Manufacturing · head to head
AVEVA System Platform vs Propel

AVEVA System Platform
Manufacturing
Supervisory HMI and SCADA platform, formerly sold as Wonderware System Platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Propel
Manufacturing
PLM, quality and product information management built on the Salesforce platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AVEVA System Platform wonderware is no longer a name you can buy; if you have inherited documentation, purchase orders or job specifications that say Wonderware, everything has to be re-mapped to AVEVA product names before you can quote it.; Propel your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- They diverge on capability: AVEVA System Platform covers ArchestrA object model, Propel covers Item and BOM management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AVEVA System Platform and Propel actually diverge.
| Attribute | AVEVA System Platform | Propel |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AVEVA System Platform
- ArchestrA object model
- InTouch HMI
- AVEVA Historian
- Redundancy
- Situational awareness graphics
- OMI
- Alarm management
- Connectivity
Only in Propel
- Item and BOM management
- Change management
- Quality management
- Product information management
- Supplier collaboration
- Native Salesforce
- Licence types
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AVEVA System Platform
- A multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different PLC brandsnot Propel
- A water utility with a decade of ArchestrA templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justifiednot Propel
- A pharmaceutical line needing ISA-88 batch recipe handling above existing Rockwell and Siemens controllersnot Propel
- A plant modernising legacy InTouch applications without discarding the existing screens and scriptsnot Propel
Propel
- A medical device company needing linked design control and CAPA records for an ISO 13485 audit without an on-premise PLM programmenot AVEVA System Platform
- A consumer products firm publishing the same product record to engineering, packaging and e-commerce teamsnot AVEVA System Platform
- A company already standardised on Salesforce that wants product data governed with the same admin skills as the CRMnot AVEVA System Platform
- A hardware manufacturer routing customer complaints straight to the part revision and supplier that caused themnot AVEVA System Platform
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AVEVA System Platform
- Wonderware is no longer a name you can buy; if you have inherited documentation, purchase orders or job specifications that say Wonderware, everything has to be re-mapped to AVEVA product names before you can quote it.
- AVEVA Flex converts licensing to a recurring subscription draw-down, so organisations that budgeted for a perpetual licence with a support percentage face a materially different cost model at renewal.
- It is Windows only, and version compatibility between System Platform, Historian and InTouch is tight, so upgrades are coordinated projects rather than incremental patches.
- The ArchestrA object model has a steep learning curve and small systems end up paying for structure they do not need, which is why integrators often deploy standalone InTouch instead.
- Licence enforcement counts I/O aggressively and unexpected tag growth during commissioning can trigger a mid-project licence purchase at list price.
Propel
- Your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- CAD data management is handled through connectors rather than natively; Propel manages metadata and files well but is not a substitute for a CAD vault on large assemblies.
- The published cost bands are extremely wide, from 10,000 to 500,000 US dollars a year, and setup can approach the annual licence, so early budgeting without a scoped quote is close to meaningless.
- Licence roles are split across Performance, Quality, Enrichment, Collaboration and Partner types, and buyers frequently discover mid-project that a user needs a more expensive role than budgeted.
- Salesforce platform limits such as governor limits, API call ceilings and storage allowances apply, and organisations with very large BOMs or heavy integration traffic hit them in ways a purpose-built PLM would not surface.
Pricing, plan by plan
AVEVA System Platform
On request- AVEVA System Platform$undefined/year
- Licensed by I/O count, client count and platform nodes
- Sold through AVEVA Flex subscription token pool or legacy perpetual licence
- Legacy perpetual licences carry an annual customer FIRST support fee
Propel
On request- Propel$undefined/year
- Annual user-based licensing in role types
- Salesforce platform access included in each licence
- Indicative small deployment band of 10,000 to 150,000 USD a year plus 10,000 to 25,000 setup
Which should you pick?
Choose AVEVA System Platform if
- You need archestra object model.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want intouch hmi.
Choose Propel if
- You need item and bom management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- You also want change management.
Questions people ask
- Is AVEVA System Platform or Propel better?
- Neither clearly leads. AVEVA System Platform starts at On request and Propel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AVEVA System Platform or Propel?
- AVEVA System Platform starts at On request and Propel at On request.
- Does AVEVA System Platform or Propel run on more platforms?
- AVEVA System Platform runs on Windows. Propel runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- What is AVEVA System Platform best used for?
- AVEVA System Platform is most often used for a multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different plc brands, a water utility with a decade of archestra templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justified, a pharmaceutical line needing isa-88 batch recipe handling above existing rockwell and siemens controllers, a plant modernising legacy intouch applications without discarding the existing screens and scripts. Of those, a multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different plc brands and a water utility with a decade of archestra templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justified are not what Propel is typically brought in for.
- What can AVEVA System Platform do that Propel cannot?
- AVEVA System Platform covers ArchestrA object model, InTouch HMI, AVEVA Historian, Redundancy. Propel covers Item and BOM management, Change management, Quality management, Product information management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AVEVA System Platform: Is Wonderware still sold?
No. The brand was retired; buy AVEVA System Platform, AVEVA InTouch HMI, AVEVA Historian or AVEVA Plant SCADA instead.
Propel: Do I need to buy Salesforce separately?
No. Each Propel licence includes Salesforce platform access, and end users do not need their own Salesforce licences or Salesforce expertise.
AVEVA System Platform: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
AVEVA steers new business to Flex subscriptions. Perpetual is increasingly restricted to existing agreements and renewals.
Propel: Does being on Salesforce lock me in?
Practically, yes. The application, its configuration and your product data all sit in a Salesforce org, which is a real consideration at renewal.
AVEVA System Platform: Do my old InTouch applications still run?
Yes, legacy InTouch applications are supported in System Platform, though the older graphics do not gain the newer situational-awareness features without rework.
Propel: What does it cost?
Propel publishes indicative bands rather than list prices: roughly 10,000 to 150,000 US dollars a year for a small deployment and 250,000 to 500,000 for a large one, plus setup.
AVEVA System Platform: What is AVEVA Flex?
A subscription credit pool you draw against for any AVEVA product, which trades a fixed licence for a recurring balance you must keep topped up.
Propel: Is it suitable for regulated medical devices?
Yes, that is a core segment; the quality module covers CAPA, non-conformance, audits and training records with electronic signatures.
Related pages
More on AVEVA System Platform
Other head to heads
- AVEVA System Platform vs Ignition
- AVEVA System Platform vs ABB 800xA
- AVEVA System Platform vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- AVEVA System Platform vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- AVEVA System Platform vs GENESIS Version 11
- AVEVA System Platform vs COPA-DATA zenon
- AVEVA System Platform vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- AVEVA System Platform vs Seeq
- AVEVA System Platform vs SolidWorks
- AVEVA System Platform vs Materialise Magics
- AVEVA System Platform vs Aras Innovator
- AVEVA System Platform vs KCF Technologies
- AVEVA System Platform vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AVEVA System Platform vs LabVIEW
- AVEVA System Platform vs SKF Enlight Centre
- AVEVA System Platform vs Hippo CMMS
- AVEVA System Platform vs Arena PLM
- AVEVA System Platform vs OpenBOM
- AVEVA System Platform vs Fusion 360
- AVEVA System Platform vs TrakSYS
- AVEVA System Platform vs Litmus Edge
- AVEVA System Platform vs PTC Windchill
- Propel vs Ignition
- Propel vs ABB 800xA
- Propel vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Propel vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Propel vs GENESIS Version 11
- Propel vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Propel vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Propel vs Seeq
- Propel vs SolidWorks
- Propel vs Materialise Magics
- Propel vs Aras Innovator
- Propel vs KCF Technologies
- Propel vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Propel vs LabVIEW
- Propel vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Propel vs Hippo CMMS
- Propel vs Arena PLM
- Propel vs OpenBOM
- Propel vs Fusion 360
- Propel vs TrakSYS
- Propel vs Litmus Edge
- Propel vs PTC Windchill
