Backup · head to head
Micro Focus Data Protector vs Proxmox Backup Server

Micro Focus Data Protector
Backup
Enterprise backup for multi-platform environments
- From
- $75/month
- Rated
- -

Proxmox Backup Server
Backup
Deduplicating backup server for virtual machines, containers and Linux hosts, with verification built in
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Proxmox Backup Server has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Micro Focus Data Protector micro Focus Data Protector was rebranded to OpenText Data Protector following the OpenText acquisition of Micro Focus; the vendor's own product pages carry no published pricing at either name (Internet Archive capture, 10 January 2022, and live site check); Proxmox Backup Server there is no Windows client, so physical Windows machines must be backed up by something else and the estate ends up with two backup products.
- They diverge on capability: Micro Focus Data Protector covers Zero downtime backup, Proxmox Backup Server covers Deduplicated chunk store.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Micro Focus Data Protector and Proxmox Backup Server actually diverge.
| Attribute | Micro Focus Data Protector | Proxmox Backup Server |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $75/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web | Linux |
| Founded | 1976 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Micro Focus Data Protector
- Zero downtime backup
- Instant recovery
- Application integration
- Synthetic full backup
- Granular recovery
- Centralized management
- VMware
- Hyper-V
Only in Proxmox Backup Server
- Deduplicated chunk store
- Incremental guest backups
- Client side encryption
- Verification jobs
- Remote sync
- Live restore and file level restore
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Micro Focus Data Protector
- Data protectionnot Proxmox Backup Server
- Disaster recoverynot Proxmox Backup Server
- Business continuitynot Proxmox Backup Server
- Ransomware protectionnot Proxmox Backup Server
- Compliancenot Proxmox Backup Server
Proxmox Backup Server
- Backing up a Proxmox VE cluster with incremental block level backups of running guestsnot Micro Focus Data Protector
- Replacing a backup product whose licence is priced per socket or per terabyte on a virtualisation estatenot Micro Focus Data Protector
- Proving backup integrity on a schedule rather than discovering corruption during a restorenot Micro Focus Data Protector
- Keeping an encrypted second copy on a remote server or on tape without a third party servicenot Micro Focus Data Protector
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Micro Focus Data Protector
- Micro Focus Data Protector was rebranded to OpenText Data Protector following the OpenText acquisition of Micro Focus; the vendor's own product pages carry no published pricing at either name (Internet Archive capture, 10 January 2022, and live site check)
Proxmox Backup Server
- There is no Windows client, so physical Windows machines must be backed up by something else and the estate ends up with two backup products.
- The datastore is millions of small chunk files, so it needs storage with real input and output capability and performs poorly on a single spinning disk or an SMB or NFS share.
- Deduplication is per datastore, so splitting workloads across datastores for retention or tenancy reasons multiplies the storage those workloads consume.
- Garbage collection depends on file access time semantics on the underlying filesystem, so a datastore mounted with the wrong options can fail to reclaim space or, worse, behave unpredictably.
- Subscriptions are priced per CPU socket per year, so a backup server consolidated onto fewer larger dual socket machines pays twice per host for the supported repository.
Pricing, plan by plan
Micro Focus Data Protector
$75/month- Data Protector$75/month
- Zero downtime backup
- Instant recovery
- Multi-platform
Proxmox Backup Server
Free- No subscriptionFree
- Full functionality with no capacity limit
- Community package repository
- Community forum support
- Subscription$undefined/year
- Priced per CPU socket per year
- Access to the enterprise package repository
- Vendor support tickets
Which should you pick?
Choose Micro Focus Data Protector if
- You need zero downtime backup.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want instant recovery.
Choose Proxmox Backup Server if
- You need deduplicated chunk store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want incremental guest backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Micro Focus Data Protector or Proxmox Backup Server better?
- Neither clearly leads. Micro Focus Data Protector starts at $75/month and Proxmox Backup Server at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Micro Focus Data Protector or Proxmox Backup Server?
- Proxmox Backup Server has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $75/month for Micro Focus Data Protector and Free for Proxmox Backup Server.
- Does Micro Focus Data Protector or Proxmox Backup Server run on more platforms?
- Micro Focus Data Protector runs on Windows, Linux, Web. Proxmox Backup Server runs on Linux.
- Can I use Proxmox Backup Server for free?
- Yes. Proxmox Backup Server has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Micro Focus Data Protector starts at $75/month.
- What is Micro Focus Data Protector best used for?
- Micro Focus Data Protector is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Proxmox Backup Server is typically brought in for.
- What can Micro Focus Data Protector do that Proxmox Backup Server cannot?
- Micro Focus Data Protector covers Zero downtime backup, Instant recovery, Application integration, Synthetic full backup. Proxmox Backup Server covers Deduplicated chunk store, Incremental guest backups, Client side encryption, Verification jobs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proxmox Backup Server: Can it back up machines that are not on Proxmox?
Linux hosts yes, through the client, at file level. Other hypervisors and physical Windows machines are outside its scope.
Proxmox Backup Server: Is a subscription required?
No. Without one you use the community repository and forum support. The subscription buys the tested enterprise repository and vendor tickets.
Proxmox Backup Server: How do I know a backup will restore?
Run verification jobs. They re-read the stored chunks and mark snapshots verified or failed, which is stronger evidence than a successful backup log.
Proxmox Backup Server: What storage should the datastore be on?
Local disks, ideally with ZFS and enough input and output capacity for many small files. Network shares are supported but routinely disappointing.
Related pages
More on Micro Focus Data Protector
More on Proxmox Backup Server
Other head to heads
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs CloudAlly
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Backupify
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Spanning Backup
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Arcserve UDP
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs IBM Storage Protect
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs OwnBackup
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Velero
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs CloudCasa
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Datto Backup
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs HPE StoreOnce
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Kopia
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Bacula
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs rustic
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs UrBackup
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Borg Backup
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Duplicacy
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs BDRShield
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs HYCU
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Portworx Backup
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Apple Time Machine
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Axcient x360Recover
- Micro Focus Data Protector vs Bacula Enterprise
- Proxmox Backup Server vs CloudAlly
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Backupify
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Spanning Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Arcserve UDP
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Proxmox Backup Server vs IBM Storage Protect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Proxmox Backup Server vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs OwnBackup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Velero
- Proxmox Backup Server vs CloudCasa
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Datto Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs HPE StoreOnce
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Kopia
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Bacula
- Proxmox Backup Server vs rustic
- Proxmox Backup Server vs UrBackup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Borg Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Duplicacy
- Proxmox Backup Server vs BDRShield
- Proxmox Backup Server vs HYCU
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Portworx Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Apple Time Machine
- Proxmox Backup Server vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Axcient x360Recover
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Bacula Enterprise
