Softwr

Payroll · head to head

Mooncard vs Payhawk

Mooncard logo

Mooncard

Payroll

French corporate card and expense management platform built on the Visa network

From
On request
Rated
-
Payhawk logo

Payhawk

Payroll

Modular spend management combining corporate cards, accounts payable, procurement and travel

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Mooncard pricing is entirely unpublished, so a company cannot budget or benchmark Mooncard against Payhawk or Extend without starting a sales process.; Payhawk buying the full stack of Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Procurement separately costs more than a single suite price, since each module carries its own flat monthly fee.
  • They diverge on capability: Mooncard covers Configurable Visa cards, Payhawk covers Corporate cards.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Mooncard and Payhawk actually diverge.

Attributes where Mooncard and Payhawk differ
AttributeMooncardPayhawk
Pricing modelquotePer module per month

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Payroll).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Mooncard

  • Configurable Visa cards
  • Automated expense capture
  • Multi-entity premium tier
  • Accounting export
  • Flying Blue miles
  • Real-time spend visibility

Only in Payhawk

  • Corporate cards
  • Accounts payable automation
  • Procurement module
  • Travel booking
  • ERP integrations
  • Multi-entity consolidation

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Mooncard

  • A French business replacing an Amex corporate card programme with wider Visa merchant acceptancenot Payhawk
  • A finance team automating VAT-compliant receipt capture instead of manual expense reportsnot Payhawk
  • A group with several legal entities wanting consolidated card and expense visibilitynot Payhawk
  • A company whose travellers want Flying Blue miles on corporate card spendnot Payhawk

Payhawk

  • A multi-entity European business wanting one system for cards, expenses and payables across currenciesnot Mooncard
  • A finance team that wants to price spend management before a sales call rather than negotiating blindnot Mooncard
  • A company wanting only accounts payable automation without paying for card issuing it does not neednot Mooncard
  • A mid-market business standardising ERP-integrated expense reporting ahead of a fundraise or auditnot Mooncard

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Mooncard

  • Pricing is entirely unpublished, so a company cannot budget or benchmark Mooncard against Payhawk or Extend without starting a sales process.
  • Its strongest support, integrations and merchant relationships are concentrated in France, and companies with most spend outside France or Europe get a thinner experience.
  • Being built specifically to displace Amex corporate cards, it has less of a track record and feature depth outside the expense and card niche compared with broader spend platforms like Payhawk.
  • Group and multi-entity functionality sits behind a separate premium tier, so a growing company may need to renegotiate its plan as it adds entities.
  • Marketing-driven positioning, including stunts such as the stratospheric payment demo, does not substitute for third-party benchmarking of actual transaction reliability at scale.

Payhawk

  • Buying the full stack of Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Procurement separately costs more than a single suite price, since each module carries its own flat monthly fee.
  • The unlimited-seats model is a poor fit for a company issuing cards to only a handful of employees, since the fixed module price does not scale down.
  • Card issuing depends on Payhawk's own banking partners rather than a company's existing bank, so switching away later means reissuing cards and re-training staff on a new tool.
  • Procurement is a separate paid module rather than a built-in feature, so a company evaluating "Payhawk" from marketing material may be looking at capability it has not actually bought.
  • International card acceptance and FX handling vary by market, and companies with material spend outside Europe report gaps compared to global card issuers.

Pricing, plan by plan

Mooncard

On request
  • Mooncard$undefined/month
    • Original offer with cards and expense management software
    • Premium tier for groups and multi-entity structures
    • Custom quote required, no published rate card

Payhawk

On request
  • Travel$299/month
    • Integrated travel booking
    • Unlimited employee seats
  • Accounts Payable$349/month
    • Invoice capture and approval routing
    • Unlimited document processing
  • Cards and Expenses$449/month
    • Unlimited card transactions
    • Multi-entity expense management
  • Procurement$499/month
    • Purchase request and approval workflow
    • Vendor management

Which should you pick?

Choose Mooncard if

  • You need configurable visa cards.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want automated expense capture.

Choose Payhawk if

  • You need corporate cards.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want accounts payable automation.

Questions people ask

Is Mooncard or Payhawk better?
Neither clearly leads. Mooncard starts at On request and Payhawk at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Mooncard or Payhawk?
Mooncard starts at On request and Payhawk at On request.
Does Mooncard or Payhawk run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Mooncard best used for?
Mooncard is most often used for a french business replacing an amex corporate card programme with wider visa merchant acceptance, a finance team automating vat-compliant receipt capture instead of manual expense reports, a group with several legal entities wanting consolidated card and expense visibility, a company whose travellers want flying blue miles on corporate card spend. Of those, a french business replacing an amex corporate card programme with wider visa merchant acceptance and a finance team automating vat-compliant receipt capture instead of manual expense reports are not what Payhawk is typically brought in for.
What can Mooncard do that Payhawk cannot?
Mooncard covers Configurable Visa cards, Automated expense capture, Multi-entity premium tier, Accounting export. Payhawk covers Corporate cards, Accounts payable automation, Procurement module, Travel booking.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Mooncard: Is Mooncard only for France?

No, but its content, support and market presence are strongest in France; other European markets are served but less deeply.

Payhawk: Is Payhawk pricing really public?

Yes, module pricing (Travel, Accounts Payable, Cards and Expenses, Procurement) is published starting at 299 to 499 dollars a month per module, or bundled as Payhawk Complete.

Mooncard: Does Mooncard publish pricing?

No, quotes are provided directly by the Mooncard sales team based on company size and needs.

Payhawk: Does it charge per seat?

No, each module includes unlimited employee seats; the fixed monthly fee does not increase with headcount.

Mooncard: Which card network does it use?

Visa, which the company positions as giving broader merchant acceptance than the Amex network used by many incumbent French corporate cards.

Payhawk: Can we buy just one module?

Yes, modules are sold separately, so a company can buy Accounts Payable without Cards or Procurement.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads