APIs · head to head
Paw vs Trustly

Paw
APIs
Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing
- From
- $99/one-time
- Rated
- -

Trustly
APIs
Pay-by-bank payments network, majority-owned by private equity firm Nordic Capital
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Paw no specific pricing amounts published for subscription tiers; Trustly it is majority-owned by Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, so its long-term roadmap is ultimately oriented toward an eventual sale or IPO rather than indefinite independent operation.
- They diverge on capability: Paw covers REST Client, Trustly covers Pay by bank checkout.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Paw and Trustly actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Paw
- REST Client
- Scripting
- Dynamic Values
- Slack
- GitHub
- Custom extensions
- MacOS support
Only in Trustly
- Pay by bank checkout
- Instant refunds
- Verified payouts
- Multi-market bank connectivity
- Merchant dashboard and reconciliation
- Fraud and risk tooling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Paw
- API Developmentnot Trustly
- API Gatewaynot Trustly
- API Testingnot Trustly
- API Documentationnot Trustly
- Microservicesnot Trustly
Trustly
- An e-commerce merchant wanting a lower-cost alternative or complement to card payment acceptancenot Paw
- A gaming or gambling operator needing verified, instant payouts to players' bank accountsnot Paw
- A merchant wanting instant refunds processed directly to a customer's bank account rather than card reversal delaysnot Paw
- A business in a market with strong open banking adoption wanting pay-by-bank as a checkout optionnot Paw
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Paw
- No specific pricing amounts published for subscription tiers
- Individual and volume licensing requires direct contact
- Limited details on team subscription pricing
Trustly
- It is majority-owned by Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, so its long-term roadmap is ultimately oriented toward an eventual sale or IPO rather than indefinite independent operation.
- Consumer familiarity with paying by bank transfer still lags card payments in most markets, so merchants typically see it used as a secondary option rather than a full card replacement.
- The 1.15 to 3.15% merchant fee range is not a single published rate, so a merchant cannot know its actual cost without a sales negotiation.
- As with all open banking-dependent payment methods, reliability depends on the consistency of the underlying banks' own APIs, which Trustly does not control.
- Its verified payout functionality is heavily used in gaming and gambling, a sector with additional regulatory scrutiny, which is worth factoring in when evaluating vendor risk exposure by association.
Pricing, plan by plan
Paw
$99/one-time- Standard$99/one-time
- Full REST client
- Advanced scripting
- Extensions
- Annual License$49/yearly
- All features
- Updates
- Priority support
Trustly
On request- Trustly$undefined/month
- Typical merchant cost of 1.15% to 3.15% depending on volume and market
- Exact rate negotiated per merchant, not published as a flat card
Which should you pick?
Choose Trustly if
- You need pay by bank checkout.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want instant refunds.
Questions people ask
- Is Paw or Trustly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Paw starts at $99/one-time and Trustly at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Paw or Trustly?
- Paw starts at $99/one-time and Trustly at On request.
- Does Paw or Trustly run on more platforms?
- Paw runs on MacOS. Trustly runs on Web, API.
- What is Paw best used for?
- Paw is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Trustly is typically brought in for.
- What can Paw do that Trustly cannot?
- Paw covers REST Client, Scripting, Dynamic Values, Slack. Trustly covers Pay by bank checkout, Instant refunds, Verified payouts, Multi-market bank connectivity.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Paw: How much does RapidAPI for Mac (Paw) cost?
Paw offers a free tier for personal and professional use. Paid subscription plans are available on monthly and yearly billing, but specific pricing amounts are not disclosed and require direct contact with RapidAPI.
SourceTrustly: Who owns Trustly?
Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, holds a 51.1% majority stake; Alfven & Didrikson and BlackRock hold smaller stakes.
Paw: Is there a free version of Paw?
Yes, RapidAPI for Mac (Paw) is free for both personal and professional use.
SourceTrustly: Is Trustly going public?
It has discussed an IPO but as of its most recent comments said one remained at least a year away.
Paw: What features are included in the free version of Paw?
The free tier includes HTTP client capabilities for API testing, API documentation, personal sync across devices, and support for Swagger, RAML, and API Blueprint formats.
SourceTrustly: What does it typically cost a merchant?
Roughly 1.15% to 3.15% of transaction value depending on volume and market, negotiated per merchant.
Paw: What additional features do Paw team subscriptions include?
Team subscription plans include all personal features plus collaborative tools, team project access, synchronized workflows with safe data merges, and real-time notifications and updates.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Paw vs Appwrite
- Paw vs Sanity
- Paw vs PocketBase
- Paw vs Apidog
- Paw vs Hasura
- Paw vs REST Client VSCode
- Paw vs Thunder Client
- Paw vs Hoppscotch
- Paw vs HTTPie
- Paw vs Griffin
- Paw vs KeystoneJS
- Paw vs Basis Theory
- Paw vs Astra
- Paw vs Asyncapi
- Paw vs AWS API Gateway
- Paw vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Paw vs Yapily
- Paw vs Aiia
- Paw vs Swan
- Paw vs Volt
- Paw vs TrueLayer
- Paw vs Token.io
- Paw vs Tink
- Paw vs Brite Payments
- Paw vs Dwolla
- Paw vs Zimpler
- Paw vs Salt Edge
- Paw vs Yodlee
- Paw vs Stainless
- Paw vs Strapi
- Paw vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Paw vs Thredd
- Paw vs Toqio
- Trustly vs Appwrite
- Trustly vs Sanity
- Trustly vs PocketBase
- Trustly vs Apidog
- Trustly vs Hasura
- Trustly vs REST Client VSCode
- Trustly vs Thunder Client
- Trustly vs Hoppscotch
- Trustly vs HTTPie
- Trustly vs Griffin
- Trustly vs KeystoneJS
- Trustly vs Basis Theory
- Trustly vs Astra
- Trustly vs Asyncapi
- Trustly vs AWS API Gateway
- Trustly vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Trustly vs Yapily
- Trustly vs Aiia
- Trustly vs Swan
- Trustly vs Volt
- Trustly vs TrueLayer
- Trustly vs Token.io
- Trustly vs Tink
- Trustly vs Brite Payments
- Trustly vs Dwolla
- Trustly vs Zimpler
- Trustly vs Salt Edge
- Trustly vs Yodlee
- Trustly vs Stainless
- Trustly vs Strapi
- Trustly vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Trustly vs Thredd
- Trustly vs Toqio
