Cybersecurity · head to head
Ping Identity vs Termly

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -

Termly
Cybersecurity
Legal policy generator and cookie consent banner for small websites
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Termly has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.; Termly a standard plan licenses one website, so an agency or a business with several brand domains multiplies the headline price by the number of sites and the cheap option stops being cheap at four or five domains.
- They diverge on capability: Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Termly covers Policy generator.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ping Identity and Termly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ping Identity | Termly |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Per website per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
Only in Termly
- Policy generator
- Automatic policy updates
- Consent banner
- Script auto blocker
- Cookie scanner
- Consent log
- WordPress plugin
- Do not sell handling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Termly
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Termly
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Termly
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Termly
Termly
- A small e-commerce shop that needs a privacy policy, terms and a compliant cookie banner before launch without engaging a solicitornot Ping Identity
- A freelance web developer standardising the legal and consent layer across client sites, buying a licence per site or an agency arrangementnot Ping Identity
- A WordPress site owner who needs scripts blocked before consent and does not have a tag manager set upnot Ping Identity
- A US small business newly in scope for a state privacy law that needs a do not sell opt-out on the site quicklynot Ping Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Termly
- A standard plan licenses one website, so an agency or a business with several brand domains multiplies the headline price by the number of sites and the cheap option stops being cheap at four or five domains.
- Generated policies are templates conditioned on questionnaire answers, so they describe the data practices you claimed rather than the ones your code performs, and a regulator comparing the policy to actual tracking finds the gap not the vendor.
- Banner view limits apply on the lower tiers, and a site that spikes in traffic can exhaust its allowance mid month, which is the worst possible moment for consent handling to degrade.
- It covers websites well but has little for mobile apps, so a company with an iOS and Android app alongside its site needs a second consent mechanism and a second consent record.
- There is no data mapping, subject rights automation or vendor inventory, so any company that grows into real privacy programme obligations outgrows Termly entirely rather than upgrading within it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Termly
Free- FreeFree
- 1 basic legal policy
- 10,000 monthly banner views
- Cookie consent banner
- Starter$10/month
- 2 legal policies
- 10 policy edits
- 50,000 monthly banner views
- Pro Plus$15/month
- Unlimited banner views
- Additional legal policies
- Multilingual banners
Which should you pick?
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Choose Termly if
- You need policy generator.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automatic policy updates.
Questions people ask
- Is Ping Identity or Termly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ping Identity starts at $3/month and Termly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ping Identity or Termly?
- Termly has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3/month for Ping Identity and Free for Termly.
- Does Ping Identity or Termly run on more platforms?
- Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows. Termly runs on Web.
- Can I use Termly for free?
- Yes. Termly has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ping Identity starts at $3/month.
- What is Ping Identity best used for?
- Ping Identity is most often used for a bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running saas identity elsewhere, an airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scale, an enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendors, an existing forgerock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under ping ownership. Of those, a bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running saas identity elsewhere and an airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scale are not what Termly is typically brought in for.
- What can Ping Identity do that Termly cannot?
- Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management. Termly covers Policy generator, Automatic policy updates, Consent banner, Script auto blocker.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Termly: Does one Termly plan cover all my websites?
No. A standard plan licenses one website. Multiple domains need multiple licences or an agency arrangement, and this is the single most common surprise on the bill.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Termly: Are the generated policies legally sufficient?
They are templates conditioned on your answers and are not legal advice. They are proportionate for a simple site and inadequate where actual data flows are complex or regulated.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Termly: Is there a genuinely free plan?
Yes, one basic policy, one site, 10,000 monthly banner views and quarterly cookie scans, with no card required.
Termly: Does it handle US state privacy opt-outs?
Yes, including a do not sell or share mechanism and regional rule sets, alongside GDPR consent for EU visitors.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Osano
- Ping Identity vs Transcend
- Ping Identity vs OneTrust
- Ping Identity vs TrustArc
- Ping Identity vs DataGrail
- Ping Identity vs iDenfy
- Ping Identity vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Ping Identity vs Sumsub
- Ping Identity vs Surfshark
- Ping Identity vs BigID
- Ping Identity vs Very Good Security
- Ping Identity vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Ping Identity vs Windscribe
- Termly vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Termly vs Frontegg
- Termly vs Speakeasy
- Termly vs Akeyless
- Termly vs authentik
- Termly vs Logto
- Termly vs Authelia
- Termly vs Transmit Security
- Termly vs Delinea
- Termly vs Genetec Security Center
- Termly vs VMware Carbon Black
- Termly vs Rhombus Systems
- Termly vs Yoti
- Termly vs Avast One
- Termly vs Chainguard
- Termly vs Cosign
- Termly vs CyberGhost VPN
- Termly vs Osano
- Termly vs Transcend
- Termly vs OneTrust
- Termly vs TrustArc
- Termly vs DataGrail
- Termly vs iDenfy
- Termly vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Termly vs Sumsub
- Termly vs Surfshark
- Termly vs BigID
- Termly vs Very Good Security
- Termly vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Termly vs Windscribe
