Softwr

Software · head to head

Paw vs Thunder Client

Paw logo

Paw

Software

Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing

From
$99/one-time
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Thunder Client logo

Thunder Client

Software

Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Thunder Client has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Paw now distributed as RapidAPI for Mac; the vendor's own page states it is "exclusively built for macOS" and requires macOS 10.15+, with no Windows or Linux client; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
  • They diverge on capability: Paw covers Scripting, Thunder Client covers Environment variables.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Paw and Thunder Client actually diverge.

Attributes where Paw and Thunder Client differ
AttributePawThunder Client
Starting price$99/one-timeFree
Pricing modelsubscriptionfreemium
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsMacOSVSCode extension, Web
Founded20132021

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Paw

  • Scripting
  • Dynamic Values
  • Slack
  • Custom extensions
  • MacOS support

Only in Thunder Client

  • Environment variables
  • Response testing
  • VSCode
  • Webhook support
  • VSCode extension support
  • Web support

Both cover

  • REST Client
  • GitHub

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Paw

  • API Development
  • API Gateway
  • API Testing
  • API Documentation
  • Microservices

Thunder Client

  • API Development
  • API Gateway
  • API Testing
  • API Documentation
  • Microservices

Both are used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation, microservices, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Paw

  • Now distributed as RapidAPI for Mac; the vendor's own page states it is "exclusively built for macOS" and requires macOS 10.15+, with no Windows or Linux client

Thunder Client

  • Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs

Pricing, plan by plan

Paw

$99/one-time
  • Standard$99/one-time
    • Full REST client
    • Advanced scripting
    • Extensions
  • Annual License$49/yearly
    • All features
    • Updates
    • Priority support

Thunder Client

Free
  • FreeFree
    • REST client
    • Collection management
    • Local testing
  • Pro$8/monthly
    • Cloud sync
    • Team collaboration
    • Advanced features

Which should you pick?

Choose Paw if

  • You need scripting.
  • You work on MacOS.
  • You also want dynamic values.
Paw review

Choose Thunder Client if

  • You need environment variables.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on VSCode extension, Web.
  • You also want response testing.
Thunder Client review

Questions people ask

Is Paw or Thunder Client better?
Neither clearly leads. Paw starts at $99/one-time and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Paw or Thunder Client?
Thunder Client has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $99/one-time for Paw and Free for Thunder Client.
Does Paw or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
Paw runs on MacOS. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
Can I use Thunder Client for free?
Yes. Thunder Client has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paw starts at $99/one-time.
What is Paw best used for?
Paw is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation.
What can Paw do that Thunder Client cannot?
Paw covers Scripting, Dynamic Values, Slack, Custom extensions. Thunder Client covers Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode, Webhook support. Both handle REST Client, GitHub.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Paw

More on Thunder Client

Keep looking

Other head to heads