Databases · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs RisingWave

RisingWave
Databases
Streaming database that maintains incremental materialised views in SQL instead of Flink jobs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); RisingWave anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one.
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, RisingWave covers SQL materialised views.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and RisingWave actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | RisingWave |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Per RisingWave Unit hour |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in RisingWave
- SQL materialised views
- Postgres wire compatibility
- Object storage state
- Source connectors
- Sink connectors
- Iceberg tables
- Watermarks and windowing
- User defined functions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot RisingWave
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot RisingWave
RisingWave
- A team with Kafka topics that needs continuously fresh aggregates for a dashboard without standing up a Flink clusternot Cockroach Labs
- A fraud or risk team maintaining rolling counters and joins across event streams expressed as SQL viewsnot Cockroach Labs
- A company doing Postgres CDC into a real-time denormalised view for search or servingnot Cockroach Labs
- An analytics group that wants streaming results landed directly into Apache Iceberg without a separate writer jobnot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
RisingWave
- Anything that does not fit SQL, such as custom windowing, complex event processing or heavy stateful logic, still needs Flink, so RisingWave often adds a system rather than removing one.
- The Apache 2.0 community edition excludes premium features behind a licence key, and which capabilities sit on which side of that line moves between releases, so a self-hosted plan can be invalidated by an upgrade.
- Long-running materialised views accumulate state in object storage, and cost and recovery time grow with retention in ways that are hard to forecast before you are in production.
- The Postgres compatibility is protocol level; it is not a transactional Postgres and using it as a general purpose database, with point updates or high write concurrency, goes badly.
- It is a comparatively young venture-funded project competing with Flink, Materialize and warehouse-native streaming, and the ecosystem of connectors, operators and third-party expertise is much thinner.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
RisingWave
Free- Community EditionFree
- Apache 2.0 licence, self-hosted
- Core streaming engine and connectors
- Premium features excluded and require a licence key
- Cloud Basic$0.227/hour
- Billed per RisingWave Unit hour
- Hosted on AWS, GCP or Azure
- Capped at 64 cores
- Cloud Pro$undefined/year
- No core limit
- Bring your own cloud option
- Premium features included
- Self-managed Enterprise$undefined/year
- On premises or Kubernetes
- Premium features unlocked by licence
- Annual contract with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose RisingWave if
- You need sql materialised views.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want postgres wire compatibility.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or RisingWave better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and RisingWave at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or RisingWave?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and RisingWave at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or RisingWave run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. RisingWave runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what RisingWave is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that RisingWave cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. RisingWave covers SQL materialised views, Postgres wire compatibility, Object storage state, Source connectors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cockroach Labs: What does the free Basic tier include?
The Basic tier is free and includes 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month, with a maximum compute of 30K RU/sec. No credit card is required to start.
SourceRisingWave: Is RisingWave open source?
The community edition is Apache 2.0 and self-hostable, but a set of premium features requires a paid licence key.
Cockroach Labs: How much do the paid tiers cost?
Standard tier starts at $0.18 per hour for 2 vCPUs, and Advanced tier starts at $0.60 per hour for 4 vCPUs. Both tiers support additional resources with higher costs for increased compute and storage.
SourceRisingWave: What does the cloud cost?
It starts at 0.227 US dollars per RisingWave Unit hour on the Basic tier, which is capped at 64 cores.
Cockroach Labs: What are the storage limits for each tier?
Basic plan supports up to 3 TiB storage, Standard tier up to 3 TiB, and Advanced tier up to 10 TiB per node with unlimited total storage.
SourceRisingWave: Does it replace Flink?
For SQL-expressible transformations, often yes. For custom stateful processing and complex event handling, no.
Cockroach Labs: Can I get trial credits before paying?
Yes, new users can try CockroachDB free with $400 in credits. The Basic and Standard plans do not require a credit card to start.
SourceRisingWave: Can I query it like Postgres?
Yes over the Postgres wire protocol, but it is an analytical streaming engine, not a transactional database.
Cockroach Labs: Do legacy contracts have different pricing?
Customers with annual or multi-year contracts entered before December 1, 2024 can view legacy pricing terms on a separate page, which apply until their contract renewal date.
SourceRelated pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs YugabyteDB
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs Google Cloud SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs TiDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Dgraph
- Cockroach Labs vs CosmosDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DataStax
- Cockroach Labs vs Neo4j
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Materialize
- Cockroach Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Turso
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Flink
- Cockroach Labs vs Tinybird
- Cockroach Labs vs Redpanda
- Cockroach Labs vs Timeplus
- Cockroach Labs vs Estuary
- Cockroach Labs vs Instaclustr
- Cockroach Labs vs Fivetran HVR
- Cockroach Labs vs Xata
- Cockroach Labs vs SQLite
- Cockroach Labs vs StarRocks
- Cockroach Labs vs SurrealDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Teradata
- Cockroach Labs vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Kafka
- RisingWave vs YugabyteDB
- RisingWave vs PostgreSQL
- RisingWave vs Couchbase
- RisingWave vs Google Cloud SQL
- RisingWave vs Amazon Aurora
- RisingWave vs Elasticsearch
- RisingWave vs Oracle Database
- RisingWave vs TiDB
- RisingWave vs Dgraph
- RisingWave vs CosmosDB
- RisingWave vs DataStax
- RisingWave vs Neo4j
- RisingWave vs MariaDB
- RisingWave vs Materialize
- RisingWave vs TimescaleDB
- RisingWave vs Turso
- RisingWave vs Amazon RDS
- RisingWave vs Apache Flink
- RisingWave vs Tinybird
- RisingWave vs Redpanda
- RisingWave vs Timeplus
- RisingWave vs Estuary
- RisingWave vs Instaclustr
- RisingWave vs Fivetran HVR
- RisingWave vs Xata
- RisingWave vs SQLite
- RisingWave vs StarRocks
- RisingWave vs SurrealDB
- RisingWave vs Teradata
- RisingWave vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- RisingWave vs Apache Kafka

