Software · head to head
DynamoDB vs RavenDB

DynamoDB
Software
Fast, flexible NoSQL database service for any scale
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only RavenDB has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DynamoDB noSQL-only; does not support complex relational queries or SQL joins; RavenDB the free Developer licence bars commercial use and expires every 6 months, requiring renewal
- They diverge on capability: DynamoDB covers Single-digit Millisecond Latency, RavenDB covers ACID Transactions.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DynamoDB and RavenDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DynamoDB
- Single-digit Millisecond Latency
- Serverless
- Auto-scaling
- Global Tables
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Encryption
- Streams
- Lambda
Only in RavenDB
- ACID Transactions
- Auto-indexing
- Full-text Search
- Graph Queries
- Distributed Counters
- Time Series
- Document Compression
- .NET
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DynamoDB
- High-scale, variable-workload applicationsnot RavenDB
- Mobile and IoT device backendsnot RavenDB
- Real-time analytics and dashboardsnot RavenDB
- Multi-region, globally distributed applicationsnot RavenDB
RavenDB
- Running a distributed document database with ACID transactionsnot DynamoDB
- Self hosting a multi node database cluster on your own hardwarenot DynamoDB
- Replicating operational data out to analytics systems through ETLnot DynamoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DynamoDB
- NoSQL-only; does not support complex relational queries or SQL joins
- Limited query flexibility; requires thinking in terms of keys and indexes rather than ad-hoc queries
RavenDB
- The free Developer licence bars commercial use and expires every 6 months, requiring renewal
- The free Community licence caps a customer at 60 cores and forces you to stay on the latest major version
- The Professional licence is limited to a single database, a 5 node cluster, 40 cores and 240 GB RAM
- Sharding across nodes, ETL to OLAP, Elasticsearch and Kafka, and data archival are Enterprise only
- Enterprise and AI licence pricing is contact us only with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
DynamoDB
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the DynamoDB review.
RavenDB
Free- CommunityFree
- 3 cores
- 6GB RAM
- Community support
- Professional$499/year
- Production use
- Professional support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose DynamoDB if
- You need single-digit millisecond latency.
- You work on AWS.
- You also want serverless.
Choose RavenDB if
- You need acid transactions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want auto-indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is DynamoDB or RavenDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. DynamoDB starts at On request and RavenDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DynamoDB or RavenDB?
- RavenDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for DynamoDB and Free for RavenDB.
- Does DynamoDB or RavenDB run on more platforms?
- DynamoDB runs on AWS. RavenDB runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use RavenDB for free?
- Yes. RavenDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. DynamoDB starts at On request.
- What is DynamoDB best used for?
- DynamoDB is most often used for high-scale, variable-workload applications, mobile and iot device backends, real-time analytics and dashboards, multi-region, globally distributed applications. Of those, high-scale, variable-workload applications and mobile and iot device backends are not what RavenDB is typically brought in for.
- What can DynamoDB do that RavenDB cannot?
- DynamoDB covers Single-digit Millisecond Latency, Serverless, Auto-scaling, Global Tables. RavenDB covers ACID Transactions, Auto-indexing, Full-text Search, Graph Queries. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- DynamoDB vs Cockroach Labs
- DynamoDB vs PostgreSQL
- DynamoDB vs Airtable
- DynamoDB vs Amazon Aurora
- DynamoDB vs Elasticsearch
- DynamoDB vs PlanetScale
- DynamoDB vs Azure SQL
- DynamoDB vs ClickHouse
- DynamoDB vs Couchbase
- DynamoDB vs DuckDB
- DynamoDB vs MariaDB
- DynamoDB vs Oracle Database
- DynamoDB vs Amazon RDS
- DynamoDB vs Amazon Redshift
- DynamoDB vs Apache Druid
- DynamoDB vs Cassandra
- DynamoDB vs CouchDB
- DynamoDB vs Firebolt
- RavenDB vs Cockroach Labs
- RavenDB vs PostgreSQL
- RavenDB vs Airtable
- RavenDB vs Amazon Aurora
- RavenDB vs Elasticsearch
- RavenDB vs PlanetScale
- RavenDB vs Azure SQL
- RavenDB vs ClickHouse
- RavenDB vs Couchbase
- RavenDB vs DuckDB
- RavenDB vs MariaDB
- RavenDB vs Oracle Database
- RavenDB vs Amazon RDS
- RavenDB vs Amazon Redshift
- RavenDB vs Apache Druid
- RavenDB vs Cassandra
- RavenDB vs CouchDB
- RavenDB vs Firebolt

