Software · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs RavenDB

Amazon Aurora
Software
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; RavenDB the free Developer licence bars commercial use and expires every 6 months, requiring renewal
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, RavenDB covers ACID Transactions.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and RavenDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | RavenDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web |
| Founded | 2006 | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in RavenDB
- ACID Transactions
- Auto-indexing
- Full-text Search
- Graph Queries
- Distributed Counters
- Time Series
- Document Compression
- .NET
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot RavenDB
- Data storagenot RavenDB
- Application backendnot RavenDB
- Reportingnot RavenDB
- Data analyticsnot RavenDB
RavenDB
- Running a distributed document database with ACID transactionsnot Amazon Aurora
- Self hosting a multi node database cluster on your own hardwarenot Amazon Aurora
- Replicating operational data out to analytics systems through ETLnot Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
RavenDB
- The free Developer licence bars commercial use and expires every 6 months, requiring renewal
- The free Community licence caps a customer at 60 cores and forces you to stay on the latest major version
- The Professional licence is limited to a single database, a 5 node cluster, 40 cores and 240 GB RAM
- Sharding across nodes, ETL to OLAP, Elasticsearch and Kafka, and data archival are Enterprise only
- Enterprise and AI licence pricing is contact us only with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
RavenDB
Free- CommunityFree
- 3 cores
- 6GB RAM
- Community support
- Professional$499/year
- Production use
- Professional support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose RavenDB if
- You need acid transactions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want auto-indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or RavenDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and RavenDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or RavenDB?
- Amazon Aurora starts at Free and RavenDB at Free.
- Does Amazon Aurora or RavenDB run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. RavenDB runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what RavenDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that RavenDB cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. RavenDB covers ACID Transactions, Auto-indexing, Full-text Search, Graph Queries. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceAmazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceAmazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Aurora vs Airtable
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs DuckDB
- Amazon Aurora vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon Redshift
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Aurora vs Cassandra
- Amazon Aurora vs CouchDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- RavenDB vs Cockroach Labs
- RavenDB vs PostgreSQL
- RavenDB vs Airtable
- RavenDB vs Elasticsearch
- RavenDB vs PlanetScale
- RavenDB vs Azure SQL
- RavenDB vs ClickHouse
- RavenDB vs Couchbase
- RavenDB vs DuckDB
- RavenDB vs DynamoDB
- RavenDB vs MariaDB
- RavenDB vs Oracle Database
- RavenDB vs Amazon RDS
- RavenDB vs Amazon Redshift
- RavenDB vs Apache Druid
- RavenDB vs Cassandra
- RavenDB vs CouchDB
- RavenDB vs Firebolt

