Manufacturing · head to head
Paperless Parts vs PROGNOST Systems

Paperless Parts
Manufacturing
Quoting and estimating software for job shops, with geometry analysis and ITAR-aware handling
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

PROGNOST Systems
Manufacturing
SIL 3 rated online monitoring and diagnostics for reciprocating compressors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Paperless Parts no pricing is published at any tier, and the mandatory implementation and data migration are quoted on top of the subscription, so the first-year cost is materially higher than the recurring one.; PROGNOST Systems nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- They diverge on capability: Paperless Parts covers Geometry analysis, PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Paperless Parts and PROGNOST Systems actually diverge.
| Attribute | Paperless Parts | PROGNOST Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Windows, On-premise |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Paperless Parts
- Geometry analysis
- Costing rules
- Customer portal
- Quote revisions
- ITAR-aware handling
- ERP hand-off
Only in PROGNOST Systems
- Segmented vibration analysis
- Dynamic rod position
- Online pV diagram
- Dynamic rod load
- SIL 3 machine protection
- Damage pattern library
- PROGNOST-Predictor
- Remote expert service
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Paperless Parts
- A CNC machine shop losing RFQs because quotes take three days to return by emailnot PROGNOST Systems
- A defence supplier that must process controlled RFQ files without exposing them to a generic cloud toolnot PROGNOST Systems
- A fabricator standardising estimating so quotes do not vary by which estimator picked them upnot PROGNOST Systems
- A contract manufacturer giving customers a portal to submit parts and receive prices themselvesnot PROGNOST Systems
PROGNOST Systems
- A refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring systemnot Paperless Parts
- Replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one SIL 3 rated installationnot Paperless Parts
- Gas transmission stations needing valve and rider ring wear diagnosis without opening the machinenot Paperless Parts
- A plant moving reciprocating compressors from time-based overhaul to condition-based intervals with evidence a regulator will acceptnot Paperless Parts
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Paperless Parts
- No pricing is published at any tier, and the mandatory implementation and data migration are quoted on top of the subscription, so the first-year cost is materially higher than the recurring one.
- The quality of automated quotes depends on costing rules the shop must write, which takes an experienced estimator out of production for weeks before the system is useful.
- ERP and shop system integration is gated to higher tiers, so a small shop on the entry plan is still retyping won quotes into its job system.
- Geometry analysis handles prismatic machined and sheet metal parts well but struggles with complex organic surfaces, weldments and assemblies, which still need manual estimating.
- Once costing logic and quote history live in the platform, moving to another system means rebuilding the rules from scratch, which is a strong practical lock-in beyond the contract term.
PROGNOST Systems
- Nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- Installation requires proximity probes, rod position sensors and pressure instrumentation on the machine, which usually means a planned outage and mechanical work before any data exists.
- The value is concentrated in reciprocating compressors; for general rotating equipment across a whole plant it is a far more expensive route than a broad vibration programme.
- SIL 3 certification brings the configuration into functional safety scope, so changes to thresholds and logic go through management of change rather than being adjusted by a reliability engineer.
- The company is small and German-based, so response times and spares logistics for remote sites depend on a partner network rather than a global direct service organisation.
Pricing, plan by plan
Paperless Parts
On request- Basic$undefined/year
- Quoting and geometry analysis
- Customer portal
- For small job shops and contract manufacturers
- Pro$undefined/year
- Integrations with ERP and shop systems
- Deeper costing configuration
- For mid-sized manufacturers
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Controlled data handling for defence and aerospace
- Multi-site and multi-process support
- Priority support and dedicated onboarding
PROGNOST Systems
On request- PROGNOST-NT$undefined/year
- Priced per machine train as an instrumented system
- Sensors, proximity probes, rod position and pressure instrumentation included in scope
- Installation typically requires a machine outage for probe fitting
Which should you pick?
Choose Paperless Parts if
- You need geometry analysis.
- You also want costing rules.
Choose PROGNOST Systems if
- You need segmented vibration analysis.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want dynamic rod position.
Questions people ask
- Is Paperless Parts or PROGNOST Systems better?
- Neither clearly leads. Paperless Parts starts at On request and PROGNOST Systems at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Paperless Parts or PROGNOST Systems?
- Paperless Parts starts at On request and PROGNOST Systems at On request.
- Does Paperless Parts or PROGNOST Systems run on more platforms?
- Paperless Parts runs on Web. PROGNOST Systems runs on Windows, On-premise.
- What is Paperless Parts best used for?
- Paperless Parts is most often used for a cnc machine shop losing rfqs because quotes take three days to return by email, a defence supplier that must process controlled rfq files without exposing them to a generic cloud tool, a fabricator standardising estimating so quotes do not vary by which estimator picked them up, a contract manufacturer giving customers a portal to submit parts and receive prices themselves. Of those, a cnc machine shop losing rfqs because quotes take three days to return by email and a defence supplier that must process controlled rfq files without exposing them to a generic cloud tool are not what PROGNOST Systems is typically brought in for.
- What can Paperless Parts do that PROGNOST Systems cannot?
- Paperless Parts covers Geometry analysis, Costing rules, Customer portal, Quote revisions. PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis, Dynamic rod position, Online pV diagram, Dynamic rod load.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Paperless Parts: How much does Paperless Parts cost?
It does not publish pricing. Expect a tiered annual subscription plus a separately quoted implementation and data migration.
PROGNOST Systems: Does it replace the compressor protection system?
It can. PROGNOST-NT is SIL 3 rated for machine protection, which is the main reason sites choose it over advisory-only monitoring.
Paperless Parts: Does it quote automatically without setup?
No. It applies your costing rules to analysed geometry, and those rules have to be built with your estimator during implementation.
PROGNOST Systems: Can it be retrofitted to an existing compressor?
Yes, but fitting rod position and internal instrumentation generally needs a machine outage.
Paperless Parts: Can it handle ITAR-controlled RFQs?
It markets controlled data handling for defence and aerospace work, which is a main reason regulated shops choose it over generic quoting tools.
PROGNOST Systems: Does it work on centrifugal machines?
PROGNOST offers products for general rotating equipment, but the differentiated diagnostics are for reciprocating compressors.
Paperless Parts: Will it integrate with my shop ERP?
Integrations exist but are gated to the higher tiers, so confirm your ERP is covered at the tier you are quoted.
PROGNOST Systems: Is it available on new Burckhardt machines?
Yes, Burckhardt Compression offers PROGNOST-NT as a factory-fitted condition monitoring option.
Related pages
More on Paperless Parts
More on PROGNOST Systems
Other head to heads
- Paperless Parts vs Fulcrum
- Paperless Parts vs AMFG
- Paperless Parts vs JobBOSS²
- Paperless Parts vs Xometry
- Paperless Parts vs Protolabs
- Paperless Parts vs Materialise Magics
- Paperless Parts vs 3YOURMIND
- Paperless Parts vs Prodsmart
- Paperless Parts vs SolidWorks
- Paperless Parts vs AVEVA System Platform
- Paperless Parts vs Aras Innovator
- Paperless Parts vs Erbessd Instruments
- Paperless Parts vs GENESIS Version 11
- Paperless Parts vs GrabCAD Print
- Paperless Parts vs Guidewheel
- Paperless Parts vs Kepware Server
- Paperless Parts vs Litmus Edge
- Paperless Parts vs Ignition
- Paperless Parts vs Augury
- Paperless Parts vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Paperless Parts vs KCF Technologies
- Paperless Parts vs Petasense
- Paperless Parts vs Sensemore
- Paperless Parts vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Paperless Parts vs eMaint
- Paperless Parts vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Paperless Parts vs Poseidon Systems
- Paperless Parts vs MOVUS
- Paperless Parts vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Paperless Parts vs Simplify3D
- Paperless Parts vs TrendMiner
- Paperless Parts vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- PROGNOST Systems vs Fulcrum
- PROGNOST Systems vs AMFG
- PROGNOST Systems vs JobBOSS²
- PROGNOST Systems vs Xometry
- PROGNOST Systems vs Protolabs
- PROGNOST Systems vs Materialise Magics
- PROGNOST Systems vs 3YOURMIND
- PROGNOST Systems vs Prodsmart
- PROGNOST Systems vs SolidWorks
- PROGNOST Systems vs AVEVA System Platform
- PROGNOST Systems vs Aras Innovator
- PROGNOST Systems vs Erbessd Instruments
- PROGNOST Systems vs GENESIS Version 11
- PROGNOST Systems vs GrabCAD Print
- PROGNOST Systems vs Guidewheel
- PROGNOST Systems vs Kepware Server
- PROGNOST Systems vs Litmus Edge
- PROGNOST Systems vs Ignition
- PROGNOST Systems vs Augury
- PROGNOST Systems vs SKF Enlight Centre
- PROGNOST Systems vs KCF Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs Petasense
- PROGNOST Systems vs Sensemore
- PROGNOST Systems vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs eMaint
- PROGNOST Systems vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- PROGNOST Systems vs Poseidon Systems
- PROGNOST Systems vs MOVUS
- PROGNOST Systems vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- PROGNOST Systems vs Simplify3D
- PROGNOST Systems vs TrendMiner
- PROGNOST Systems vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
