Software · head to head
QAD vs TeamSystem

TeamSystem
Software
Italian modular management software for companies and professionals
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: QAD no price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link; TeamSystem no pricing is published anywhere on the site; the homepage directs buyers only to consult with TeamSystem's own sales consultants to identify a customized solution
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which QAD and TeamSystem actually diverge.
| Attribute | QAD | TeamSystem |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2000/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Cloud, On-premise, Web | Web |
| Founded | 1979 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in QAD
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Inventory management
- Quality management
- REST APIs
- EDI
- IoT integration
Only in TeamSystem
Nothing recorded that QAD does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
QAD
- ERP for manufacturers covering production execution and schedulingnot TeamSystem
- Supply chain planning, purchasing and inventory controlnot TeamSystem
- Quality management, traceability and supplier management for regulated manufacturingnot TeamSystem
- Field service and enterprise asset managementnot TeamSystem
TeamSystem
No use cases recorded yet. See the TeamSystem review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
QAD
- No price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- Field service management, enterprise asset management and quality management are presented as separate functional areas rather than a single priced bundle
TeamSystem
- No pricing is published anywhere on the site; the homepage directs buyers only to consult with TeamSystem's own sales consultants to identify a customized solution
- The product is split across many separately branded modules (ERP, accounting, HR, CRM, e-commerce, legal, construction, hospitality), so there is no single price to evaluate
Pricing, plan by plan
QAD
$2000/month- Standard$2000/month
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Premium$4000/month
- Advanced modules
- Analytics
- Priority support
TeamSystem
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the TeamSystem review.
Which should you pick?
Choose QAD if
- You need financial management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- You also want manufacturing.
Choose TeamSystem if
Nothing in the data separates TeamSystem from QAD on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is QAD or TeamSystem better?
- Neither clearly leads. QAD starts at $2000/month and TeamSystem at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, QAD or TeamSystem?
- QAD starts at $2000/month and TeamSystem at On request.
- Does QAD or TeamSystem run on more platforms?
- QAD runs on Cloud, On-premise, Web. TeamSystem runs on Web.
- What is QAD best used for?
- QAD is most often used for erp for manufacturers covering production execution and scheduling, supply chain planning, purchasing and inventory control, quality management, traceability and supplier management for regulated manufacturing, field service and enterprise asset management. Of those, erp for manufacturers covering production execution and scheduling and supply chain planning, purchasing and inventory control are not what TeamSystem is typically brought in for.
- What can QAD do that TeamSystem cannot?
- QAD covers Financial management, Manufacturing, Supply chain, Inventory management.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- QAD vs DEAR Systems
- QAD vs Fishbowl
- QAD vs Infor CloudSuite
- QAD vs MRPeasy
- QAD vs Oracle ERP Cloud
- QAD vs Oracle NetSuite
- QAD vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- QAD vs Sage X3
- QAD vs SYSPRO
- QAD vs Aptean
- QAD vs Axonaut
- QAD vs BatchMaster
- QAD vs bexio
- QAD vs Bling
- QAD vs Blue Link ERP
- QAD vs Cegid
- QAD vs Cin7 Core
- QAD vs Cin7
- TeamSystem vs DEAR Systems
- TeamSystem vs Fishbowl
- TeamSystem vs Infor CloudSuite
- TeamSystem vs MRPeasy
- TeamSystem vs Oracle ERP Cloud
- TeamSystem vs Oracle NetSuite
- TeamSystem vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- TeamSystem vs Sage X3
- TeamSystem vs SYSPRO
- TeamSystem vs Aptean
- TeamSystem vs Axonaut
- TeamSystem vs BatchMaster
- TeamSystem vs bexio
- TeamSystem vs Bling
- TeamSystem vs Blue Link ERP
- TeamSystem vs Cegid
- TeamSystem vs Cin7 Core
- TeamSystem vs Cin7

