Softwr

Software · head to head

Hasura vs Paw

Hasura logo

Hasura

Software

GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases

From
Free
Rated
-
Paw logo

Paw

Software

Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing

From
$99/one-time
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Hasura has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Hasura database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only; Paw now distributed as RapidAPI for Mac; the vendor's own page states it is "exclusively built for macOS" and requires macOS 10.15+, with no Windows or Linux client
  • They diverge on capability: Hasura covers GraphQL API, Paw covers REST Client.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Hasura and Paw actually diverge.

Attributes where Hasura and Paw differ
AttributeHasuraPaw
Starting priceFree$99/one-time
Pricing modelopen-sourcesubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWebMacOS
Founded20172013

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Hasura

  • GraphQL API
  • Real-time subscriptions
  • Access control
  • PostgreSQL
  • MySQL
  • Webhooks
  • REST APIs
  • Cloud support

Only in Paw

  • REST Client
  • Scripting
  • Dynamic Values
  • Slack
  • GitHub
  • Custom extensions
  • MacOS support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Hasura

  • Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot Paw
  • Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot Paw
  • Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot Paw
  • Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot Paw

Paw

  • API Developmentnot Hasura
  • API Gatewaynot Hasura
  • API Testingnot Hasura
  • API Documentationnot Hasura
  • Microservicesnot Hasura

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Hasura

  • Database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only

Paw

  • Now distributed as RapidAPI for Mac; the vendor's own page states it is "exclusively built for macOS" and requires macOS 10.15+, with no Windows or Linux client

Pricing, plan by plan

Hasura

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Hasura review.

Paw

$99/one-time
  • Standard$99/one-time
    • Full REST client
    • Advanced scripting
    • Extensions
  • Annual License$49/yearly
    • All features
    • Updates
    • Priority support

Which should you pick?

Choose Hasura if

  • You need graphql api.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want real-time subscriptions.

Choose Paw if

  • You need rest client.
  • You work on MacOS.
  • You also want scripting.

Questions people ask

Is Hasura or Paw better?
Neither clearly leads. Hasura starts at Free and Paw at $99/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Hasura or Paw?
Hasura has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Hasura and $99/one-time for Paw.
Does Hasura or Paw run on more platforms?
Hasura runs on Web. Paw runs on MacOS.
Can I use Hasura for free?
Yes. Hasura has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paw starts at $99/one-time.
What is Hasura best used for?
Hasura is most often used for automatic graphql api generation from existing databases, real-time data subscriptions for modern applications, backend infrastructure for web and mobile applications, event-triggered webhooks for database changes. Of those, automatic graphql api generation from existing databases and real-time data subscriptions for modern applications are not what Paw is typically brought in for.
What can Hasura do that Paw cannot?
Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL. Paw covers REST Client, Scripting, Dynamic Values, Slack.

Related pages

Other head to heads