Developer Tools · head to head
Refact vs Veracode

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Veracode
Cybersecurity
Application risk management platform for finding and fixing software vulnerabilities.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Refact has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Refact requires configuration for optimal performance; Veracode no public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- They diverge on capability: Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST).
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Refact and Veracode actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
Only in Veracode
- Static analysis (SAST)
- Dynamic analysis (DAST)
- Software composition analysis
- AI-driven code remediation
- Container security
- Risk Manager (ASPM)
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Veracode
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Veracode
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Veracode
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Veracode
Veracode
- Scanning applications for vulnerabilities across the SDLCnot Refact
- Automating remediation of flagged security flaws with AInot Refact
- Securing containerized workloads before deploymentnot Refact
- Running penetration tests as a managed servicenot Refact
- Enforcing security policy governance across many applicationsnot Refact
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Veracode
- No public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- Full platform capability spans many modules, which can require significant onboarding.
- Package Firewall and PTaaS are separate add-ons rather than included by default.
- Primarily built for enterprise scale, less suited to small individual projects.
Pricing, plan by plan
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Veracode
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Veracode review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Choose Veracode if
- You need static analysis (sast).
- You work on web, api.
- You also want dynamic analysis (dast).
Questions people ask
- Is Refact or Veracode better?
- Neither clearly leads. Refact starts at Free and Veracode at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Refact or Veracode?
- Refact has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Refact and On request for Veracode.
- Does Refact or Veracode run on more platforms?
- Refact runs on VS Code, Web. Veracode runs on web, api.
- Can I use Refact for free?
- Yes. Refact has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Veracode starts at On request.
- What is Refact best used for?
- Refact is most often used for autonomous code generation for development tasks, end-to-end bug fixes and refactoring, multi-language software development acceleration, enterprise development with data privacy requirements. Of those, autonomous code generation for development tasks and end-to-end bug fixes and refactoring are not what Veracode is typically brought in for.
- What can Refact do that Veracode cannot?
- Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration. Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST), Dynamic analysis (DAST), Software composition analysis, AI-driven code remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Refact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceVeracode: How does Veracode pricing work?
Veracode does not publish pricing on their website. Organizations must request a personalized demo or contact sales to receive quotes tailored to their specific needs and usage volume.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceVeracode: Does Veracode offer a free trial or free version?
No information about free trials or free versions is provided on Veracode's public website. Organizations must contact sales to discuss trial options.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Deep Code
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs JetBrains Rider
- Refact vs Spacelift
- Refact vs Argo CD
- Refact vs Blacksmith
- Refact vs Semgrep
- Refact vs Legit Security
- Refact vs Aikido
- Refact vs Snyk
- Refact vs Endor Labs
- Refact vs Tenable
- Refact vs Acunetix
- Refact vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Refact vs Recorded Future
- Refact vs Tanium
- Refact vs Trivy
- Refact vs Grype
- Refact vs Quantexa
- Refact vs Termly
- Refact vs Transcend
- Refact vs WireGuard
- Refact vs Akeyless
- Refact vs DataGrail
- Veracode vs GitHub Copilot
- Veracode vs Swagger UI
- Veracode vs Sweep
- Veracode vs Coder
- Veracode vs Deep Code
- Veracode vs Pieces for Developers
- Veracode vs CodeSandbox
- Veracode vs GNU Emacs
- Veracode vs Moonrepo
- Veracode vs Pants Build
- Veracode vs Atlantis
- Veracode vs Backstage
- Veracode vs JetBrains Rider
- Veracode vs Spacelift
- Veracode vs Argo CD
- Veracode vs Blacksmith
- Veracode vs Semgrep
- Veracode vs Legit Security
- Veracode vs Aikido
- Veracode vs Snyk
- Veracode vs Endor Labs
- Veracode vs Tenable
- Veracode vs Acunetix
- Veracode vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Veracode vs Recorded Future
- Veracode vs Tanium
- Veracode vs Trivy
- Veracode vs Grype
- Veracode vs Quantexa
- Veracode vs Termly
- Veracode vs Transcend
- Veracode vs WireGuard
- Veracode vs Akeyless
- Veracode vs DataGrail
