ERP · head to head
Apache OFBiz vs QAD

Apache OFBiz
ERP
Java ERP and e-commerce framework from the Apache Foundation, sold as a toolkit not a product
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Apache OFBiz has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Apache OFBiz oFBiz has disclosed repeated critical vulnerabilities including pre-authentication remote code execution and authentication bypass chains, several exploited in the wild, so an internet-facing instance that is not patched promptly is a genuine breach risk rather than a theoretical one.; QAD no price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- They diverge on capability: Apache OFBiz covers Entity engine, QAD covers Financial management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache OFBiz and QAD actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache OFBiz | QAD |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2000/month |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted | Cloud, On-premise, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 1979 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache OFBiz
- Entity engine
- Service engine
- Accounting
- Order management
- E-commerce storefront
- Warehouse management
- Manufacturing and MRP
- Party model
Only in QAD
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Inventory management
- Quality management
- REST APIs
- EDI
- IoT integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache OFBiz
- A systems integrator building a vertical industry product on a permissively licensed ERP core it can redistribute commerciallynot QAD
- An organisation with strong Java capability that needs an order and inventory data model it can extend rather than configurenot QAD
- A business that requires a permissive Apache 2.0 licence because GPL copyleft is unacceptable to its legal teamnot QAD
- A team replacing a bespoke in-house order management system that wants an entity model rather than a finished applicationnot QAD
QAD
- ERP for manufacturers covering production execution and schedulingnot Apache OFBiz
- Supply chain planning, purchasing and inventory controlnot Apache OFBiz
- Quality management, traceability and supplier management for regulated manufacturingnot Apache OFBiz
- Field service and enterprise asset managementnot Apache OFBiz
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache OFBiz
- OFBiz has disclosed repeated critical vulnerabilities including pre-authentication remote code execution and authentication bypass chains, several exploited in the wild, so an internet-facing instance that is not patched promptly is a genuine breach risk rather than a theoretical one.
- There is no vendor, no support contract and no hosted edition, so every deployment depends on either in-house Java skill or an integrator you find and vet yourself.
- The screens and default workflows look and behave like enterprise software from the 2000s, and user acceptance in a finance or warehouse team is frequently the reason projects stall.
- It is a framework rather than a configurable product, so meaningful deployments require Java, XML widget and entity engine development, which puts the real cost in developer months rather than licence fees.
- Localisation for tax, statutory reporting and payroll is largely absent, so any country-specific compliance requirement has to be built, and that build has to be maintained against upstream releases.
QAD
- No price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- Field service management, enterprise asset management and quality management are presented as separate functional areas rather than a single priced bundle
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache OFBiz
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Apache License 2.0, permissive and commercially redistributable
- Accounting, order management, warehousing and manufacturing included
- E-commerce storefront included
QAD
$2000/month- Standard$2000/month
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Premium$4000/month
- Advanced modules
- Analytics
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache OFBiz if
- You need entity engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted.
- You also want service engine.
Choose QAD if
- You need financial management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- You also want manufacturing.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache OFBiz or QAD better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache OFBiz starts at Free and QAD at $2000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache OFBiz or QAD?
- Apache OFBiz has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Apache OFBiz and $2000/month for QAD.
- Does Apache OFBiz or QAD run on more platforms?
- Apache OFBiz runs on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted. QAD runs on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- Can I use Apache OFBiz for free?
- Yes. Apache OFBiz has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. QAD starts at $2000/month.
- What is Apache OFBiz best used for?
- Apache OFBiz is most often used for a systems integrator building a vertical industry product on a permissively licensed erp core it can redistribute commercially, an organisation with strong java capability that needs an order and inventory data model it can extend rather than configure, a business that requires a permissive apache 2.0 licence because gpl copyleft is unacceptable to its legal team, a team replacing a bespoke in-house order management system that wants an entity model rather than a finished application. Of those, a systems integrator building a vertical industry product on a permissively licensed erp core it can redistribute commercially and an organisation with strong java capability that needs an order and inventory data model it can extend rather than configure are not what QAD is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache OFBiz do that QAD cannot?
- Apache OFBiz covers Entity engine, Service engine, Accounting, Order management. QAD covers Financial management, Manufacturing, Supply chain, Inventory management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache OFBiz: Is Apache OFBiz safe to run on the public internet?
Only with disciplined patching. It has shipped fixes for pre-authentication remote code execution and authentication bypass flaws, with CVEs continuing into 2026, and some have been exploited in the wild.
QAD: How can I get pricing information for QAD manufacturing software?
QAD does not publish standard pricing on their homepage. Pricing discussions occur during personalized consultations. Interested parties can request a demo, contact the sales team, or download brochures to discuss pricing based on specific organizational needs.
SourceApache OFBiz: What does it cost?
Nothing to licence. It is Apache 2.0. The cost is Java development, hosting and ongoing security maintenance.
QAD: What deployment options does QAD offer?
QAD provides adaptive ERP solutions for various industries including Automotive, Food & Beverage, and Life Sciences. Their offerings include connected workforce solutions and supply chain management, with implementation and advisory services available.
SourceApache OFBiz: Can I use it as a finished ERP?
Not realistically. It is a framework with reference applications, and most production deployments are custom builds on top of it.
QAD: Is there a trial available for QAD software without contacting sales?
The QAD homepage does not mention a free trial or self-serve trial option. The primary engagement path is through "Request a Demo" or "Contact Sales" buttons, suggesting trial access requires sales team interaction.
SourceApache OFBiz: Why choose it over a GPL ERP?
The Apache 2.0 licence is permissive, so an integrator can build and sell a derived commercial product without copyleft obligations.
Related pages
More on Apache OFBiz
Other head to heads
- Apache OFBiz vs Odoo
- Apache OFBiz vs OpenBravo
- Apache OFBiz vs iDempiere
- Apache OFBiz vs Tryton
- Apache OFBiz vs ADempiere
- Apache OFBiz vs Axelor
- Apache OFBiz vs DEAR Systems
- Apache OFBiz vs IQMS
- Apache OFBiz vs Sage X3
- Apache OFBiz vs BatchMaster
- Apache OFBiz vs Java
- Apache OFBiz vs Katana MRP
- Apache OFBiz vs Axonaut
- Apache OFBiz vs bexio
- Apache OFBiz vs Bling
- Apache OFBiz vs Blue Link ERP
- Apache OFBiz vs Fishbowl
- Apache OFBiz vs Infor CloudSuite
- Apache OFBiz vs MRPeasy
- Apache OFBiz vs Aptean
- Apache OFBiz vs Global Shop Solutions
- Apache OFBiz vs Metasfresh
- Apache OFBiz vs SYSPRO
- Apache OFBiz vs Rootstock
- Apache OFBiz vs IFS Cloud
- Apache OFBiz vs Unit4
- Apache OFBiz vs Visibility
- Apache OFBiz vs Yonyou
- Apache OFBiz vs Ivalua
- Apache OFBiz vs Zip
- Apache OFBiz vs GEP SMART
- QAD vs Odoo
- QAD vs OpenBravo
- QAD vs iDempiere
- QAD vs Tryton
- QAD vs ADempiere
- QAD vs Axelor
- QAD vs DEAR Systems
- QAD vs IQMS
- QAD vs Sage X3
- QAD vs BatchMaster
- QAD vs Java
- QAD vs Katana MRP
- QAD vs Axonaut
- QAD vs bexio
- QAD vs Bling
- QAD vs Blue Link ERP
- QAD vs Fishbowl
- QAD vs Infor CloudSuite
- QAD vs MRPeasy
- QAD vs Aptean
- QAD vs Global Shop Solutions
- QAD vs Metasfresh
- QAD vs SYSPRO
- QAD vs Rootstock
- QAD vs IFS Cloud
- QAD vs Unit4
- QAD vs Visibility
- QAD vs Yonyou
- QAD vs Ivalua
- QAD vs Zip
- QAD vs GEP SMART

