Backup · head to head
Proxmox Backup Server vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes

Proxmox Backup Server
Backup
Deduplicating backup server for virtual machines, containers and Linux hosts, with verification built in
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Backup
Kubernetes-native backup, disaster recovery and application mobility
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Proxmox Backup Server there is no Windows client, so physical Windows machines must be backed up by something else and the estate ends up with two backup products.; Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes licensing is per worker node, so clusters designed with many small nodes for scheduling flexibility pay considerably more than the same capacity in fewer large nodes.
- They diverge on capability: Proxmox Backup Server covers Deduplicated chunk store, Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes covers Application-aware capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Proxmox Backup Server and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes actually diverge.
| Attribute | Proxmox Backup Server | Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Per worker node |
| Platforms | Linux | Kubernetes, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Proxmox Backup Server
- Deduplicated chunk store
- Incremental guest backups
- Client side encryption
- Verification jobs
- Remote sync
- Live restore and file level restore
Only in Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Application-aware capture
- Policy engine
- Immutable targets
- Restore transformation
- Database hooks
- Ransomware detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Proxmox Backup Server
- Backing up a Proxmox VE cluster with incremental block level backups of running guestsnot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Replacing a backup product whose licence is priced per socket or per terabyte on a virtualisation estatenot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Proving backup integrity on a schedule rather than discovering corruption during a restorenot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Keeping an encrypted second copy on a remote server or on tape without a third party servicenot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- A platform team that must prove to auditors it can restore a production namespace, not just its disksnot Proxmox Backup Server
- Migrating a stateful application from on-premises OpenShift to a managed cloud Kubernetes servicenot Proxmox Backup Server
- Protecting Kubernetes workloads to an immutable object store so ransomware cannot delete the backupsnot Proxmox Backup Server
- A team using operators and custom resources that volume-snapshot tools silently fail to capturenot Proxmox Backup Server
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Proxmox Backup Server
- There is no Windows client, so physical Windows machines must be backed up by something else and the estate ends up with two backup products.
- The datastore is millions of small chunk files, so it needs storage with real input and output capability and performs poorly on a single spinning disk or an SMB or NFS share.
- Deduplication is per datastore, so splitting workloads across datastores for retention or tenancy reasons multiplies the storage those workloads consume.
- Garbage collection depends on file access time semantics on the underlying filesystem, so a datastore mounted with the wrong options can fail to reclaim space or, worse, behave unpredictably.
- Subscriptions are priced per CPU socket per year, so a backup server consolidated onto fewer larger dual socket machines pays twice per host for the supported repository.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Licensing is per worker node, so clusters designed with many small nodes for scheduling flexibility pay considerably more than the same capacity in fewer large nodes.
- The free Starter edition is scale limited and community supported, so it works for evaluation and small clusters but there is no gentle upgrade path when production grows past the limit.
- Backup performance depends on the underlying CSI driver snapshot capability, so on storage without proper CSI snapshot support it falls back to slower generic copying.
- Restores into a different cluster need matching custom resource definitions and operator versions present beforehand, so cross-cluster mobility is less automatic than the marketing suggests.
- Kasten protects Kubernetes only, so organisations with mixed virtual machine and container estates run it alongside a separate backup product and manage two retention policies and two sets of evidence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Proxmox Backup Server
Free- No subscriptionFree
- Full functionality with no capacity limit
- Community package repository
- Community forum support
- Subscription$undefined/year
- Priced per CPU socket per year
- Access to the enterprise package repository
- Vendor support tickets
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Free- StarterFree
- Functionally the same as Enterprise
- Limited on scale and support
- Intended for evaluation and small non-production clusters
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Licensed per worker node, quoted annually
- Available through AWS, Azure and Google Cloud marketplaces
- Vendor support with SLAs
Which should you pick?
Choose Proxmox Backup Server if
- You need deduplicated chunk store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want incremental guest backups.
Choose Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes if
- You need application-aware capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want policy engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Proxmox Backup Server or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes better?
- Neither clearly leads. Proxmox Backup Server starts at Free and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Proxmox Backup Server or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes?
- Proxmox Backup Server starts at Free and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes at Free.
- Does Proxmox Backup Server or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes run on more platforms?
- Proxmox Backup Server runs on Linux. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes runs on Kubernetes, Linux.
- Can I use Proxmox Backup Server for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Proxmox Backup Server best used for?
- Proxmox Backup Server is most often used for backing up a proxmox ve cluster with incremental block level backups of running guests, replacing a backup product whose licence is priced per socket or per terabyte on a virtualisation estate, proving backup integrity on a schedule rather than discovering corruption during a restore, keeping an encrypted second copy on a remote server or on tape without a third party service. Of those, backing up a proxmox ve cluster with incremental block level backups of running guests and replacing a backup product whose licence is priced per socket or per terabyte on a virtualisation estate are not what Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes is typically brought in for.
- What can Proxmox Backup Server do that Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes cannot?
- Proxmox Backup Server covers Deduplicated chunk store, Incremental guest backups, Client side encryption, Verification jobs. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes covers Application-aware capture, Policy engine, Immutable targets, Restore transformation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proxmox Backup Server: Can it back up machines that are not on Proxmox?
Linux hosts yes, through the client, at file level. Other hypervisors and physical Windows machines are outside its scope.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes: Is Kasten K10 still a product?
It is now sold as Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes. The kasten.io domain redirects to Veeam and the documentation still lives at docs.kasten.io.
Proxmox Backup Server: Is a subscription required?
No. Without one you use the community repository and forum support. The subscription buys the tested enterprise repository and vendor tickets.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes: Is there a free edition?
Yes, the Starter edition is free and functionally complete but limited on scale and support, aimed at evaluation and small non-production clusters.
Proxmox Backup Server: How do I know a backup will restore?
Run verification jobs. They re-read the stored chunks and mark snapshots verified or failed, which is stronger evidence than a successful backup log.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes: How is Enterprise licensed?
Per worker node. Count your nodes, not your capacity, before comparing quotes, because node sizing directly changes the price.
Proxmox Backup Server: What storage should the datastore be on?
Local disks, ideally with ZFS and enough input and output capacity for many small files. Network shares are supported but routinely disappointing.
Related pages
More on Proxmox Backup Server
More on Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Other head to heads
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Bacula
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Kopia
- Proxmox Backup Server vs rustic
- Proxmox Backup Server vs UrBackup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Borg Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Duplicacy
- Proxmox Backup Server vs BDRShield
- Proxmox Backup Server vs HPE StoreOnce
- Proxmox Backup Server vs HYCU
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Portworx Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Velero
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Apple Time Machine
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Arcserve UDP
- Proxmox Backup Server vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Axcient x360Recover
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Bacula Enterprise
- Proxmox Backup Server vs CloudCasa
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Redstor
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Trilio
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Rewind
- Proxmox Backup Server vs IBM Storage Protect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Macrium Reflect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Micro Focus Data Protector
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Bacula
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Kopia
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs rustic
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs UrBackup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Borg Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Duplicacy
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs BDRShield
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs HPE StoreOnce
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs HYCU
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Portworx Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Velero
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Apple Time Machine
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Arcserve UDP
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Axcient x360Recover
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Bacula Enterprise
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs CloudCasa
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Redstor
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Trilio
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Rewind
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs IBM Storage Protect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Macrium Reflect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Micro Focus Data Protector
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Quest NetVault Backup
