Manufacturing · head to head
AVEVA System Platform vs LabVIEW

AVEVA System Platform
Manufacturing
Supervisory HMI and SCADA platform, formerly sold as Wonderware System Platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

LabVIEW
Manufacturing
Graphical dataflow programming for automated test, measurement and instrument control
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AVEVA System Platform wonderware is no longer a name you can buy; if you have inherited documentation, purchase orders or job specifications that say Wonderware, everything has to be re-mapped to AVEVA product names before you can quote it.; LabVIEW nI is now part of Emerson, completing in 2023, so LabVIEW sits inside an industrial automation conglomerate rather than being the flagship of a dedicated test company; roadmap priorities and support pricing follow the parent, not the user base.
- They diverge on capability: AVEVA System Platform covers ArchestrA object model, LabVIEW covers Graphical dataflow programming.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AVEVA System Platform and LabVIEW actually diverge.
| Attribute | AVEVA System Platform | LabVIEW |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, Linux, macOS |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AVEVA System Platform
- ArchestrA object model
- InTouch HMI
- AVEVA Historian
- Redundancy
- Situational awareness graphics
- OMI
- Alarm management
- Connectivity
Only in LabVIEW
- Graphical dataflow programming
- Front panels
- Instrument driver library
- Hardware integration
- Real-time and FPGA targets
- Analysis and signal processing
- Application builder
- Nigel AI assistant
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AVEVA System Platform
- A multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different PLC brandsnot LabVIEW
- A water utility with a decade of ArchestrA templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justifiednot LabVIEW
- A pharmaceutical line needing ISA-88 batch recipe handling above existing Rockwell and Siemens controllersnot LabVIEW
- A plant modernising legacy InTouch applications without discarding the existing screens and scriptsnot LabVIEW
LabVIEW
- An automotive supplier building an end-of-line test rig that must drive a power supply, read a scope and log pass/fail against a serial numbernot AVEVA System Platform
- A semiconductor lab characterising devices across a PXI chassis where deterministic timing between instruments mattersnot AVEVA System Platform
- A medical device manufacturer needing a validated, documented test system with an operator front panel a technician can run unsupervisednot AVEVA System Platform
- A research group prototyping a control loop on CompactRIO where part of the logic must compile down to an FPGAnot AVEVA System Platform
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AVEVA System Platform
- Wonderware is no longer a name you can buy; if you have inherited documentation, purchase orders or job specifications that say Wonderware, everything has to be re-mapped to AVEVA product names before you can quote it.
- AVEVA Flex converts licensing to a recurring subscription draw-down, so organisations that budgeted for a perpetual licence with a support percentage face a materially different cost model at renewal.
- It is Windows only, and version compatibility between System Platform, Historian and InTouch is tight, so upgrades are coordinated projects rather than incremental patches.
- The ArchestrA object model has a steep learning curve and small systems end up paying for structure they do not need, which is why integrators often deploy standalone InTouch instead.
- Licence enforcement counts I/O aggressively and unexpected tag growth during commissioning can trigger a mid-project licence purchase at list price.
LabVIEW
- NI is now part of Emerson, completing in 2023, so LabVIEW sits inside an industrial automation conglomerate rather than being the flagship of a dedicated test company; roadmap priorities and support pricing follow the parent, not the user base.
- No prices appear anywhere on the NI site for commercial editions; Base, Full, Professional and the LabVIEW+ suite are all quoted through NI or a reseller, so a buyer cannot compare cost against a Python-plus-PyVISA alternative without opening a sales conversation.
- Graphical source code diffs badly. Merging two engineers’ changes to the same virtual instrument in git is impractical without NI’s own comparison tools, so team development on LabVIEW is slower and more serialised than on text-based languages.
- The pool of engineers who write LabVIEW is small and ageing relative to the pool who write Python, so hiring a replacement for the person who built your test rig is materially harder and more expensive than replacing a general software engineer.
- The environment pulls you toward NI hardware and NI add-on toolkits, and licences for real-time, FPGA and vision modules are sold separately on top of the base edition, so the quoted LabVIEW price is rarely the delivered cost of a working test system.
Pricing, plan by plan
AVEVA System Platform
On request- AVEVA System Platform$undefined/year
- Licensed by I/O count, client count and platform nodes
- Sold through AVEVA Flex subscription token pool or legacy perpetual licence
- Legacy perpetual licences carry an annual customer FIRST support fee
LabVIEW
On request- LabVIEW Community EditionFree
- Free for personal, non-commercial use only
- Full LabVIEW feature set for hobbyists
- No commercial deployment rights
- LabVIEW Base$undefined/year
- Core acquisition, control and user interface capability
- Suited to simple test and measurement applications
- Available as subscription or perpetual licence
- LabVIEW Full$undefined/year
- Adds advanced analysis and signal processing
- Recommended where mathematics and filtering are required
- Available as subscription or perpetual licence
- LabVIEW Professional$undefined/year
- Adds application builder, source control and deployment tooling
- Includes the Nigel AI assistant
- Available as subscription or perpetual licence
Which should you pick?
Choose AVEVA System Platform if
- You need archestra object model.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want intouch hmi.
Choose LabVIEW if
- You need graphical dataflow programming.
- You work on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- You also want front panels.
Questions people ask
- Is AVEVA System Platform or LabVIEW better?
- Neither clearly leads. AVEVA System Platform starts at On request and LabVIEW at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AVEVA System Platform or LabVIEW?
- AVEVA System Platform starts at On request and LabVIEW at On request.
- Does AVEVA System Platform or LabVIEW run on more platforms?
- AVEVA System Platform runs on Windows. LabVIEW runs on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- What is AVEVA System Platform best used for?
- AVEVA System Platform is most often used for a multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different plc brands, a water utility with a decade of archestra templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justified, a pharmaceutical line needing isa-88 batch recipe handling above existing rockwell and siemens controllers, a plant modernising legacy intouch applications without discarding the existing screens and scripts. Of those, a multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different plc brands and a water utility with a decade of archestra templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justified are not what LabVIEW is typically brought in for.
- What can AVEVA System Platform do that LabVIEW cannot?
- AVEVA System Platform covers ArchestrA object model, InTouch HMI, AVEVA Historian, Redundancy. LabVIEW covers Graphical dataflow programming, Front panels, Instrument driver library, Hardware integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AVEVA System Platform: Is Wonderware still sold?
No. The brand was retired; buy AVEVA System Platform, AVEVA InTouch HMI, AVEVA Historian or AVEVA Plant SCADA instead.
LabVIEW: Who owns LabVIEW now?
NI, formerly National Instruments, was acquired by Emerson in an acquisition that completed in 2023. LabVIEW is now an Emerson product.
AVEVA System Platform: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
AVEVA steers new business to Flex subscriptions. Perpetual is increasingly restricted to existing agreements and renewals.
LabVIEW: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Yes. NI offers both subscription and perpetual licences and states there are no functional or feature-level differences between them.
AVEVA System Platform: Do my old InTouch applications still run?
Yes, legacy InTouch applications are supported in System Platform, though the older graphics do not gain the newer situational-awareness features without rework.
LabVIEW: Is there a free version?
LabVIEW Community Edition is free for personal, non-commercial use. It carries no commercial deployment rights.
AVEVA System Platform: What is AVEVA Flex?
A subscription credit pool you draw against for any AVEVA product, which trades a fixed licence for a recurring balance you must keep topped up.
LabVIEW: How much does it cost?
NI does not publish commercial edition prices. Base, Full, Professional and LabVIEW+ are all quoted through NI or a reseller.
Related pages
More on AVEVA System Platform
Other head to heads
- AVEVA System Platform vs Ignition
- AVEVA System Platform vs ABB 800xA
- AVEVA System Platform vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- AVEVA System Platform vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- AVEVA System Platform vs GENESIS Version 11
- AVEVA System Platform vs COPA-DATA zenon
- AVEVA System Platform vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- AVEVA System Platform vs Seeq
- AVEVA System Platform vs SolidWorks
- AVEVA System Platform vs Materialise Magics
- AVEVA System Platform vs Aras Innovator
- AVEVA System Platform vs Propel
- AVEVA System Platform vs KCF Technologies
- AVEVA System Platform vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AVEVA System Platform vs SKF Enlight Centre
- AVEVA System Platform vs Hippo CMMS
- AVEVA System Platform vs Erbessd Instruments
- AVEVA System Platform vs Dyndrite
- AVEVA System Platform vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- AVEVA System Platform vs AMFG
- AVEVA System Platform vs Arena PLM
- AVEVA System Platform vs JobBOSS²
- AVEVA System Platform vs Litmus Edge
- AVEVA System Platform vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- AVEVA System Platform vs Fusion 360
- AVEVA System Platform vs Paperless Parts
- AVEVA System Platform vs Petasense
- AVEVA System Platform vs Poseidon Systems
- AVEVA System Platform vs PROGNOST Systems
- AVEVA System Platform vs PTC Windchill
- AVEVA System Platform vs Prodsmart
- LabVIEW vs Ignition
- LabVIEW vs ABB 800xA
- LabVIEW vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- LabVIEW vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- LabVIEW vs GENESIS Version 11
- LabVIEW vs COPA-DATA zenon
- LabVIEW vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- LabVIEW vs Seeq
- LabVIEW vs SolidWorks
- LabVIEW vs Materialise Magics
- LabVIEW vs Aras Innovator
- LabVIEW vs Propel
- LabVIEW vs KCF Technologies
- LabVIEW vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- LabVIEW vs SKF Enlight Centre
- LabVIEW vs Hippo CMMS
- LabVIEW vs Erbessd Instruments
- LabVIEW vs Dyndrite
- LabVIEW vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- LabVIEW vs AMFG
- LabVIEW vs Arena PLM
- LabVIEW vs JobBOSS²
- LabVIEW vs Litmus Edge
- LabVIEW vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- LabVIEW vs Fusion 360
- LabVIEW vs Paperless Parts
- LabVIEW vs Petasense
- LabVIEW vs Poseidon Systems
- LabVIEW vs PROGNOST Systems
- LabVIEW vs PTC Windchill
- LabVIEW vs Prodsmart
