APIs · head to head
Aiia vs Paw

Aiia
APIs
Open banking and open finance API platform, now operating as Mastercard Open Banking
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Paw
APIs
Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing
- From
- $99/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aiia it is now part of Mastercard rather than an independent company, so a business specifically wanting to avoid card network dependency in its banking infrastructure no longer gets that separation by choosing Aiia.; Paw no specific pricing amounts published for subscription tiers
- They diverge on capability: Aiia covers Bank account data access, Paw covers REST Client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aiia and Paw actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aiia
- Bank account data access
- Payment initiation
- Mastercard Open Finance integration
- Modern authentication support
- Multi-country coverage
- Developer documentation and sandbox
Only in Paw
- REST Client
- Scripting
- Dynamic Values
- Slack
- GitHub
- Custom extensions
- MacOS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aiia
- A lending or credit product needing affordability checks via European bank account datanot Paw
- A personal finance or accounting product needing transaction history across Nordic and European banksnot Paw
- A payments product wanting account-to-account payment initiation under open banking regulationnot Paw
- A business wanting the stability and continued investment of Mastercard ownership behind its banking connectivity providernot Paw
Paw
- API Developmentnot Aiia
- API Gatewaynot Aiia
- API Testingnot Aiia
- API Documentationnot Aiia
- Microservicesnot Aiia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aiia
- It is now part of Mastercard rather than an independent company, so a business specifically wanting to avoid card network dependency in its banking infrastructure no longer gets that separation by choosing Aiia.
- Pricing is not published and requires engaging Mastercard's open finance sales process, which can be a heavier sales motion than dealing with a smaller independent open banking provider.
- Its strongest bank coverage remains concentrated in the Nordics and Northern Europe, so companies needing dense coverage in Southern or Eastern Europe should verify current bank connectivity before committing.
- Brand confusion is real: developer documentation, login portals and older case studies still reference "Aiia" while newer Mastercard material refers to "Mastercard Open Banking," and a company researching either name in isolation may miss half the relevant material.
- As with any open banking platform, reliability still depends on the consistency of the underlying banks' own APIs, which is a systemic industry issue rather than something Aiia specifically controls.
Paw
- No specific pricing amounts published for subscription tiers
- Individual and volume licensing requires direct contact
- Limited details on team subscription pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
Aiia
On request- Aiia Enterprise (Mastercard Open Banking)$undefined/year
- Pricing not published, quote via Mastercard Open Finance sales
Paw
$99/one-time- Standard$99/one-time
- Full REST client
- Advanced scripting
- Extensions
- Annual License$49/yearly
- All features
- Updates
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Aiia if
- You need bank account data access.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want payment initiation.
Questions people ask
- Is Aiia or Paw better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aiia starts at On request and Paw at $99/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aiia or Paw?
- Aiia starts at On request and Paw at $99/one-time.
- Does Aiia or Paw run on more platforms?
- Aiia runs on Web, API. Paw runs on MacOS.
- What is Aiia best used for?
- Aiia is most often used for a lending or credit product needing affordability checks via european bank account data, a personal finance or accounting product needing transaction history across nordic and european banks, a payments product wanting account-to-account payment initiation under open banking regulation, a business wanting the stability and continued investment of mastercard ownership behind its banking connectivity provider. Of those, a lending or credit product needing affordability checks via european bank account data and a personal finance or accounting product needing transaction history across nordic and european banks are not what Paw is typically brought in for.
- What can Aiia do that Paw cannot?
- Aiia covers Bank account data access, Payment initiation, Mastercard Open Finance integration, Modern authentication support. Paw covers REST Client, Scripting, Dynamic Values, Slack.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aiia: Is Aiia still an independent company?
No, it was acquired by Mastercard in 2021 and now operates as part of Mastercard Open Finance Solutions, referenced as Aiia Enterprise.
Paw: How much does RapidAPI for Mac (Paw) cost?
Paw offers a free tier for personal and professional use. Paid subscription plans are available on monthly and yearly billing, but specific pricing amounts are not disclosed and require direct contact with RapidAPI.
SourceAiia: Does the Aiia brand still exist?
Yes, in developer documentation and login portals, but the company behind it is Mastercard.
Paw: Is there a free version of Paw?
Yes, RapidAPI for Mac (Paw) is free for both personal and professional use.
SourceAiia: Which banks does it cover?
Around 3,000 European banks, with strongest coverage in the Nordics and Northern Europe.
Paw: What features are included in the free version of Paw?
The free tier includes HTTP client capabilities for API testing, API documentation, personal sync across devices, and support for Swagger, RAML, and API Blueprint formats.
SourcePaw: What additional features do Paw team subscriptions include?
Team subscription plans include all personal features plus collaborative tools, team project access, synchronized workflows with safe data merges, and real-time notifications and updates.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aiia vs Yapily
- Aiia vs Trustly
- Aiia vs Akoya
- Aiia vs Neonomics
- Aiia vs Tink
- Aiia vs Salt Edge
- Aiia vs Token.io
- Aiia vs Bud Financial
- Aiia vs Enable Banking
- Aiia vs Method Financial
- Aiia vs TrueLayer
- Aiia vs Yodlee
- Aiia vs Thredd
- Aiia vs Thunder Client
- Aiia vs Toqio
- Aiia vs Tyk
- Aiia vs Volt
- Aiia vs WSO2 API Manager
- Aiia vs Appwrite
- Aiia vs Sanity
- Aiia vs PocketBase
- Aiia vs Apidog
- Aiia vs Hasura
- Aiia vs REST Client VSCode
- Aiia vs Hoppscotch
- Aiia vs HTTPie
- Aiia vs Griffin
- Aiia vs KeystoneJS
- Aiia vs Basis Theory
- Aiia vs Astra
- Aiia vs Asyncapi
- Aiia vs AWS API Gateway
- Aiia vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Paw vs Yapily
- Paw vs Trustly
- Paw vs Akoya
- Paw vs Neonomics
- Paw vs Tink
- Paw vs Salt Edge
- Paw vs Token.io
- Paw vs Bud Financial
- Paw vs Enable Banking
- Paw vs Method Financial
- Paw vs TrueLayer
- Paw vs Yodlee
- Paw vs Thredd
- Paw vs Thunder Client
- Paw vs Toqio
- Paw vs Tyk
- Paw vs Volt
- Paw vs WSO2 API Manager
- Paw vs Appwrite
- Paw vs Sanity
- Paw vs PocketBase
- Paw vs Apidog
- Paw vs Hasura
- Paw vs REST Client VSCode
- Paw vs Hoppscotch
- Paw vs HTTPie
- Paw vs Griffin
- Paw vs KeystoneJS
- Paw vs Basis Theory
- Paw vs Astra
- Paw vs Asyncapi
- Paw vs AWS API Gateway
- Paw vs Microsoft Azure API Management
