CAD · head to head
CloudCompare vs OnShape

CloudCompare
CAD
Open source point cloud comparison and processing maintained largely by one person in their spare time
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CloudCompare the project is administered by its creator in his spare time while he holds a full-time job elsewhere, so an organisation building a monitoring programme on it depends on one person with no obligation to continue; OnShape the free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private
- They diverge on capability: CloudCompare covers Cloud to cloud distance, OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudCompare and OnShape actually diverge.
| Attribute | CloudCompare | OnShape |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, IOS, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudCompare
- Cloud to cloud distance
- Cloud to mesh distance
- Registration
- Segmentation and cleaning
- Plugin architecture
- Format support
- Command line mode
Only in OnShape
- Cloud-native CAD
- Real-time collaboration
- Version control
- Part studios
- Assemblies
- Drawings
- FeatureScript
- Mobile access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudCompare
- A monitoring engineer comparing quarterly laser scans of a retaining wall to quantify movement without buying a proprietary deformation packagenot OnShape
- A heritage team registering dozens of terrestrial scans of a building into a single cloud before meshingnot OnShape
- A geomorphologist measuring erosion between two drone-derived surfaces of a river banknot OnShape
- A survey technician cleaning and subsampling a scan before delivering it to a client whose software cannot handle the full densitynot OnShape
OnShape
- Cloud based parametric CAD without local workstation installsnot CloudCompare
- Collaborative mechanical design with version history and shared documentsnot CloudCompare
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudCompare
- The project is administered by its creator in his spare time while he holds a full-time job elsewhere, so an organisation building a monitoring programme on it depends on one person with no obligation to continue
- There is no commercial support contract from anyone, so a defect that blocks a deliverable is resolved by a GitHub issue and community goodwill rather than by an agreement
- Processing is single machine and memory bound, so very large aerial lidar collections must be tiled manually and large jobs are limited by the workstation rather than scaled out
- The interface is unforgiving and organised around the underlying data structures rather than around tasks, so competent surveyors routinely take weeks to become productive
- Plugins vary widely in maintenance, and several useful ones originated in research projects that have since ended, so a workflow built around a specific plugin can break at the next release
OnShape
- The free plan is non commercial only and makes every document publicly accessible, so nothing designed on it can be kept private
- The Standard plan is $1,500 per user per year and Professional $2,500
- Simulation, rendering, CAM and advanced PDM all require the Professional plan
- SSO, analytics and advanced administration are Enterprise only with no published price
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudCompare
Free- CloudCompareFree
- GNU General Public Licence
- No licence fee and no usage limits
- No commercial support contract exists
OnShape
Free- FreeFree
- Limited features
- Public documents
- Standard$1500/month
- Private documents
- Full features
- Professional$2100/month
- Advanced simulation
- Enterprise features
Which should you pick?
Choose CloudCompare if
- You need cloud to cloud distance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want cloud to mesh distance.
Choose OnShape if
- You need cloud-native cad.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, IOS, Android.
- You also want real-time collaboration.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudCompare or OnShape better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudCompare starts at Free and OnShape at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudCompare or OnShape?
- CloudCompare starts at Free and OnShape at Free.
- Does CloudCompare or OnShape run on more platforms?
- CloudCompare runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. OnShape runs on Web, IOS, Android.
- Can I use CloudCompare for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CloudCompare best used for?
- CloudCompare is most often used for a monitoring engineer comparing quarterly laser scans of a retaining wall to quantify movement without buying a proprietary deformation package, a heritage team registering dozens of terrestrial scans of a building into a single cloud before meshing, a geomorphologist measuring erosion between two drone-derived surfaces of a river bank, a survey technician cleaning and subsampling a scan before delivering it to a client whose software cannot handle the full density. Of those, a monitoring engineer comparing quarterly laser scans of a retaining wall to quantify movement without buying a proprietary deformation package and a heritage team registering dozens of terrestrial scans of a building into a single cloud before meshing are not what OnShape is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudCompare do that OnShape cannot?
- CloudCompare covers Cloud to cloud distance, Cloud to mesh distance, Registration, Segmentation and cleaning. OnShape covers Cloud-native CAD, Real-time collaboration, Version control, Part studios.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CloudCompare: Who maintains CloudCompare?
Daniel Girardeau-Montaut, its creator, administers it in his own time alongside a full-time engineering job, with contributions from a community of users and research groups.
OnShape: How much does Onshape cost?
Onshape Standard is $1,500 per user per year and Professional is $2,500 per user per year, both billed annually. Enterprise is quoted by sales. A free plan exists for non-commercial use.
SourceCloudCompare: Can I buy support?
No. There is no vendor and no commercial support offering. Some geospatial consultancies know it well and can be hired, but they are not contracted to support the software itself.
OnShape: Is the free version of Onshape usable for commercial work?
No. Onshape states the free plan is for non-commercial use only, and every document created on it is publicly accessible. Private storage requires the Standard plan at $1,500 per user per year.
SourceCloudCompare: Is it suitable for commercial deliverables?
It is widely used for them. The licence permits it and the algorithms are well regarded. The risk is operational, not legal: no support and no roadmap commitment.
OnShape: What does Onshape Professional add over Standard?
Professional adds company managed data, release management, advanced PDM, simulation, rendering, ECAD to MCAD exchange and CAM, for $2,500 per user per year against $1,500 for Standard.
SourceCloudCompare: Can it handle a full aerial lidar survey?
Not in one piece. It is memory bound on a single machine, so large collections need tiling or a dedicated lidar pipeline such as PDAL.
OnShape: Can I try Onshape Professional for free?
Onshape states that qualified professionals can try Onshape Professional free for up to 6 months through its Discovery Program, with no credit card required.
SourceRelated pages
More on CloudCompare
Other head to heads
- CloudCompare vs KiCad
- CloudCompare vs SolveSpace
- CloudCompare vs FreeCAD
- CloudCompare vs RealityScan
- CloudCompare vs OpenSCAD
- CloudCompare vs Bambu Studio
- CloudCompare vs V-Ray
- CloudCompare vs KeyShot
- CloudCompare vs PrusaSlicer
- CloudCompare vs Ultimaker Cura
- CloudCompare vs Rhino 3D
- CloudCompare vs Solid Edge
- CloudCompare vs Substance 3D Designer
- CloudCompare vs Tinkercad
- CloudCompare vs Vectorworks
- CloudCompare vs Altium 365
- CloudCompare vs Enscape
- CloudCompare vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- CloudCompare vs Zoo
- CloudCompare vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- CloudCompare vs Lumion
- CloudCompare vs Twinmotion
- CloudCompare vs ANSYS Fluent
- CloudCompare vs Houdini
- CloudCompare vs ZBrush
- OnShape vs KiCad
- OnShape vs SolveSpace
- OnShape vs FreeCAD
- OnShape vs RealityScan
- OnShape vs OpenSCAD
- OnShape vs Bambu Studio
- OnShape vs V-Ray
- OnShape vs KeyShot
- OnShape vs PrusaSlicer
- OnShape vs Ultimaker Cura
- OnShape vs Rhino 3D
- OnShape vs Solid Edge
- OnShape vs Substance 3D Designer
- OnShape vs Tinkercad
- OnShape vs Vectorworks
- OnShape vs Altium 365
- OnShape vs Enscape
- OnShape vs COMSOL Multiphysics
- OnShape vs Zoo
- OnShape vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- OnShape vs Lumion
- OnShape vs Twinmotion
- OnShape vs ANSYS Fluent
- OnShape vs Houdini
- OnShape vs ZBrush

