Softwr

Surveys · head to head

Qualtrics CoreXM vs Roxhill

Qualtrics CoreXM logo

Qualtrics CoreXM

Surveys

Enterprise survey and market research platform, priced by seat and response volume through negotiated contracts

From
On request
Free plan
No
Full reviewWebsite
Roxhill logo

Roxhill

Marketing

UK-focused journalist database and media monitoring, founder-owned and annual only

From
On request
Free plan
No
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Qualtrics CoreXM there is no public pricing for any deployment beyond a small individual self-service plan, so budgeting requires a sales conversation before a shortlist can even be built.; Roxhill the database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
  • They diverge on capability: Qualtrics CoreXM covers Advanced survey logic, Roxhill covers Journalist database.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Qualtrics CoreXM and Roxhill actually diverge.

Attributes where Qualtrics CoreXM and Roxhill differ
AttributeQualtrics CoreXMRoxhill
CategorySurveysMarketing

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Qualtrics CoreXM

  • Advanced survey logic
  • Statistical analysis tools
  • Text analytics
  • Dashboards and reporting
  • Panel integration
  • API and platform integrations

Only in Roxhill

  • Journalist database
  • Journalist profiles
  • Media lists and distribution
  • Media requests and alerts
  • Media monitoring
  • Bespoke newsletters
  • Historical search
  • Journalist Assistant

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Qualtrics CoreXM

  • A market research team running quantitative studies that need built-in statistical significance testingnot Roxhill
  • A product team wanting text analytics on open-ended customer feedback at scalenot Roxhill
  • An enterprise consolidating multiple survey tools into one platform with a single data warehouse integrationnot Roxhill
  • A researcher who needs access to third-party respondent panels alongside the survey buildernot Roxhill

Roxhill

  • A UK in-house press office that needs journalist contacts with current pitching preferences rather than a scraped byline list.not Qualtrics CoreXM
  • An agency tracking forward features across UK trade and consumer titles to place clients into planned coverage months ahead.not Qualtrics CoreXM
  • A communications team monitoring named spokespeople and measuring their share of voice against competitors in UK media.not Qualtrics CoreXM
  • A UK public sector body procuring through G-Cloud that needs EEA-hosted media monitoring with a published framework price band.not Qualtrics CoreXM

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Qualtrics CoreXM

  • There is no public pricing for any deployment beyond a small individual self-service plan, so budgeting requires a sales conversation before a shortlist can even be built.
  • Typical small enterprise contracts run 25,000 to 50,000 US dollars a year, which puts it far outside the budget of small businesses that Typeform, Jotform or SurveyMonkey serve well.
  • The interface and logic builder have a steep learning curve compared with lighter tools, so new users need training before building complex surveys confidently.
  • It is easy to confuse with Qualtrics EmployeeXM in the same product family; buyers evaluating employee engagement specifically should look at EmployeeXM, not CoreXM.
  • Multi-year contracts with per-module add-ons mean the effective cost tends to grow year over year as teams add capabilities piecemeal.

Roxhill

  • The database is UK-centric by reviewers’ own account, with weak US, Australian and broader Asian journalist coverage, so any multi-market programme needs a second vendor and the single-vendor cost case disappears.
  • Contact records go stale: reviewers report old email addresses and phone numbers, distribution bounces, and there is no self-serve verification step before you send.
  • At roughly 200,000 to 300,000 journalists it is far smaller than the million-plus figures Cision and Prowly claim, with repeated complaints about thin trade, academic and journal coverage.
  • Selling is annual only with no monthly plan and a trial functionally restricted to around two weeks, so you cannot genuinely pilot before a twelve-month commitment, which is a poor fit for project or retainer agency work.
  • Licence bands are 1, 3 and 5 seats, and extra logins, workspaces, smart folders, historical search, share of voice and the spokespeople platform are all chargeable add-ons, so a team of eight to fifteen pays well above any headline band.
  • Search behaviour is described as counter-intuitive and sometimes returns implausibly few results, which means a null result cannot be trusted and lists need manual cross-checking.
  • Monitoring accuracy takes time to settle after switching, so coverage is missed in the first weeks after a cutover, which is a real gap risk if you time the migration badly.

Pricing, plan by plan

Qualtrics CoreXM

On request
  • CoreXM$undefined/year
    • Self-service entry plan around 35 USD a month for small individual use
    • Typical small enterprise contracts between 25,000 and 50,000 USD a year
    • Priced by seats, response volume and modules selected

Roxhill

On request
  • Core$undefined/year
    • 1 licence
    • Standard database access
    • Journalist Assistant
  • Boutique$undefined/year
    • 3 licences
    • Adds press release distribution
    • 3 workspaces, 6 smart folders, 10 spokespeople, 3 newsletters
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • 5 licences
    • 5 workspaces, 10 smart folders, 5 newsletters
    • Spokespeople platform
  • Premium$undefined/year
    • Everything in Enterprise
    • Insights analysis and bespoke reporting
    • Competitor share of voice

Which should you pick?

Choose Qualtrics CoreXM if

  • You need advanced survey logic.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want statistical analysis tools.
Qualtrics CoreXM review

Choose Roxhill if

  • You need journalist database.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want journalist profiles.
Roxhill review

Questions people ask

Is Qualtrics CoreXM or Roxhill better?
Neither clearly leads. Qualtrics CoreXM starts at On request and Roxhill at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Qualtrics CoreXM or Roxhill?
Qualtrics CoreXM starts at On request and Roxhill at On request.
Does Qualtrics CoreXM or Roxhill run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Qualtrics CoreXM best used for?
Qualtrics CoreXM is most often used for a market research team running quantitative studies that need built-in statistical significance testing, a product team wanting text analytics on open-ended customer feedback at scale, an enterprise consolidating multiple survey tools into one platform with a single data warehouse integration, a researcher who needs access to third-party respondent panels alongside the survey builder. Of those, a market research team running quantitative studies that need built-in statistical significance testing and a product team wanting text analytics on open-ended customer feedback at scale are not what Roxhill is typically brought in for.
What can Qualtrics CoreXM do that Roxhill cannot?
Qualtrics CoreXM covers Advanced survey logic, Statistical analysis tools, Text analytics, Dashboards and reporting. Roxhill covers Journalist database, Journalist profiles, Media lists and distribution, Media requests and alerts.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Qualtrics CoreXM: How is CoreXM different from Qualtrics EmployeeXM?

CoreXM is the general-purpose survey and market research engine; EmployeeXM is a separate, HR-focused product built specifically for employee engagement programmes.

Roxhill: How much does Roxhill cost?

Not published on the vendor site, but the UK G-Cloud 14 listing discloses £6,450 to £25,000 per instance per year. Use that as your anchor.

Qualtrics CoreXM: Is there a published price list?

No, only a small self-service plan around 35 USD a month is public; organisational deployments are negotiated and typically run into five or six figures annually.

Roxhill: Is Roxhill owned by Cision or Access Intelligence?

No. Companies House shows a single individual holding over 75% of shares and no corporate PSC. It is founder-controlled and unfunded. Note the founder previously sold Gorkana to Cision, so ask for a change-of-control clause.

Qualtrics CoreXM: Does CoreXM include text analytics?

Yes, automated theme and sentiment extraction on open-ended responses is included as a core capability.

Roxhill: Is it usable for US or APAC media relations?

Not well. Reviewers describe US, Australian and Asian coverage as materially weaker than UK. Budget for a second database.

Roxhill: Can I buy monthly?

No. Contracts are annual, sales-gated, with a trial of around two weeks.

Share

Related pages

More on Qualtrics CoreXM

More on Roxhill

Keep looking

Other head to heads