisingWave at Free.
- Does Amazon Aurora or RisingWave run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. RisingWave runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what RisingWave is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that RisingWave cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. RisingWave covers SQL materialised views, Postgres wire compatibility, Object storage state, Source connectors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceRisingWave: Is RisingWave open source?
The community edition is Apache 2.0 and self-hostable, but a set of premium features requires a paid licence key.
Amazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceRisingWave: What does the cloud cost?
It starts at 0.227 US dollars per RisingWave Unit hour on the Basic tier, which is capped at 64 cores.
Amazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceRisingWave: Does it replace Flink?
For SQL-expressible transformations, often yes. For custom stateful processing and complex event handling, no.
Amazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceRisingWave: Can I query it like Postgres?
Yes over the Postgres wire protocol, but it is an analytical streaming engine, not a transactional database.
Amazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- Amazon Aurora vs FaunaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs DataStax
- Amazon Aurora vs ScyllaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Aiven
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs QuestDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Vitess
- Amazon Aurora vs BigQuery
- Amazon Aurora vs CosmosDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Flink
- Amazon Aurora vs Materialize
- Amazon Aurora vs Tinybird
- Amazon Aurora vs Redpanda
- Amazon Aurora vs Timeplus
- Amazon Aurora vs Estuary
- Amazon Aurora vs Instaclustr
- Amazon Aurora vs Fivetran HVR
- Amazon Aurora vs TiDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Xata
- Amazon Aurora vs SQLite
- Amazon Aurora vs StarRocks
- Amazon Aurora vs SurrealDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Teradata
- Amazon Aurora vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Kafka
- RisingWave vs PlanetScale
- RisingWave vs Firebolt
- RisingWave vs FaunaDB
- RisingWave vs Cockroach Labs
- RisingWave vs Azure SQL
- RisingWave vs DataStax
- RisingWave vs ScyllaDB
- RisingWave vs MariaDB
- RisingWave vs Aiven
- RisingWave vs Apache Druid
- RisingWave vs Couchbase
- RisingWave vs QuestDB
- RisingWave vs Vitess
- RisingWave vs BigQuery
- RisingWave vs CosmosDB
- RisingWave vs Microsoft SQL Server
- RisingWave vs Apache Flink
- RisingWave vs Materialize
- RisingWave vs Tinybird
- RisingWave vs Redpanda
- RisingWave vs Timeplus
- RisingWave vs Estuary
- RisingWave vs Instaclustr
- RisingWave vs Fivetran HVR
- RisingWave vs TiDB
- RisingWave vs Xata
- RisingWave vs SQLite
- RisingWave vs StarRocks
- RisingWave vs SurrealDB
- RisingWave vs Teradata
- RisingWave vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- RisingWave vs Apache Kafka
