Backup · head to head
Portworx Backup vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes

Portworx Backup
Backup
Kubernetes application backup with a free tier up to one terabyte
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Backup
Kubernetes-native backup, disaster recovery and application mobility
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Portworx Backup the paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.; Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes licensing is per worker node, so clusters designed with many small nodes for scheduling flexibility pay considerably more than the same capacity in fewer large nodes.
- They diverge on capability: Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup, Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes covers Application-aware capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Portworx Backup and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes actually diverge.
| Attribute | Portworx Backup | Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per node hour | Per worker node |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Kubernetes, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Portworx Backup
- Application-level backup
- Any CSI provider
- Cross-cluster restore
- Namespace and label selection
- Scheduled policies
- Role-based access
- Free tier
Only in Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Application-aware capture
- Policy engine
- Immutable targets
- Restore transformation
- Database hooks
- Ransomware detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Portworx Backup
- A platform team running Velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failuresnot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Protecting Kubernetes applications across EKS, GKE and on premises clusters under one policy setnot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Restoring a namespace into a different cloud provider as a disaster recovery testnot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- A small team that wants real Kubernetes backup within the free one terabyte tier before committing budgetnot Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- A platform team that must prove to auditors it can restore a production namespace, not just its disksnot Portworx Backup
- Migrating a stateful application from on-premises OpenShift to a managed cloud Kubernetes servicenot Portworx Backup
- Protecting Kubernetes workloads to an immutable object store so ransomware cannot delete the backupsnot Portworx Backup
- A team using operators and custom resources that volume-snapshot tools silently fail to capturenot Portworx Backup
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Portworx Backup
- The paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- It is licensed separately from Portworx Enterprise, so organisations that assumed storage and backup came together find a second subscription in the quote.
- The free tier caps at one terabyte of protected data, which is quickly exceeded by any database of consequence and forces a jump straight to the minimum commitment.
- Backup targets are object stores you provide, so restore egress charges from your cloud provider are outside the vendor price and appear during a recovery rather than in procurement.
- Application-consistent backup of databases still depends on correct pre and post hooks, so the product does not remove the requirement to understand and rehearse your own restore ordering.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Licensing is per worker node, so clusters designed with many small nodes for scheduling flexibility pay considerably more than the same capacity in fewer large nodes.
- The free Starter edition is scale limited and community supported, so it works for evaluation and small clusters but there is no gentle upgrade path when production grows past the limit.
- Backup performance depends on the underlying CSI driver snapshot capability, so on storage without proper CSI snapshot support it falls back to slower generic copying.
- Restores into a different cluster need matching custom resource definitions and operator versions present beforehand, so cross-cluster mobility is less automatic than the marketing suggests.
- Kasten protects Kubernetes only, so organisations with mixed virtual machine and container estates run it alongside a separate backup product and manage two retention policies and two sets of evidence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Portworx Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Up to one terabyte of protected data
- No feature restrictions
- Fully managed service
- Portworx Backup$0.2/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Unlimited protected capacity
- Any Container Storage Interface provider
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Free- StarterFree
- Functionally the same as Enterprise
- Limited on scale and support
- Intended for evaluation and small non-production clusters
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Licensed per worker node, quoted annually
- Available through AWS, Azure and Google Cloud marketplaces
- Vendor support with SLAs
Which should you pick?
Choose Portworx Backup if
- You need application-level backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want any csi provider.
Choose Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes if
- You need application-aware capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want policy engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Portworx Backup or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes better?
- Neither clearly leads. Portworx Backup starts at Free and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Portworx Backup or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes?
- Portworx Backup starts at Free and Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes at Free.
- Does Portworx Backup or Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes run on more platforms?
- Portworx Backup runs on Web, Linux. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes runs on Kubernetes, Linux.
- Can I use Portworx Backup for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Portworx Backup best used for?
- Portworx Backup is most often used for a platform team running velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failures, protecting kubernetes applications across eks, gke and on premises clusters under one policy set, restoring a namespace into a different cloud provider as a disaster recovery test, a small team that wants real kubernetes backup within the free one terabyte tier before committing budget. Of those, a platform team running velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failures and protecting kubernetes applications across eks, gke and on premises clusters under one policy set are not what Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes is typically brought in for.
- What can Portworx Backup do that Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes cannot?
- Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup, Any CSI provider, Cross-cluster restore, Namespace and label selection. Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes covers Application-aware capture, Policy engine, Immutable targets, Restore transformation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Portworx Backup: Is the free tier real?
Yes, up to one terabyte of protected data with no feature restrictions as a managed service. It is a usable production tier for small footprints, not a trial.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes: Is Kasten K10 still a product?
It is now sold as Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes. The kasten.io domain redirects to Veeam and the documentation still lives at docs.kasten.io.
Portworx Backup: Does it only protect Portworx volumes?
No. It works across Container Storage Interface providers, including cloud provider storage and other vendors' drivers.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes: Is there a free edition?
Yes, the Starter edition is free and functionally complete but limited on scale and support, aimed at evaluation and small non-production clusters.
Portworx Backup: Is it included with Portworx Enterprise?
No. It is a separate licence at 0.20 USD per node hour with its own minimum.
Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes: How is Enterprise licensed?
Per worker node. Count your nodes, not your capacity, before comparing quotes, because node sizing directly changes the price.
Related pages
More on Portworx Backup
More on Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
Other head to heads
- Portworx Backup vs Velero
- Portworx Backup vs Trilio
- Portworx Backup vs HYCU
- Portworx Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Portworx Backup vs BDRShield
- Portworx Backup vs CloudCasa
- Portworx Backup vs Kopia
- Portworx Backup vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Portworx Backup vs Redstor
- Portworx Backup vs rustic
- Portworx Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Portworx Backup vs Datto Backup
- Portworx Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Portworx Backup vs MSP360 Backup
- Portworx Backup vs N-able Backup
- Portworx Backup vs OwnBackup
- Portworx Backup vs Duplicacy
- Portworx Backup vs Rewind
- Portworx Backup vs Apple Time Machine
- Portworx Backup vs IBM Storage Protect
- Portworx Backup vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Portworx Backup vs Macrium Reflect
- Portworx Backup vs Micro Focus Data Protector
- Portworx Backup vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Portworx Backup vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Velero
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Trilio
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs HYCU
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs BDRShield
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs CloudCasa
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Kopia
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Redstor
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs rustic
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Datto Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs HPE StoreOnce
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs MSP360 Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs N-able Backup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs OwnBackup
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Duplicacy
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Rewind
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Apple Time Machine
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs IBM Storage Protect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Macrium Reflect
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Micro Focus Data Protector
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes vs Quest NetVault Backup
