Software · head to head
Hasura vs Paw

Hasura
Software
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Paw
Software
Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing
- From
- $99/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Hasura has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Hasura database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only; Paw now distributed as RapidAPI for Mac; the vendor's own page states it is "exclusively built for macOS" and requires macOS 10.15+, with no Windows or Linux client
- They diverge on capability: Hasura covers GraphQL API, Paw covers REST Client.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hasura and Paw actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Webhooks
- REST APIs
- Cloud support
Only in Paw
- REST Client
- Scripting
- Dynamic Values
- Slack
- GitHub
- Custom extensions
- MacOS support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot Paw
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot Paw
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot Paw
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot Paw
Paw
- API Developmentnot Hasura
- API Gatewaynot Hasura
- API Testingnot Hasura
- API Documentationnot Hasura
- Microservicesnot Hasura
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hasura
- Database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
Paw
- Now distributed as RapidAPI for Mac; the vendor's own page states it is "exclusively built for macOS" and requires macOS 10.15+, with no Windows or Linux client
Pricing, plan by plan
Hasura
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Hasura review.
Paw
$99/one-time- Standard$99/one-time
- Full REST client
- Advanced scripting
- Extensions
- Annual License$49/yearly
- All features
- Updates
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Questions people ask
- Is Hasura or Paw better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hasura starts at Free and Paw at $99/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hasura or Paw?
- Hasura has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Hasura and $99/one-time for Paw.
- Does Hasura or Paw run on more platforms?
- Hasura runs on Web. Paw runs on MacOS.
- Can I use Hasura for free?
- Yes. Hasura has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paw starts at $99/one-time.
- What is Hasura best used for?
- Hasura is most often used for automatic graphql api generation from existing databases, real-time data subscriptions for modern applications, backend infrastructure for web and mobile applications, event-triggered webhooks for database changes. Of those, automatic graphql api generation from existing databases and real-time data subscriptions for modern applications are not what Paw is typically brought in for.
- What can Hasura do that Paw cannot?
- Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL. Paw covers REST Client, Scripting, Dynamic Values, Slack.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs PocketBase
- Hasura vs Sanity
- Hasura vs Apigee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Hasura vs Thunder Client
- Hasura vs WSO2 API Manager
- Hasura vs 3scale
- Hasura vs Akana
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs AWS API Gateway
- Hasura vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Hasura vs Backendless
- Paw vs Appwrite
- Paw vs PocketBase
- Paw vs Sanity
- Paw vs Apigee
- Paw vs Bruno
- Paw vs KeystoneJS
- Paw vs Parse Server
- Paw vs Stoplight
- Paw vs Strapi
- Paw vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Paw vs Thunder Client
- Paw vs WSO2 API Manager
- Paw vs 3scale
- Paw vs Akana
- Paw vs Asyncapi
- Paw vs AWS API Gateway
- Paw vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Paw vs Backendless
