Cybersecurity · head to head
Passbolt vs Refact

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- They diverge on capability: Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Passbolt and Refact actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot Refact
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot Refact
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot Refact
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Passbolt
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Passbolt
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Passbolt
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Passbolt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is Passbolt or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Passbolt starts at Free and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Passbolt or Refact?
- Passbolt starts at Free and Refact at Free.
- Does Passbolt or Refact run on more platforms?
- Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use Passbolt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Passbolt best used for?
- Passbolt is most often used for self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereignty, provisioning vault access from an existing ldap/ad directory, sharing credentials across engineering or it teams via folders and groups, automating credential retrieval through the cli or open api. Of those, self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereignty and provisioning vault access from an existing ldap/ad directory are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can Passbolt do that Refact cannot?
- Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Passbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourcePassbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourcePassbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs GitHub Copilot
- Passbolt vs Swagger UI
- Passbolt vs Sweep
- Passbolt vs Coder
- Passbolt vs Pieces for Developers
- Passbolt vs CodeSandbox
- Passbolt vs GNU Emacs
- Passbolt vs Moonrepo
- Passbolt vs Pants Build
- Passbolt vs Atlantis
- Passbolt vs Backstage
- Passbolt vs Visual Studio Code
- Passbolt vs Garden
- Passbolt vs GitLab CI/CD
- Passbolt vs HCP Terraform
- Passbolt vs Helm
- Passbolt vs Jitsu
- Passbolt vs Notepad++
- Refact vs Bitwarden
- Refact vs LastPass
- Refact vs authentik
- Refact vs 1Password
- Refact vs Authelia
- Refact vs Enpass
- Refact vs HashiCorp Vault
- Refact vs Infisical
- Refact vs Norton 360
- Refact vs Semgrep
- Refact vs Trivy
- Refact vs Chainguard
- Refact vs Trulioo
- Refact vs Unit21
- Refact vs Veracode
- Refact vs Very Good Security
- Refact vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Refact vs Windscribe
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs Garden
- Refact vs GitLab CI/CD
- Refact vs HCP Terraform
- Refact vs Helm
- Refact vs Jitsu
- Refact vs Notepad++
