Cybersecurity · head to head
BigID vs Ping Identity

BigID
Cybersecurity
Data discovery and classification across cloud, on-premise and unstructured stores
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: BigID pricing scales with data sources and volume, so the cost rises exactly as the estate you need to scan grows, and the modules shown in a demo, including AI security posture and headless deployment, are frequently separate licences that appear only in the final quote.; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: BigID covers Structured and unstructured scanning, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BigID and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | BigID | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web, API, Self-hosted | Web, Linux, Windows |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BigID
- Structured and unstructured scanning
- Identity correlation
- Data security posture management
- Access intelligence
- Privacy request support
- Retention and minimisation
- AI data controls
- Policy and remediation workflow
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BigID
- A bank that has to prove which of thirty year old file shares contain customer identifiers before a data centre migrationnot Ping Identity
- A privacy team that cannot fulfil deletion requests because nobody knows which unstructured stores hold a given customer’s recordsnot Ping Identity
- A security team wanting to find sensitive data sitting in publicly readable object storage buckets before an attacker doesnot Ping Identity
- A company building retrieval augmented AI that must exclude regulated personal data from the index it feeds to a modelnot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot BigID
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot BigID
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot BigID
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot BigID
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BigID
- Pricing scales with data sources and volume, so the cost rises exactly as the estate you need to scan grows, and the modules shown in a demo, including AI security posture and headless deployment, are frequently separate licences that appear only in the final quote.
- Scanning large unstructured estates is slow and computationally expensive, so most organisations sample rather than scan everything, which reintroduces uncertainty into the very question they bought the tool to settle.
- Classification accuracy on messy unstructured content requires tuning, and out of the box false positives on things like reference numbers create a large triage backlog that a small governance team cannot clear.
- It discovers and reports but does not remediate, so realising value requires a separate process and often separate tooling to actually delete, restrict or move the data it flags.
- It is built for large enterprises and both the price and the administrative overhead are disproportionate below a few thousand employees, where a lighter DSPM tool covers the security use case for far less.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
BigID
On request- BigID Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by number of data sources and data volume
- Discovery and classification core
- Optional DSPM, access intelligence and AI security modules licensed separately
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose BigID if
- You need structured and unstructured scanning.
- You work on Web, API, Self-hosted.
- You also want identity correlation.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is BigID or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. BigID starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BigID or Ping Identity?
- BigID starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month.
- Does BigID or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- BigID runs on Web, API, Self-hosted. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is BigID best used for?
- BigID is most often used for a bank that has to prove which of thirty year old file shares contain customer identifiers before a data centre migration, a privacy team that cannot fulfil deletion requests because nobody knows which unstructured stores hold a given customer’s records, a security team wanting to find sensitive data sitting in publicly readable object storage buckets before an attacker does, a company building retrieval augmented ai that must exclude regulated personal data from the index it feeds to a model. Of those, a bank that has to prove which of thirty year old file shares contain customer identifiers before a data centre migration and a privacy team that cannot fulfil deletion requests because nobody knows which unstructured stores hold a given customer’s records are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can BigID do that Ping Identity cannot?
- BigID covers Structured and unstructured scanning, Identity correlation, Data security posture management, Access intelligence. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BigID: What does BigID cost?
It is quoted by data source count and volume. Reported contracts run from roughly 15,000 to 175,000 US dollars a year, and add-on modules such as AI security posture are licensed on top.
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
BigID: Does it handle unstructured data?
Yes, and that is its main advantage. It classifies data in files and shares and correlates findings back to individuals, not just to data types.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
BigID: Will it delete the data it finds?
Not by itself in most deployments. It identifies and routes findings; deletion and remediation happen through your own processes or connected systems.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
BigID: Is it a privacy tool or a security tool?
Both are sold from the same discovery core. Buyers increasingly come from security wanting data security posture management rather than from legal wanting privacy.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- BigID vs Securiti
- BigID vs Transcend
- BigID vs TrustArc
- BigID vs OneTrust
- BigID vs DataGrail
- BigID vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- BigID vs Enpass
- BigID vs Osano
- BigID vs Brave Browser
- BigID vs Private Internet Access
- BigID vs CyberGhost VPN
- BigID vs Netwrix
- BigID vs Drata
- BigID vs DTiQ
- BigID vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- BigID vs Falco
- BigID vs Fenergo
- BigID vs ExpressVPN
- BigID vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- BigID vs Frontegg
- BigID vs Speakeasy
- BigID vs Akeyless
- BigID vs authentik
- BigID vs Logto
- BigID vs Authelia
- BigID vs Transmit Security
- BigID vs Delinea
- BigID vs Genetec Security Center
- BigID vs VMware Carbon Black
- BigID vs Rhombus Systems
- BigID vs Yoti
- BigID vs Avast One
- BigID vs Chainguard
- BigID vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs Securiti
- Ping Identity vs Transcend
- Ping Identity vs TrustArc
- Ping Identity vs OneTrust
- Ping Identity vs DataGrail
- Ping Identity vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Ping Identity vs Enpass
- Ping Identity vs Osano
- Ping Identity vs Brave Browser
- Ping Identity vs Private Internet Access
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Netwrix
- Ping Identity vs Drata
- Ping Identity vs DTiQ
- Ping Identity vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Ping Identity vs Falco
- Ping Identity vs Fenergo
- Ping Identity vs ExpressVPN
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
