Software · head to head
Inventor vs OnShape
The short version
- Only OnShape has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Inventor autodesk publishes no licence price through UK G-Cloud: every listing found there is reseller delivered training at 750 to 1,500 pounds per day rather than software licensing, and neither AWS Marketplace nor GSA carries the product; OnShape the free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private
- They diverge on capability: Inventor covers Parametric modeling, OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Inventor and OnShape actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Inventor
- Parametric modeling
- Assembly design
- Sheet metal
- Simulation
- Rendering
- Technical documentation
- Frame generator
- AutoCAD
Only in OnShape
- Cloud-native CAD
- Real-time collaboration
- Version control
- Part studios
- Assemblies
- Drawings
- FeatureScript
- Mobile access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Inventor
- Mechanical designnot OnShape
- Product developmentnot OnShape
- Manufacturing documentationnot OnShape
OnShape
- Cloud based parametric CAD without local workstation installsnot Inventor
- Collaborative mechanical design with version history and shared documentsnot Inventor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Inventor
- Autodesk publishes no licence price through UK G-Cloud: every listing found there is reseller delivered training at 750 to 1,500 pounds per day rather than software licensing, and neither AWS Marketplace nor GSA carries the product
OnShape
- The free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private
- The Standard plan is $1,500 per user per year and Professional $2,500
- Simulation, rendering, CAM and advanced PDM all require the Professional plan
- SSO, analytics and advanced administration are Enterprise only with no published price
Pricing, plan by plan
Inventor
$29/month- Inventor$2085/month
- Full mechanical design
- Simulation
- Documentation
- Product Design & Manufacturing Collection$2475/month
- Inventor + AutoCAD + more
OnShape
Free- FreeFree
- Limited features
- Public documents
- Standard$1500/month
- Private documents
- Full features
- Professional$2100/month
- Advanced simulation
- Enterprise features
Which should you pick?
Choose Inventor if
- You need parametric modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want assembly design.
Choose OnShape if
- You need cloud-native cad.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, IOS, Android.
- You also want real-time collaboration.
Questions people ask
- Is Inventor or OnShape better?
- Neither clearly leads. Inventor starts at $29/month and OnShape at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Inventor or OnShape?
- OnShape has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for Inventor and Free for OnShape.
- Does Inventor or OnShape run on more platforms?
- Inventor runs on Windows. OnShape runs on Web, IOS, Android.
- Can I use OnShape for free?
- Yes. OnShape has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Inventor starts at $29/month.
- What is Inventor best used for?
- Inventor is most often used for mechanical design, product development, manufacturing documentation. Of those, mechanical design and product development are not what OnShape is typically brought in for.
- What can Inventor do that OnShape cannot?
- Inventor covers Parametric modeling, Assembly design, Sheet metal, Simulation. OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD, Real-time collaboration, Version control, Part studios.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Inventor vs Enscape
- Inventor vs V-Ray
- Inventor vs FreeCAD
- Inventor vs KeyShot
- Inventor vs Lumion
- Inventor vs Houdini
- Inventor vs Arnold
- Inventor vs Mudbox
- Inventor vs Corona Renderer
- Inventor vs D5 Render
- Inventor vs Twinmotion
- Inventor vs LightWave 3D
- Inventor vs OpenSCAD
- Inventor vs PrusaSlicer
- Inventor vs Siemens NX
- Inventor vs ZBrush
- Inventor vs 3D-Coat
- Inventor vs Alibre Design
- OnShape vs Enscape
- OnShape vs V-Ray
- OnShape vs FreeCAD
- OnShape vs KeyShot
- OnShape vs Lumion
- OnShape vs Houdini
- OnShape vs Arnold
- OnShape vs Mudbox
- OnShape vs Corona Renderer
- OnShape vs D5 Render
- OnShape vs Twinmotion
- OnShape vs LightWave 3D
- OnShape vs OpenSCAD
- OnShape vs PrusaSlicer
- OnShape vs Siemens NX
- OnShape vs ZBrush
- OnShape vs 3D-Coat
- OnShape vs Alibre Design


