Manufacturing · head to head
OpenBOM vs QAD

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.; QAD no price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- They diverge on capability: OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, QAD covers Financial management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenBOM and QAD actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
Only in QAD
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Inventory management
- Quality management
- REST APIs
- EDI
- IoT integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot QAD
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot QAD
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot QAD
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot QAD
QAD
- ERP for manufacturers covering production execution and schedulingnot OpenBOM
- Supply chain planning, purchasing and inventory controlnot OpenBOM
- Quality management, traceability and supplier management for regulated manufacturingnot OpenBOM
- Field service and enterprise asset managementnot OpenBOM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
QAD
- No price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- Field service management, enterprise asset management and quality management are presented as separate functional areas rather than a single priced bundle
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
QAD
$2000/month- Standard$2000/month
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Premium$4000/month
- Advanced modules
- Analytics
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Choose QAD if
- You need financial management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- You also want manufacturing.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenBOM or QAD better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenBOM starts at Free and QAD at $2000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenBOM or QAD?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OpenBOM and $2000/month for QAD.
- Does OpenBOM or QAD run on more platforms?
- OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API. QAD runs on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. QAD starts at $2000/month.
- What is OpenBOM best used for?
- OpenBOM is most often used for a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run, a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them, an electronics team pulling boms straight out of altium and mechanical cad instead of retyping them, a small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a plm project. Of those, a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run and a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them are not what QAD is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenBOM do that QAD cannot?
- OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management. QAD covers Financial management, Manufacturing, Supply chain, Inventory management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
QAD: How can I get pricing information for QAD manufacturing software?
QAD does not publish standard pricing on their homepage. Pricing discussions occur during personalized consultations. Interested parties can request a demo, contact the sales team, or download brochures to discuss pricing based on specific organizational needs.
SourceOpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
QAD: What deployment options does QAD offer?
QAD provides adaptive ERP solutions for various industries including Automotive, Food & Beverage, and Life Sciences. Their offerings include connected workforce solutions and supply chain management, with implementation and advisory services available.
SourceOpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
QAD: Is there a trial available for QAD software without contacting sales?
The QAD homepage does not mention a free trial or self-serve trial option. The primary engagement path is through "Request a Demo" or "Contact Sales" buttons, suggesting trial access requires sales team interaction.
SourceOpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs BatchMaster
- OpenBOM vs DEAR Systems
- OpenBOM vs Fishbowl
- OpenBOM vs Infor CloudSuite
- OpenBOM vs MRPeasy
- OpenBOM vs Aptean
- OpenBOM vs Global Shop Solutions
- OpenBOM vs Metasfresh
- OpenBOM vs Katana MRP
- OpenBOM vs SYSPRO
- OpenBOM vs Rootstock
- OpenBOM vs IFS Cloud
- OpenBOM vs Unit4
- OpenBOM vs Visibility
- OpenBOM vs Yonyou
- OpenBOM vs Ivalua
- OpenBOM vs Zip
- OpenBOM vs GEP SMART
- QAD vs Fusion 360
- QAD vs Aras Innovator
- QAD vs Duro PLM
- QAD vs PTC Windchill
- QAD vs Propel
- QAD vs Materialise Magics
- QAD vs Ignition
- QAD vs Seeq
- QAD vs SolidWorks
- QAD vs AVEVA System Platform
- QAD vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- QAD vs AMFG
- QAD vs Authentise
- QAD vs COPA-DATA zenon
- QAD vs Autodesk Netfabb
- QAD vs Arena PLM
- QAD vs BatchMaster
- QAD vs DEAR Systems
- QAD vs Fishbowl
- QAD vs Infor CloudSuite
- QAD vs MRPeasy
- QAD vs Aptean
- QAD vs Global Shop Solutions
- QAD vs Metasfresh
- QAD vs Katana MRP
- QAD vs SYSPRO
- QAD vs Rootstock
- QAD vs IFS Cloud
- QAD vs Unit4
- QAD vs Visibility
- QAD vs Yonyou
- QAD vs Ivalua
- QAD vs Zip
- QAD vs GEP SMART

