Payroll · head to head
Payhawk vs Spendbase

Payhawk
Payroll
Modular spend management combining corporate cards, accounts payable, procurement and travel
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Spendbase
Accounting
SaaS and cloud spend management that charges a share of the savings it finds rather than a licence
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Spendbase has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Payhawk buying the full stack of Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Procurement separately costs more than a single suite price, since each module carries its own flat monthly fee.; Spendbase charging a share of savings gives the vendor an interest in defining savings generously, and the customer cannot verify a counterfactual price it never saw.
- They diverge on capability: Payhawk covers Corporate cards, Spendbase covers Subscription visibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Payhawk and Spendbase actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Payhawk
- Corporate cards
- Accounts payable automation
- Procurement module
- Travel booking
- ERP integrations
- Multi-entity consolidation
Only in Spendbase
- Subscription visibility
- Discount marketplace
- Virtual cards
- Cashback
- Renewal management
- Savings-share billing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Payhawk
- A multi-entity European business wanting one system for cards, expenses and payables across currenciesnot Spendbase
- A finance team that wants to price spend management before a sales call rather than negotiating blindnot Spendbase
- A company wanting only accounts payable automation without paying for card issuing it does not neednot Spendbase
- A mid-market business standardising ERP-integrated expense reporting ahead of a fundraise or auditnot Spendbase
Spendbase
- A startup with no procurement function that wants renewal dates and subscription owners in one placenot Payhawk
- A company with heavy Azure or cloud spend that can use pre-negotiated credit allocationsnot Payhawk
- Issuing virtual cards per subscription so a forgotten trial cannot renew silentlynot Payhawk
- A finance lead who wants software cost reduction without hiring anyone to do itnot Payhawk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Payhawk
- Buying the full stack of Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Procurement separately costs more than a single suite price, since each module carries its own flat monthly fee.
- The unlimited-seats model is a poor fit for a company issuing cards to only a handful of employees, since the fixed module price does not scale down.
- Card issuing depends on Payhawk's own banking partners rather than a company's existing bank, so switching away later means reissuing cards and re-training staff on a new tool.
- Procurement is a separate paid module rather than a built-in feature, so a company evaluating "Payhawk" from marketing material may be looking at capability it has not actually bought.
- International card acceptance and FX handling vary by market, and companies with material spend outside Europe report gaps compared to global card issuers.
Spendbase
- Charging a share of savings gives the vendor an interest in defining savings generously, and the customer cannot verify a counterfactual price it never saw.
- The savings share is reported at around 25 percent but is not published on the pricing page, so the actual commercial terms only appear in a contract.
- Spendbase is both a banking provider and your software negotiator, so a company using both concentrates operating cash and vendor relationships in one small, young company.
- Banking is delivered through partners rather than held directly, meaning deposit protection and service continuity depend on those partners rather than on Spendbase.
- It is scoped for startups and small companies, so organisations needing approval workflows, purchase orders or ERP integration will find it thin against a real procurement platform.
Pricing, plan by plan
Payhawk
On request- Travel$299/month
- Integrated travel booking
- Unlimited employee seats
- Accounts Payable$349/month
- Invoice capture and approval routing
- Unlimited document processing
- Cards and Expenses$449/month
- Unlimited card transactions
- Multi-entity expense management
- Procurement$499/month
- Purchase request and approval workflow
- Vendor management
Spendbase
Free- Digital bankingFree
- No monthly fee per user
- Up to 100 virtual cards
- EUR and GBP account details
- Spend management$undefined/year
- Everything in the free tier
- Reported share of roughly 25 percent of savings achieved
- 200 percent return guarantee against a deposit
Which should you pick?
Choose Payhawk if
- You need corporate cards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want accounts payable automation.
Choose Spendbase if
- You need subscription visibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want discount marketplace.
Questions people ask
- Is Payhawk or Spendbase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Payhawk starts at On request and Spendbase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Payhawk or Spendbase?
- Spendbase has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Payhawk and Free for Spendbase.
- Does Payhawk or Spendbase run on more platforms?
- Payhawk runs on Web, iOS, Android. Spendbase runs on Web.
- Can I use Spendbase for free?
- Yes. Spendbase has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Payhawk starts at On request.
- What is Payhawk best used for?
- Payhawk is most often used for a multi-entity european business wanting one system for cards, expenses and payables across currencies, a finance team that wants to price spend management before a sales call rather than negotiating blind, a company wanting only accounts payable automation without paying for card issuing it does not need, a mid-market business standardising erp-integrated expense reporting ahead of a fundraise or audit. Of those, a multi-entity european business wanting one system for cards, expenses and payables across currencies and a finance team that wants to price spend management before a sales call rather than negotiating blind are not what Spendbase is typically brought in for.
- What can Payhawk do that Spendbase cannot?
- Payhawk covers Corporate cards, Accounts payable automation, Procurement module, Travel booking. Spendbase covers Subscription visibility, Discount marketplace, Virtual cards, Cashback.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Payhawk: Is Payhawk pricing really public?
Yes, module pricing (Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Expenses, Procurement) is published starting at 299 to 499 dollars a month per module, or bundled as Payhawk Complete.
Spendbase: Is Spendbase free?
The card and banking tier is genuinely free with no per-user fee. The spend management service is paid from a share of the savings it finds, reported at around 25 percent.
Payhawk: Does it charge per seat?
No, each module includes unlimited employee seats; the fixed monthly fee does not increase with headcount.
Spendbase: How is a saving calculated?
The methodology is not published. Agree the baseline, the measurement period and what counts as a saving in writing before signing.
Payhawk: Can we buy just one module?
Yes, modules are sold separately, so a company can buy Accounts Payable without Cards or Procurement.
Spendbase: Does Spendbase hold my money?
Banking is provided through regulated partners including Moorwand in the UK and EEA and Sutton Bank in the US, with Mastercard issuing the cards.
Spendbase: Is it suitable for an enterprise?
No. There are no purchase orders, approval hierarchies or ERP integration; it is built for startups.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Payhawk vs Volopay
- Payhawk vs EnKash
- Payhawk vs Extend
- Payhawk vs Mooncard
- Payhawk vs Openwage
- Payhawk vs Justworks
- Payhawk vs Hastee
- Payhawk vs Immediate
- Payhawk vs SalaryFits
- Payhawk vs Branch App
- Payhawk vs Payactiv
- Payhawk vs Rain Instant Pay
- Payhawk vs UKG Pro
- Payhawk vs Velocity Global
- Payhawk vs Namely
- Payhawk vs Nmbrs
- Payhawk vs Airbase
- Payhawk vs Brex
- Payhawk vs Ramp
- Payhawk vs Spendesk
- Payhawk vs Cledara
- Payhawk vs Mesh Payments
- Payhawk vs Tropic
- Payhawk vs Kodo
- Payhawk vs Soldo
- Payhawk vs Moss
- Payhawk vs Medius
- Payhawk vs Carta
- Payhawk vs Rydoo
- Payhawk vs sevdesk
- Payhawk vs Workiva
- Payhawk vs Xero
- Payhawk vs Yooz
- Spendbase vs Volopay
- Spendbase vs EnKash
- Spendbase vs Extend
- Spendbase vs Mooncard
- Spendbase vs Openwage
- Spendbase vs Justworks
- Spendbase vs Hastee
- Spendbase vs Immediate
- Spendbase vs SalaryFits
- Spendbase vs Branch App
- Spendbase vs Payactiv
- Spendbase vs Rain Instant Pay
- Spendbase vs UKG Pro
- Spendbase vs Velocity Global
- Spendbase vs Namely
- Spendbase vs Nmbrs
- Spendbase vs Airbase
- Spendbase vs Brex
- Spendbase vs Ramp
- Spendbase vs Spendesk
- Spendbase vs Cledara
- Spendbase vs Mesh Payments
- Spendbase vs Tropic
- Spendbase vs Kodo
- Spendbase vs Soldo
- Spendbase vs Moss
- Spendbase vs Medius
- Spendbase vs Carta
- Spendbase vs Rydoo
- Spendbase vs sevdesk
- Spendbase vs Workiva
- Spendbase vs Xero
- Spendbase vs Yooz
