Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Termly

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Termly
Cybersecurity
Legal policy generator and cookie consent banner for small websites
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Termly a standard plan licenses one website, so an agency or a business with several brand domains multiplies the headline price by the number of sites and the cheap option stops being cheap at four or five domains.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Termly covers Policy generator.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Termly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Termly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Per website per month |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Termly
- Policy generator
- Automatic policy updates
- Consent banner
- Script auto blocker
- Cookie scanner
- Consent log
- WordPress plugin
- Do not sell handling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Termly
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Termly
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Termly
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Termly
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Termly
Termly
- A small e-commerce shop that needs a privacy policy, terms and a compliant cookie banner before launch without engaging a solicitornot Chainguard
- A freelance web developer standardising the legal and consent layer across client sites, buying a licence per site or an agency arrangementnot Chainguard
- A WordPress site owner who needs scripts blocked before consent and does not have a tag manager set upnot Chainguard
- A US small business newly in scope for a state privacy law that needs a do not sell opt-out on the site quicklynot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Termly
- A standard plan licenses one website, so an agency or a business with several brand domains multiplies the headline price by the number of sites and the cheap option stops being cheap at four or five domains.
- Generated policies are templates conditioned on questionnaire answers, so they describe the data practices you claimed rather than the ones your code performs, and a regulator comparing the policy to actual tracking finds the gap not the vendor.
- Banner view limits apply on the lower tiers, and a site that spikes in traffic can exhaust its allowance mid month, which is the worst possible moment for consent handling to degrade.
- It covers websites well but has little for mobile apps, so a company with an iOS and Android app alongside its site needs a second consent mechanism and a second consent record.
- There is no data mapping, subject rights automation or vendor inventory, so any company that grows into real privacy programme obligations outgrows Termly entirely rather than upgrading within it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Termly
Free- FreeFree
- 1 basic legal policy
- 10,000 monthly banner views
- Cookie consent banner
- Starter$10/month
- 2 legal policies
- 10 policy edits
- 50,000 monthly banner views
- Pro Plus$15/month
- Unlimited banner views
- Additional legal policies
- Multilingual banners
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Termly if
- You need policy generator.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automatic policy updates.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Termly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Termly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Termly?
- Chainguard starts at Free and Termly at Free.
- Does Chainguard or Termly run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Termly runs on Web.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Termly is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Termly cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Termly covers Policy generator, Automatic policy updates, Consent banner, Script auto blocker.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceTermly: Does one Termly plan cover all my websites?
No. A standard plan licenses one website. Multiple domains need multiple licences or an agency arrangement, and this is the single most common surprise on the bill.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceTermly: Are the generated policies legally sufficient?
They are templates conditioned on your answers and are not legal advice. They are proportionate for a simple site and inadequate where actual data flows are complex or regulated.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceTermly: Is there a genuinely free plan?
Yes, one basic policy, one site, 10,000 monthly banner views and quarterly cookie scans, with no card required.
Termly: Does it handle US state privacy opt-outs?
Yes, including a do not sell or share mechanism and regional rule sets, alongside GDPR consent for EU visitors.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Osano
- Chainguard vs Transcend
- Chainguard vs OneTrust
- Chainguard vs TrustArc
- Chainguard vs DataGrail
- Chainguard vs iDenfy
- Chainguard vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Chainguard vs Sumsub
- Chainguard vs CyberGhost VPN
- Chainguard vs Surfshark
- Chainguard vs BigID
- Chainguard vs Genetec Security Center
- Chainguard vs Very Good Security
- Chainguard vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Chainguard vs Windscribe
- Chainguard vs Yoti
- Chainguard vs authentik
- Chainguard vs Avast One
- Termly vs Snyk
- Termly vs Trivy
- Termly vs Doppler
- Termly vs Infisical
- Termly vs Grype
- Termly vs Arnica
- Termly vs HashiCorp Vault
- Termly vs Bitwarden
- Termly vs Semgrep
- Termly vs Authelia
- Termly vs Endor Labs
- Termly vs Tenable
- Termly vs Hanwha Vision
- Termly vs Idira
- Termly vs IVPN
- Termly vs Logto
- Termly vs Malwarebytes
- Termly vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Termly vs Osano
- Termly vs Transcend
- Termly vs OneTrust
- Termly vs TrustArc
- Termly vs DataGrail
- Termly vs iDenfy
- Termly vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Termly vs Sumsub
- Termly vs CyberGhost VPN
- Termly vs Surfshark
- Termly vs BigID
- Termly vs Genetec Security Center
- Termly vs Very Good Security
- Termly vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Termly vs Windscribe
- Termly vs Yoti
- Termly vs authentik
- Termly vs Avast One
