CAD · head to head
OnShape vs RealityScan

RealityScan
CAD
The photogrammetry engine formerly called RealityCapture, free below a one million dollar revenue line
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OnShape the free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private; RealityScan the free tier is bounded by company revenue rather than by usage, so a business crossing one million US dollars of turnover acquires a per-seat cost overnight for software its workflow now depends on
- They diverge on capability: OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD, RealityScan covers Photogrammetric reconstruction.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OnShape and RealityScan actually diverge.
| Attribute | OnShape | RealityScan |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Free below a revenue threshold, then per seat per year |
| Platforms | Web, IOS, Android | Windows |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OnShape
- Cloud-native CAD
- Real-time collaboration
- Version control
- Part studios
- Assemblies
- Drawings
- FeatureScript
- Mobile access
Only in RealityScan
- Photogrammetric reconstruction
- Laser scan fusion
- Ground control points
- Texturing and unwrapping
- Command line interface
- Unreal Engine path
- Component alignment control
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OnShape
- Cloud based parametric CAD without local workstation installsnot RealityScan
- Collaborative mechanical design with version history and shared documentsnot RealityScan
RealityScan
- A two-person heritage survey practice under the revenue threshold that can now run professional photogrammetry at no licence costnot OnShape
- A film or games asset team scanning props and environments at very high image counts where processing speed decides the schedulenot OnShape
- A survey firm combining terrestrial laser scans with drone photography and needing both aligned in a single reconstructionnot OnShape
- A construction reality-capture operator producing meshes for Unreal-based client visualisation from the same source imagerynot OnShape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OnShape
- The free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private
- The Standard plan is $1,500 per user per year and Professional $2,500
- Simulation, rendering, CAM and advanced PDM all require the Professional plan
- SSO, analytics and advanced administration are Enterprise only with no published price
RealityScan
- The free tier is bounded by company revenue rather than by usage, so a business crossing one million US dollars of turnover acquires a per-seat cost overnight for software its workflow now depends on
- New perpetual licences are no longer sold, so an organisation that deliberately avoided subscription software has no route in; existing perpetual holders keep their version but stop receiving updates unless they accept the current terms
- It is Windows only and needs an NVIDIA CUDA capable GPU, which excludes macOS studios and makes the real cost of adoption a workstation purchase rather than a licence
- The rename from RealityCapture to RealityScan in 2025 means tutorials, forum answers and third party pipeline documentation are split across two names and several licensing regimes, and much of it is now wrong about price
- The interface assumes photogrammetry knowledge; alignment failures, control point placement and reconstruction region setup are not guided, so a team without an experienced operator produces poor models quickly rather than good ones slowly
Pricing, plan by plan
OnShape
Free- FreeFree
- Limited features
- Public documents
- Standard$1500/month
- Private documents
- Full features
- Professional$2100/month
- Advanced simulation
- Enterprise features
RealityScan
Free- Free tierFree
- For individuals and companies with annual revenue under 1,000,000 USD
- Full application, no metered input charges
- Epic account required
- RealityScan seat$1250/year
- Required once annual revenue exceeds 1,000,000 USD
- Per seat, per year
- Commercial use without output restrictions
- Unreal Engine subscription$1850/year
- Per seat per year
- Includes RealityScan and Twinmotion
- For teams that also need Unreal Engine for non-game commercial use
Which should you pick?
Choose OnShape if
- You need cloud-native cad.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, IOS, Android.
- You also want real-time collaboration.
Choose RealityScan if
- You need photogrammetric reconstruction.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want laser scan fusion.
Questions people ask
- Is OnShape or RealityScan better?
- Neither clearly leads. OnShape starts at Free and RealityScan at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OnShape or RealityScan?
- OnShape starts at Free and RealityScan at Free.
- Does OnShape or RealityScan run on more platforms?
- OnShape runs on Web, IOS, Android. RealityScan runs on Windows.
- Can I use OnShape for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OnShape best used for?
- OnShape is most often used for cloud based parametric cad without local workstation installs, collaborative mechanical design with version history and shared documents. Of those, cloud based parametric cad without local workstation installs and collaborative mechanical design with version history and shared documents are not what RealityScan is typically brought in for.
- What can OnShape do that RealityScan cannot?
- OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD, Real-time collaboration, Version control, Part studios. RealityScan covers Photogrammetric reconstruction, Laser scan fusion, Ground control points, Texturing and unwrapping.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OnShape: How much does Onshape cost?
Onshape Standard is $1,500 per user per year and Professional is $2,500 per user per year, both billed annually. Enterprise is quoted by sales. A free plan exists for non-commercial use.
SourceRealityScan: Is RealityCapture still called that?
No. Epic rebranded it to RealityScan with version 2.0 in 2025. It is the same engine and the same team.
OnShape: Is the free version of Onshape usable for commercial work?
No. Onshape states the free plan is for non-commercial use only, and every document created on it is publicly accessible. Private storage requires the Standard plan at $1,500 per user per year.
SourceRealityScan: Who gets it free?
Individuals and companies with annual revenue under one million US dollars. Above that, a seat is 1,250 US dollars per year.
OnShape: What does Onshape Professional add over Standard?
Professional adds company managed data, release management, advanced PDM, simulation, rendering, ECAD to MCAD exchange and CAM, for $2,500 per user per year against $1,500 for Standard.
SourceRealityScan: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Not for new purchases. Existing perpetual licences remain valid for the version owned, with updates only under the current terms.
OnShape: Can I try Onshape Professional for free?
Onshape states that qualified professionals can try Onshape Professional free for up to 6 months through its Discovery Program, with no credit card required.
SourceRealityScan: Does the free version restrict output?
No output metering or watermarking; the restriction is on who qualifies, based on company revenue, not on what you export.
Related pages
More on RealityScan
Other head to heads
- OnShape vs Altium 365
- OnShape vs Enscape
- OnShape vs KeyShot
- OnShape vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- OnShape vs FreeCAD
- OnShape vs Zoo
- OnShape vs V-Ray
- OnShape vs SolveSpace
- OnShape vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- OnShape vs Lumion
- OnShape vs Twinmotion
- OnShape vs ANSYS Fluent
- OnShape vs Substance 3D Designer
- OnShape vs Tinkercad
- OnShape vs Vectorworks
- OnShape vs Houdini
- OnShape vs ZBrush
- OnShape vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- OnShape vs CloudCompare
- OnShape vs Carlson Software
- OnShape vs Nomad Sculpt
- OnShape vs KiCad
- OnShape vs MicroSurvey CAD
- OnShape vs Bentley MicroStation
- OnShape vs D5 Render
- OnShape vs LightWave 3D
- OnShape vs Arnold
- OnShape vs Inventor
- OnShape vs Mudbox
- RealityScan vs Altium 365
- RealityScan vs Enscape
- RealityScan vs KeyShot
- RealityScan vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- RealityScan vs FreeCAD
- RealityScan vs Zoo
- RealityScan vs V-Ray
- RealityScan vs SolveSpace
- RealityScan vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- RealityScan vs Lumion
- RealityScan vs Twinmotion
- RealityScan vs ANSYS Fluent
- RealityScan vs Substance 3D Designer
- RealityScan vs Tinkercad
- RealityScan vs Vectorworks
- RealityScan vs Houdini
- RealityScan vs ZBrush
- RealityScan vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- RealityScan vs CloudCompare
- RealityScan vs Carlson Software
- RealityScan vs Nomad Sculpt
- RealityScan vs KiCad
- RealityScan vs MicroSurvey CAD
- RealityScan vs Bentley MicroStation
- RealityScan vs D5 Render
- RealityScan vs LightWave 3D
- RealityScan vs Arnold
- RealityScan vs Inventor
- RealityScan vs Mudbox

