Manufacturing · head to head
Propel vs QAD

Propel
Manufacturing
PLM, quality and product information management built on the Salesforce platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Propel your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.; QAD no price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- They diverge on capability: Propel covers Item and BOM management, QAD covers Financial management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Propel and QAD actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Propel
- Item and BOM management
- Change management
- Product information management
- Supplier collaboration
- Native Salesforce
- Licence types
Only in QAD
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Inventory management
- REST APIs
- EDI
- IoT integration
- Third-party systems
Both cover
- Quality management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Propel
- A medical device company needing linked design control and CAPA records for an ISO 13485 audit without an on-premise PLM programmenot QAD
- A consumer products firm publishing the same product record to engineering, packaging and e-commerce teamsnot QAD
- A company already standardised on Salesforce that wants product data governed with the same admin skills as the CRMnot QAD
- A hardware manufacturer routing customer complaints straight to the part revision and supplier that caused themnot QAD
QAD
- ERP for manufacturers covering production execution and schedulingnot Propel
- Supply chain planning, purchasing and inventory controlnot Propel
- Quality management, traceability and supplier management for regulated manufacturingnot Propel
- Field service and enterprise asset managementnot Propel
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Propel
- Your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- CAD data management is handled through connectors rather than natively; Propel manages metadata and files well but is not a substitute for a CAD vault on large assemblies.
- The published cost bands are extremely wide, from 10,000 to 500,000 US dollars a year, and setup can approach the annual licence, so early budgeting without a scoped quote is close to meaningless.
- Licence roles are split across Performance, Quality, Enrichment, Collaboration and Partner types, and buyers frequently discover mid-project that a user needs a more expensive role than budgeted.
- Salesforce platform limits such as governor limits, API call ceilings and storage allowances apply, and organisations with very large BOMs or heavy integration traffic hit them in ways a purpose-built PLM would not surface.
QAD
- No price, per user rate, minimum or contract term is published on the site; the only routes are a demo request and a Contact Sales link
- Field service management, enterprise asset management and quality management are presented as separate functional areas rather than a single priced bundle
Pricing, plan by plan
Propel
On request- Propel$undefined/year
- Annual user-based licensing in role types
- Salesforce platform access included in each licence
- Indicative small deployment band of 10,000 to 150,000 USD a year plus 10,000 to 25,000 setup
QAD
$2000/month- Standard$2000/month
- Financial management
- Manufacturing
- Supply chain
- Premium$4000/month
- Advanced modules
- Analytics
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Propel if
- You need item and bom management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- You also want change management.
Choose QAD if
- You need financial management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- You also want manufacturing.
Questions people ask
- Is Propel or QAD better?
- Neither clearly leads. Propel starts at On request and QAD at $2000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Propel or QAD?
- Propel starts at On request and QAD at $2000/month.
- Does Propel or QAD run on more platforms?
- Propel runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API. QAD runs on Cloud, On-premise, Web.
- What is Propel best used for?
- Propel is most often used for a medical device company needing linked design control and capa records for an iso 13485 audit without an on-premise plm programme, a consumer products firm publishing the same product record to engineering, packaging and e-commerce teams, a company already standardised on salesforce that wants product data governed with the same admin skills as the crm, a hardware manufacturer routing customer complaints straight to the part revision and supplier that caused them. Of those, a medical device company needing linked design control and capa records for an iso 13485 audit without an on-premise plm programme and a consumer products firm publishing the same product record to engineering, packaging and e-commerce teams are not what QAD is typically brought in for.
- What can Propel do that QAD cannot?
- Propel covers Item and BOM management, Change management, Product information management, Supplier collaboration. QAD covers Financial management, Manufacturing, Supply chain, Inventory management. Both handle Quality management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Propel: Do I need to buy Salesforce separately?
No. Each Propel licence includes Salesforce platform access, and end users do not need their own Salesforce licences or Salesforce expertise.
QAD: How can I get pricing information for QAD manufacturing software?
QAD does not publish standard pricing on their homepage. Pricing discussions occur during personalized consultations. Interested parties can request a demo, contact the sales team, or download brochures to discuss pricing based on specific organizational needs.
SourcePropel: Does being on Salesforce lock me in?
Practically, yes. The application, its configuration and your product data all sit in a Salesforce org, which is a real consideration at renewal.
QAD: What deployment options does QAD offer?
QAD provides adaptive ERP solutions for various industries including Automotive, Food & Beverage, and Life Sciences. Their offerings include connected workforce solutions and supply chain management, with implementation and advisory services available.
SourcePropel: What does it cost?
Propel publishes indicative bands rather than list prices: roughly 10,000 to 150,000 US dollars a year for a small deployment and 250,000 to 500,000 for a large one, plus setup.
QAD: Is there a trial available for QAD software without contacting sales?
The QAD homepage does not mention a free trial or self-serve trial option. The primary engagement path is through "Request a Demo" or "Contact Sales" buttons, suggesting trial access requires sales team interaction.
SourcePropel: Is it suitable for regulated medical devices?
Yes, that is a core segment; the quality module covers CAPA, non-conformance, audits and training records with electronic signatures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Propel vs Arena PLM
- Propel vs Aras Innovator
- Propel vs OpenBOM
- Propel vs Materialise Magics
- Propel vs SolidWorks
- Propel vs AVEVA System Platform
- Propel vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Propel vs Fusion 360
- Propel vs TrakSYS
- Propel vs Litmus Edge
- Propel vs Ignition
- Propel vs KCF Technologies
- Propel vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Propel vs LabVIEW
- Propel vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Propel vs ABB 800xA
- Propel vs PTC Windchill
- Propel vs BatchMaster
- Propel vs DEAR Systems
- Propel vs Fishbowl
- Propel vs Infor CloudSuite
- Propel vs MRPeasy
- Propel vs Aptean
- Propel vs Global Shop Solutions
- Propel vs Metasfresh
- Propel vs Katana MRP
- Propel vs SYSPRO
- Propel vs Rootstock
- Propel vs IFS Cloud
- Propel vs Unit4
- Propel vs Visibility
- Propel vs Yonyou
- Propel vs Ivalua
- Propel vs Zip
- Propel vs GEP SMART
- QAD vs Arena PLM
- QAD vs Aras Innovator
- QAD vs OpenBOM
- QAD vs Materialise Magics
- QAD vs SolidWorks
- QAD vs AVEVA System Platform
- QAD vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- QAD vs Fusion 360
- QAD vs TrakSYS
- QAD vs Litmus Edge
- QAD vs Ignition
- QAD vs KCF Technologies
- QAD vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- QAD vs LabVIEW
- QAD vs SKF Enlight Centre
- QAD vs ABB 800xA
- QAD vs PTC Windchill
- QAD vs BatchMaster
- QAD vs DEAR Systems
- QAD vs Fishbowl
- QAD vs Infor CloudSuite
- QAD vs MRPeasy
- QAD vs Aptean
- QAD vs Global Shop Solutions
- QAD vs Metasfresh
- QAD vs Katana MRP
- QAD vs SYSPRO
- QAD vs Rootstock
- QAD vs IFS Cloud
- QAD vs Unit4
- QAD vs Visibility
- QAD vs Yonyou
- QAD vs Ivalua
- QAD vs Zip
- QAD vs GEP SMART

